In your opinion. where it is going? Italy asked since years for help from the EU an never got it. Italy did way more than enough. You can not destroy a whole countries for the sake of others.Oh no, I don't like where is this going...
Italy is the country where I live at...
So they didn't slaughter a bunch and then toss the rest onto reservations?You may not like hearing it, but opposed to the modern narrative of evil European invaders killing every Indian they could find, but the European "conquest" of the Americas was mostly accomplished through the initial unintentional spread of disease.
Ok.Had the native population been more resilient to European disease, there never would have been the need to import slave workers from Africa.
So they didn't slaughter a bunch and then toss the rest onto reservations?
That makes it better?That was long after their population was decimated from disease.
That makes it better?
Better?
It happened. It isn't a value proposition.
That is just nature. Humans are animals. Extinction is eventual to all things. The better adapted survive.
I'm curious. In actual face to face conversation with, let's say, a black person around the topic of slavery or a Jewish person around the topic of genocide...have you tried voicing that line of reasoning? "It's just nature, the better adapted, humans are animals, etc etc".
Serious question.
I have yes. Europeans enslaved other Europeans look before the establishment of the slave trade. Genocides took place in history during periods of armed conflict long before World War 2. What makes Jews, Aboriginals, and Blacks so special?
I'm curious. In actual face to face conversation with, let's say, a black person around the topic of slavery or a Jewish person around the topic of genocide...have you tried voicing that line of reasoning? "It's just nature, the better adapted, humans are animals, etc etc".
Serious question.
Humans aren't animals and we haven't been subject to evolutionary pressure?
And what does the straight up industrial slaughter of people have to do with the depopulation of North America from the native's susceptibility to Eurasian disease?
And before anybody says I am a racist, I happen to be the son of a refugee and an immigrant.
I thought we were still on the topic of "So they didn't slaughter a bunch and then toss the rest onto reservations? " when I asked the question.
This is such a disingenuous argument and a poor analogy. My home is not my country.
I said this numerous times but it's so good seeing this new Gaf that doesn't seem like an asylum, instead reasonable people discuss things objectively.Avatar is a funny analogy because many people claimed the message was liberal (with a noble indigenous people protecting their land). I actually loved the movie, for what it's worth. Now, when Europe endures a real-life similar scenario we're labelled bad guys. From my point of view Europe's humanistic values born from the entire enlightenment era have been distorted, manipulated & turned against us by human traffickers, usurpers, lairs & other such criminals who want to change Europe's demographics in order to feed their own wealth & power. They throw images of African women & children crying on TV & expect all sense to be thrown out the window via emotional manipulation. It's psychotic. Remember, these same TV networks covered up the Cologne rapes & many other such incidents. Africans & Muslims illegally entering Europe = good, Europeans who want to preserve our land & way of life = bad. It's all over the mainstream media 24/7 & is now the 'official' stance of the EU.
Hungary is just the start of the pushback, i.e. normal folks who'll make a normal stand against this insanity.
i bet the people here who are are trying to be most accepting of these people coming in never had a surge of immigrants come and live in an area where they would either
Paging EviLore to come marvel at the fantastic dumpster fire that GAF is becoming as evidenced by this thread. It’s one thing to argue that perhaps the migrant situation could be handled better, but we literally got slavery/genocide apologists in this thread because “natural selection”
Wow. I mean, by that logic rape is “ok” too because the women being raped are weak and the men need to pass on their seed.
It’s really sad witnessing Gaf’s slow descent to madness. It feels like a lot of really fucked up threads have been getting closed lately like that fringy conspiracy bullshit thread a few days ago.
okGo ahead and quote someone who's saying things to make excuses for genocide and slavery. The only person making a big mental leap here is you. I'd love to hear you explain the actual logical reasoning you used to go from people saying "I'm glad european countries are finally appearing to consider the ramifications of accepting a large number of young males from completely different cultures" to "It's ok to rape women."
You want to know who actually thinks it's ok to rape women? No, of course you don't. The cognitive disonance you live with is astounding.
Jesus, people still bringing up the 'noble savage' trope to shame Europeans into accepting third world savages? The aboriginal populations of North America were backwards, savage, and not as noble as post-modernists say. Slavery in Canada was originally an aboriginal institution. Aboriginal tribes exterminated and enslaved each other long before the Europeans arrived. Instead of honouring treaty land... they should honour the taxpayers. We have given billions of dollars in aid to aboriginal groups, and most of this money is being funnelled by corrupt Tribal leaders. Nobody dares mention this though. Why not?
The second quote was in reference to someone else who had suggested these things happen because humans are animals. This is clearly not true, as many humans are capable of using their massively evolved brain functions to escape animalistic tendencies, especially overtime via the concept of civilization. That's what makes us humans. I think it is really interesting that the user in question seems to acknowledge that some populations are "backwards" (i.e aborigines) while others are more enlightened (i.e white people going by his history) and yet somehow people are animals and can't change or something.I have yes. Europeans enslaved other Europeans long before the establishment of the slave trade. Genocides took place in history during periods of armed conflict long before World War 2. What makes Jews, Aboriginals, and Blacks so special?
Give a white man a pile of bricks and he will create a city, give a black man a city and he will create a pile of bricks. Even before contact with the Europeans, Africans had lived in a resource rich land and did nothing with it. It is actually white's that face systemic racism in their own lands, as more and more we are catering to useless minorities that bring nothing but archaic religious philosophies and cling to historical slights that nearly every ethnic group has suffered from at some point in time.
ok
The second quote was in reference to someone else who had suggested these things happen because humans are animals. This is clearly not true, as many humans are capable of using their massively evolved brain functions to escape animalistic tendencies, especially overtime via the concept of civilization. That's what makes us humans. I think it is really interesting that the user in question seems to acknowledge that some populations are "backwards" (i.e aborigines) while others are more enlightened (i.e white people going by his history) and yet somehow people are animals and can't change or something.
