TSMC will probably be able to put them to better use too / at a lower risk as they have very high volume from the most demanding customers…Intel only bought the first ones. So they got a head start over TSMC.
But TSMC is going to receive their High NA machines before the end of this year.
@Leonidas on suicide watch for real!!!
They are going to get $8.5 billion of our taxpayer dollars soon.Damn! And there is no way to blame this one on Wokeness
Here https://www.extremetech.com/computing/report-intel-bought-all-of-asmls-high-na-euv-machines-for-2024Apparently it is not the case… .
Intel is getting its first high-NA machine up and running at its Oregon facility, but it's not expected to be fully operational until 2025. Once it's firing on all cylinders, Intel has stated it will be used to produce the company's 14A process, which isn't due until 2026 or thereabouts.
The quoted article states that in 2025, ASML will likely sell high-NA equipment to both Samsung and SK Hynix, but not until the end of the year. This theoretically will give Intel about a year's head start on both companies.
One has to wonder when TSMC will hop aboard this bandwagon. So far, the company has stated it doesn't see the benefit of high-NA to its customers, so it's sticking with EUV for the foreseeable future.
Policymakers in Washington have grown worried enough about chipmaker Intel to begin quietly discussing scenarios should it need further assistance, beyond the billions in government funds the company is already slated to receive, people familiar with the matter said.
A strong quarterly earnings outlook yesterday bought the company breathing room with investors, but abstract concerns in Washington have turned into potential backup options, should Intel’s finances continue to deteriorate.
Top officials at the Commerce Department, which oversees implementation of the CHIPS Act funding to reinvigorate American chip production, and members of Congress including Sen. Mark Warner, one of the law’s leading champions, have discussed whether the company needs more help, the people said.
Intel’s wobbles may force Washington to choose between two of its ideological priorities: promoting national champions and preventing corporate consolidation. On a clear day, there’s little chance antitrust regulators would allow Intel to merge with any of its rivals. Expediency often forces policy compromises — see JPMorgan’s emergency rescue of First Republic last year — but if Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo can outmuscle Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, it will show just how deep Intel’s problems run.
The government will end up bailing them out.
I think company's are slow to it given the machine sizes. With 3nm being a high volume norm right now, reaching 2nm it's pretty much it. Stacking of high-na will have to be the go too
Maybe they should have cut out the avocado toastHow do you even have $30B of expenses in a single quarter?
Damn! And there is no way to blame this one on Wokeness
Not gonna happen: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asml-holding-usa-china-insight-idUSKBN1Z50HNToo lazy to read financials, but going by those blue boxes, it's like getting blue balls. Ouch. Especially the margin part.
Maybe Intel should jump on the manufacturing train like almost every company does from chips to blenders. Make it overseas for cheap. Heck, Intel has to ship their CPUs to Asia anyway for companies to put into computers, so might as well just let those giant Chinese companies make it over there too.
But from what I remember, Intel is in talks with US gov to make more foundries in the US (if they get gov deals), so it doesn't look like they want to give up manufacturing control..
The dark decade of measly 3% silicon gains a year. Everything feels so breakneck fast now with competition all going gung ho at each other. Makes me wonder where we would have been if that previous decade was also so heavily competitive, without AMD's Bullshitdozer misadventure.Ah for the glory days of "contra-revenue" when they had 90% market share.... huge amount of duplicate roles and needless complexity, no problem back when you were guaranteed sales and mega profits...
Intel Plans 35 Percent Cut In Costs For Sales And Marketing Group
Intel’s Sales and Marketing Group plans to cut jobs and ‘simplify programs’ as part of a directive to slash costs by 35 percent by the end of the year, CRN has learned.www.crn.com
Most companies say this nowIntel Diversity and Inclusion Policy
Examines key diversity and inclusion policy issues including pay parity, underrepresented minorities, supplier diversity, and opposing discrimination.www.intel.comIntel Global Diversity and Inclusion
At Intel, we are committed to advancing diversity and inclusion at every level in our company and the broader industry. It is foundational to our business and purpose – to create world-changing technowww.intel.com