Finally caught up this morning. There were a few posts that stood out to me as I was catching up, but the multi-quote feature has failed me.
First of all, when CCS was being asked about why Absolutbro was defending him, CCS said that maybe it was because he was trustworty. I think that is a very odd statement, since we are playing a game of lies and doubt. Trust between townies is an important part of town winning, but it needs to be earned and built up. For example, while I currently think cabot is making good points, I certainly don't trust him. I just figure that if cabot is mafia he is probably bussing his teammates if they make any major errors. So attributing anyone's actions to trust at this stage of the game rings hollow.
The other post that caught my eye was Timeaisis's post where he claimed that he was the only one who thought Flame_AC was suspicious. But I had listed Flame_AC as possible scum yesterday, and Kyanrute had just finished making a few long arguments as to why Flame might be scum. It makes me feel that Timeaisis isn't giving this thread his full attention. Maybe he is following the mafia chat too much?
Anyways SkyOdin is my top scum suspect. After I placed a joke vote on Ri'Orius, he asked me to clarify my intentions. My vote was something most town would brush off as nonsense, but something a scum player would be concerned about if the vote was on a teammate.
vote: SkyOdin
Why would I brush off a vote as nonsense? People leave votes without justification all the time for a variety of reasons. While there was reason to think it was just a joke, I like to press people to make sure. There are times where, by either malicious intent or simple inertia, a simple joke vote is left until the end of the game where it becomes a real vote.
