Unless a reviewer gets their hands on the chips that shipped early, Nov 4th is the day NDA lifts AFAICT.When can we expect real benchmarks? Tomorrow?
I have an old Intel P35 motherboard that can use both DDR2 and DDR3. IIRC some of AMD’s AM2/AM3 CPUs had integrated memory controllers that could support multiple memory types as well. Not uncommon at all when a new memory standard comes out.Oh shit, lol I missed that.
So you know Steve at Gamers Nexus knows this and will test, same with Hardware unboxed.
Anyone notice INTEL BOARDS are showing DDR4 and DDR5 respectively? So you can use either or? Thats a first.
Seems like the reviews wont even be using the best DDR5 kits available. So more room for improvement.
The gaming benchmarks slide has some interesting info. 12900K on par with 5950x in some games, better than some. However, this was done on Windows 11 (prior to the AMD fixes for L3) and using DDR5.
Third Pary Benchmarks on November 4
Seems like the reviews wont even be using the best DDR5 kits available. So more room for improvement.
The gaming benchmarks slide has some interesting info. 12900K on par with 5950x in some games, better than some. However, this was done on Windows 11 (prior to the AMD fixes for L3) and using DDR5.
Third Pary Benchmarks on November 4
Fucking lol, the performance gains vs Ryzen 5000 have been tested in Windows 11 pre-patch in intels press release.
Seems like the reviews wont even be using the best DDR5 kits available. So more room for improvement.
The gaming benchmarks slide has some interesting info. 12900K on par with 5950x in some games, better than some. However, this was done on Windows 11 (prior to the AMD fixes for L3) and using DDR5.
Third Pary Benchmarks on November 4
Probably won't learn about Zen 3D Cache chips until CES along with Zen4 I'd say. So January at the earliest I'd say. If we got another droplet of information this year I'd be very, very surprised. I can't wait till the 4th though, I hope Alder Lake is really good to push this competition even more. Loving the shit talk from Gelsinger telling Dr. Su that the run is over for AMD. That's the type smoke I'm trying to see.Can AMD already showcase there CPU's. Go AMD do it.
Internally on the Intel 7 process.It was probably already mentioned in this thread, but curious to know if these are internally fabbed or outsourced?
AMD to introduce Instinct MI250 HPC GPUs and Milan-X CPUs on November 8th, 2021. Milan-X CPUs have the extra stacked cache.Probably won't learn about Zen 3D Cache chips until CES along with Zen4 I'd say. So January at the earliest I'd say. If we got another droplet of information this year I'd be very, very surprised. I can't wait till the 4th though, I hope Alder Lake is really good to push this competition even more. Loving the shit talk from Gelsinger telling Dr. Su that the run is over for AMD. That's the type smoke I'm trying to see.
I'm waiting on the mainstream CPUs, the Zen3+ chips. The 5900x's tierAMD to introduce Instinct MI250 HPC GPUs and Milan-X CPUs on November 8th, 2021. Milan-X CPUs have the extra stacked cache.
Somewhat similar to you.I have a 38" ultrawide monitor (3840x1600), currently using a rtx 3090, I'm assuming I should be golden if I grab a 12900k?
I feel like my current i79700k holds me back ever so slightly in some regards.
I'm happy with my 5950x for the time being, I feel no urge to go back to Intel with all their BS they're pulling these days.isn't the 11900k performing worse then 10900k? in age of empire 4 the 10900k was beating the 5950x already.
Anyway if you want to see valid benchmarks of how the chip performs, even those tech youtubers are not going to feed you good results. they will be all send golden samples.
Welp, so much for that excitement.
I think we can make an intelligent guess that the new 5800X isnt going to be cheaper than the old 5800X.
Even when they refreshed the XTs they dropped the prices of the old chips and launch the XTs at "msrp".
AMD doesnt have a sub 300 dollar chip and "if" the benchs are even remotely accurate the 12600KF is gonna be a killer deal.
I think the idea is that the small cores will take care of small background tasks (Windows...) so that the big cores can go all-in and push games and nothing else. At least in theory it sounds good imo.like why not just release the 12700k with 8 big cores and no small cores. the same goes for 12600k why not 8 big cores and no small cores. They really try to sell that small / big core design on people.
