Garrett Hawke
Member
96 Bernie, 92 Hillary, and then another Democrat at 78 and then Bush at 41 (lol)
Apparently I am like 56% of NeoGAF.com
Apparently I am like 56% of NeoGAF.com
I was fearful to post my results due to the possible threat of being banned for not being left-wing, but whatever, figured I'd post anyways.
I'd figure why they don't post as much is because a lot of members on GAF are really militant and "fuck you, I'm right" about their views. People don't like being ganged up and shamed when they're attempting to have a discussion.
I got 93% with Bernie which sounds about right.
My only issue with him is that he's non religious in any way and parts of me worry how that will affect his stance on religious issues such as tax breaks for churches and housing allowance for pastors. This affects me personally being a pastor and all.
Details pleaseI had two "republican" family member take this test. Both aligned with Bernie Sanders and Clinton above all else. Lol the reactions were amazing.
Hmm not sure how the website determines your results then. For health care I said I support a single payer system, like Canada. I said there should be more gun control. Not sure how I get 90% with that guy.
Maybe my position on illegal immigration. It seems like being against illegal immigration in America makes you right wing or something.
Eh, being against economic refugees (which the right wing labeled as "illegal") is a core conservative stand point. It's not an American exclusive thing except the label "illegal immigration".
92 Bernie. I don't have very strong views on some subjects so having to go 'yes' or 'no' on some questions was rough. I'm actually surprised it was only 92. I need to research some of the issues better and retake this before the primaries.
i got 92% with bernie sanders and have no idea who he is (australian). does he realistically have any chance whatsoever?
Giving are completely corrupt, notoriously ineffective government more power? Sure, sounds like a brilliant idea!
Yeah these 99% scores are extreme but you don't have to be a pot-smoking socialist to side more with Sanders than Clinton. I'd be surprised if they did a similar anonymous poll on issues with the majority of voters and Clinton was in first place.Despite how I may wish this is true, this is a majority of posters on NeoGaf, a site known for its 18-35 demographics. With most users located in liberal/leftist areas of their countries.
Your percentage points are lower than mine, but the list of candidates are in nearly the same order. Getting both Paul and Sanders means you probably err more to leftist libertarian beliefs (similar to me).![]()
Not sure how I sided so much with both Sanders and Paul.
Kinda funny that there's no solid alignment with any of the candidates.
Also who the fuck is Ted Cruz? He seems like a cartoon villain.
Serious question - I get that this would affect you in terms of tax breaks, but why should the federal government continue to give you tax breaks? As in, why should churches in general receive tax breaks at all? Non-profits aren't (always) religious organizations, so I get their tax breaks. They're actively "doing" something for the community. Churches, arguably (and with some exceptions), contribute very little back to their community other than (spiritual?) support.
Funny, the 98% Sanders are the really terrifying ones.