Mainly the fact that he wasnt killed?
ISIS have been running round killing everyone that doesnt fit their particular branch of idealogy. Western journalists, foreign aid workers, Christians, Non-Sunni Muslims etc.
The area they are operating (Iraq, Syria and Lebanon) is predominantly Muslim, so of course it stands to reason most of the people being killed in this struggle are Muslims, namely those that follow Shia.
Hence why I suggested whoever shot that Vice documentary would had to have been a Muslim themselves, particularly Sunni otherwise they wouldnt have had a hope in hell of getting any footage. They'd have ended up with the other foreign aid workers and journalists awaiting beheading in some ransom video.
Secondly I suggested the pretext given for taking the footage and the interviews had to have been filmed under the pretext of a propaganda film to get permission to allow the filming to begin with. If they knew this was for a Western audience channel on youtube that exposed what sort of atrocities they were getting up to, do you think they would allow it?
I'm not sure what your comment about Saddam has to do with anything I said. Not sure what you were reaching for there.
This ex German politician was allowed in the state. Spent 10 days in Raqqa.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jürgen_Todenhöfer
This is his statement after his return and will publish more details at a later date.
http://justpaste.it/igwq
Basically its Al Qeadas turn to step up to the plate.
Do you mean to fight IS. AQ as a group are not really in conflict with IS. Nusra is in Syria but jolani is basically wanting his own Emirate rather than AQ central telling him to fight IS. In Yemen there doesn't seem to be fitna and AQ are not even in Iraq are they? It's more likely that AQ will end up giving bayah to Baghdadi eventually.