I think the idea is that the small cores will take care of small background tasks (Windows...) so that the big cores can go all-in and push games and nothing else. At least in theory it sounds good imo.
Great idea until it sacrifices main game performance with the 12600 by delivering less big cores. The 12600 design makes no sense because of that.
on top of it they could have released a cheaper 12700k with no small cores for people that simple want game performance and nothing else. Just weird choices all around.
However i do think small/big core design is going to be the future, we need faster gaming cores. for os stuff like watching stream/movies on the a second screen, having some smaller cores would be great. no need ot have full blown cpu cores for those.
Now I’m wondering if we’ll have to overclock the p cores and e cores separately, meaning that overclocking will take twice a larger long…
I think you maybe underestimating just how fast these 'e' cores are.
I'm sure some people have thoughts of Xbox Jaguar CPU levels of performance when in actuality, they're not far off Skylake performance.
Yes, but Intel wants to make money. If you want 8 big cores, you need to shell out 400 bucks.I know they are fast, but the problem is they are slower. Which doesn't make sense for gaming. 8 cores will be used and are already used in a ton of games. limiting big cores for small ones isn't a good solution in my view but intel will find it necessary because those youtube benchers and most outlets do absolute dog shit effort in benching those chips an will draw conclusions that 8 big cores are probably worse then 6+4 because they only test single core performance and all core performance.
In my view for gaming this would have been better.
12500k 6 big cores
12600k 8 big cores
12700k 8 big cores, 4 small cores
12900k 8 big cores, 8 small cores.
Yes, but Intel wants to make money. If you want 8 big cores, you need to shell out 400 bucks.
Now I’m wondering if we’ll have to overclock the p cores and e cores separately, meaning that overclocking will take twice a larger long…
Since they're still monolithic my best guess without more info is that they're aiming to push out one or maybe two distinct pieces of silicon and bin those for defects, clocks & efficiency across laptop & desktop space into different SKUs. A bit like Nvidia with GA104 spread across the 3060 Ti, 3070 & 3070Ti but much more of a difference and more flexible.like why not just release the 12700k with 8 big cores and no small cores. the same goes for 12600k why not 8 big cores and no small cores. They really try to sell that small / big core design on people.
Since they're still monolithic my best guess without more info is that they're aiming to push out one or maybe two distinct pieces of silicon and bin those for defects, clocks & efficiency across laptop & desktop space into different SKUs. A bit like Nvidia with GA104 spread across the 3060 Ti, 3070 & 3070Ti but much more of a difference and more flexible.
Just read a article that someone mentioned earlier that not only was it on W11 prior to the patch, on top ryzen P1 was set to 105W while Intels was set to 245W...imagine, Intel draws 2.3x as much power on a unpatched build and still only wins by 10%... That's a big oof right there. And that against a 1 year old CPU... They will get leapfrogged with the next ZEN CPU again.Welp, so much for that excitement.
Just read a article that someone mentioned earlier that not only was it on W11 prior to the patch, on top ryzen P1 was set to 105W while Intels was set to 245W...imagine, Intel draws 2.3x as much power on a unpatched build and still only wins by 10%... That's a big oof right there. And that against a 1 year old CPU... They will get leapfrogged with the next ZEN CPU again.
I wanna see 12 series DDR4 vs 5 memory benchmarks. Everyone is only rambling about high latency. What about 5 being quad channel on mainstream boards? [2 per module]Pain of early adoption.
Can't source DDR5 anywhere in the UK - All out of stock
My Kraken X62 needs a stand-off plate which won't be released until mid-late November
Pain of early adoption.
Can't source DDR5 anywhere in the UK - All out of stock
My Kraken X62 needs a stand-off plate which won't be released until mid-late November
I should have time for the benches to come out, due to having to wait for the adapter plate for my kraken.I wanna see 12 series DDR4 vs 5 memory benchmarks. Everyone is only rambling about high latency. What about 5 being quad channel on mainstream boards? [2 per module]
Crucial had 64 gigs for 350 yest., now only 16 GB [2x8] kit left. https://uk.crucial.com/catalog/memory/ddr5