The reality is, we don't know if this was wholly an Apple decision to cut off Google or not. I imagine the volume from iOS users was astronomical. It was a win-win for both companies and consumers, although the application has admittedly not improved much since 2007.I believe this. But if google makes a 3rd party app in the store, the apple funding will not continue. So what's the point in doing it?
Increased advertising revenue.
I rarely saw a sponsored result in the old iOS map app, but the old YouTube app didn't have them either. I could see a more ad prevalent google maps app I suppose. I'd think they'd still make the users sweat a bit. They could have made a New maps app awhile ago, but clearly chose not to
how do I get flyover?
I dont see it on maps
how do I get flyover?
I dont see it on maps
My understanding is that was Apple's doing. Part of the licensing agreement, in other words.
4. Part of this smacks of Apple's bad old US-centric ways. You can bet Cupertino (pop. ~58k) and a lot of midsize US cities have a lot fewer mistakes than London apparently has. I live in London and was demoing the app to someone so I put in walking directions to my nearest Tube station. I was stunned to find that the station and the one directly east of it are not on the map. This is completely inexcusable.
Not really, I've never seen an ad on maps for android.
Maps money isn't in eyeball ads. It's in listing information.
4. Part of this smacks of Apple's bad old US-centric ways. You can bet Cupertino (pop. ~58k) and a lot of midsize US cities have a lot fewer mistakes than London apparently has. I live in London and was demoing the app to someone so I put in walking directions to my nearest Tube station. I was stunned to find that the station and the one directly east of it are not on the map. This is completely inexcusable.
Auto predict is even worse in iOS six. No, iPhone "draw that well" is not "draw that we'll"
Completely infuriating.
I did that for a while.. It's.. Interesting..I'd switch off Autocorrect if I wasn't so lazy.
No I just mean my phone doesn't make any sound period ever at any time except for alarms.I hate the clicking sound, so I also have it switched off. Didn't know it was "oldskool".
iPhone 5 lines shorter than expected as early adopters try to use iOS 6 Maps to locate Apple Stores.
"Where we're going, we don't need roads!" - iOS 6 Maps
Sorry if posted but there are some real good tweets regarding the new apple maps:
And then there's this lol:
no, #ios6maps, I dont have to take a ferry to walk that. see that bridge there? you may have heard of it.
Tumblr devoted to similar images of map results apple is giving: http://goo.gl/udIrc
Maybe they thought Magneto destroyed that bridge or something.Sorry if posted but there are some real good tweets regarding the new apple maps:
And then there's this lol:
no, #ios6maps, I dont have to take a ferry to walk that. see that bridge there? you may have heard of it.
Tumblr devoted to similar images of map results apple is giving: http://goo.gl/udIrc
"Where we're going, we don't need roads!" - iOS 6 Maps
Holy shit :lolTumblr devoted to similar images of map results apple is giving: http://goo.gl/udIrc
Google Maps suggests the same thing actually. The ferry is a lot faster.Sorry if posted but there are some real good tweets regarding the new apple maps:
And then there's this lol:
no, #ios6maps, I dont have to take a ferry to walk that. see that bridge there? you may have heard of it.
Tumblr devoted to similar images of map results apple is giving: http://goo.gl/udIrc
Those are driving directions.I just did that same route, and it's directing me to take the Golden Gate Bridge.
It said it would take about 28 minutes.
Google Maps suggests the same thing actually. The ferry is a lot faster.
Click walking directionsSuggested route still says to take the bridge....
Suggested route still says to take the bridge....
Click walking directions
Those are driving directions.
Apple branching into maps was always going to be huge fail.
There's something Google Maps will always have that no other maps will ever have....Google.
@anildash Apple had no choice. They need to stop making Google’s maps better, which is what they’ve been doing moment-in and moment-out for years.
What’s missing from this conversation is that map usage is critical. Regardless of Google’s PR success in the Atlantic’s unintentionally misleading Google Ground Truth infomercial, more than half of Google’s mobile map usage is going away in the next month or two. I love the Atlantic, but they got punkd. Usage makes maps better a lot faster than software does.
Google’s maps are going to start degrading. Apple’s will get better. They’ll meet in the middle within 18 months.
And, you know, Google has had a team building on this for the past 10 years, while Apple maps was released just...yesterday. Yes, there's some holes, but some aspects are genuinely better. This was a massive, masisve undertaking and I have no doubt it will get much better in the coming months as usage increases and they fix/add stuff- like any maps database. For those of you wondering why Apple decided to do their own thing in house, they really had no choice:
1- Maps is one of the most important and used iPhone apps. It makes no sense to leave its fate in the hands of its biggest competitor
2- Google has little incentive to make their iOS maps app the best it can be, and add all the Android features to it. There's reports that they refused to give Apple turn by turn.
This was inevitable, and in the long run it will be a good thing. The biggest change si that Google is instantly losing usage stats and maps data from hundreds of millions of customers, while APple will instantly gain them. This is huge. ie. Apple maps will get better very quickly, while the rate of Google maps getting better will decrease. We'll see where things stand 6 months, but I'm thinking the gap will lessen significantly.Also, I'm sure Google will have their own maps app in the store soon, so win-win in that case.
So you think they put ads?Increased advertising revenue.
iTunes Match is perfect.
Give me clean versions of my songs and I'll never complaign again.
Didn't it already switch out explicit versions with clean versions before? I recall that being an annoying issue that the service didn't get right, since people may want to keep their explicit versions.
Lots of this is true, Google has had about a decade head start on Apple and Apples maps will eventually get better but they shouldn't have released it in its current state.
And this is coming from someone that lives in NYC which actually has pretty good support in the new maps.
I looked up San Francisco to Sausalito last week in Google Maps and it gave me the exact same result.
They need usage data to get better. Google Maps has been iterated not just by the developers but by the huge amounts of usage data they have collected over the years.
Because of AT&T I can't use FaceTime over 3G.
FU AT&T!