Though I'm not surprised, since he is also responsible for this gem in a thread that was locked for being shockingly racist (can't direct quote from locked threads):
But sure I'm making big mental leaps.
EDIT: also you are making some big assumptions about me with the line "You want to know who actually thinks it's ok to rape women? No, of course you don't. The cognitive disonance you live with is astounding." You don't even know what my stance on certain issues are and you are jumping to conclusions.
Is it (((THE LEFT)))?Don't have to look hard on the internet to see who commonly employs this tactic.
Great, you found one person saying things you believe are controversial in this whole thread. The content of their posts certainly don't pass for slavery/genocide apologism, however. They can correct me if I'm wrong but the meaning I take from those quotes is "Slavery and genocide existed in places and times that were before the inlfuence of white colonialization and also between same race societies".
I honestly don't know what mental leaps you're taking, you still made no attempt to actually explain any logical reasoning you used to go from the posts in this thread to "rape is ok". I'm absolutely making assumptions about you based on the obvious slant of your posts. What else do you expect? Your idea of a gotcha is linking people you disagree with to rapists. Don't have to look hard on the internet to see who commonly employs this tactic.
Is it (((THE LEFT)))?
Wow, some of the people in this thread...
Try to imagine yourself in the migrants' situation.
Many of us normal hard working folk are simply sick and tired of being propagandized, otherized, grouped together, and being groomed for collective punishment. White people are not 'exceptional', they never exploited minorities. The elites and royal houses (crown corporations) exploited and enslaved aboriginal populations while peasants in European countries were starved, beaten, and raped. Now, transnational corporations destroy countries in the Middle East, egged on by Leftist news outlets (they all were on board with 'weapons of mass destruction' in 2002-2003), and supported by Champagne socialists (and yet corporately owned) democrats/liberals that transport the former enemy population into our countries while they spew the principles of multiculturalism in an effort to eradicate their own guilt. And who pays for this when the previous enemy is transported to his new home? The law abiding citizens.
I'm going to assume that you just missed the poster's patently racist post history, and that you are otherwise capable of understanding that what someone says must be taken in context of who they are as a person. However, that doesn't even matter to be honest. The idea or commentary itself that slavery/genocide existed between cultures/races because of survival pressures is kind of irrelevant because it doesn't excuse or lessen the effects that they are having on certain populations today. As humans, we have evolved to a point where we are largely able to overcome the base/destructive aspects of survival pressures (tribalism, racism, killing/fucking whatever we want) because we have benefited much more by forming stable societies that promote more harmonious relationships (which in and of itself is just another result of survival pressures).
The rape comment is a bit of a stretch, to be fair, but my point was to illustrate the pointlessness of saying things like "well people did X back then because natural selection" in response to some societal ill because we could make the same argument now, and it really wouldn't make sense. We know better as a society, which is why we make laws against these things (killing, raping, stealing, etc) and hold people accountable when they do them and try to accommodate victims where possible.
As far as the actual topic at hand, I really do think that the best way to approach this migrant situation is to have a comprehensive effort aimed at truly fixing whatever is broken in their home country. That's easier said than done, of course, but you cannot simply have people going to different countries as the only solution. My stance on religion in general (especially the Abrahamic ones like Islam, Christianity, etc) is that they are a burden to society because they place limits on critical thinking by promoting absolute obedience to authority, they are generally not open to change, and they are too subjective in interpretation. I'll just leave it at that because this is not a religion thread.
Soros himself is cutting me a check as we speak.
This is a hysterical and completely out of touch with reality recollection of history. We're blaming liberals for the conflicts in the middle east? Seriously?
News flash: leftists didn’t support Obama’s drone attacks.Yes, yes, Bush went into Iraq; however, it was under Obama and Clinton that Libya, Syria, and Ukraine were destabilized. Remember the quote, "We came, We saw, He died"? The destruction of Syria and Libya led to the creation of over 60 million migrants. In addition, the beloved Obama dropped more bombs via drones than any other president before him while espousing the ideals of multiculturalism. Some of us aren't fooled anymore, and some of us are beginning to find a voice against those that would subvert us with their socialist propaganda.
You're right, most 'leftists' had no idea he was even doing them. They still supported him though.News flash: leftists didn’t support Obama’s drone attacks.
The USA has a two party system. When your options are "bomb with drones" and "wage full on war", what do you expect?You're right, most 'leftists' had no idea he was even doing them. They still supported him though.
The USA has a two party system. When your options are "bomb with drones" and "wage full on war", what do you expect?
So you saying 'leftists never knew' was bullshit then? Because clearly people knew that 'war' and 'drone strikes' are the only two options, right? So they just didn't care because it was Obamy.The USA has a two party system. When your options are "bomb with drones" and "wage full on war", what do you expect?
Uh, youre the one that said “leftists never knew“. Since it came from you, yeah I’m guessing it’s bullshit.So you saying 'leftists never knew' was bullshit then? Because clearly people knew that 'war' and 'drone strikes' are the only two options, right? So they just didn't care because it was Obamy.
And your country is not only yours, there are many people who think we should not have open borders.
Why don't you apply your ideas to the place that belongs to you? It's so simple.
News flash: leftists didn’t support Obama’s drone attacks.
This is a hysterical and completely out of touch with reality recollection of history. We're blaming liberals for the conflicts in the middle east? Seriously?
“Rules for Thee and Not for Me,” and anyway, that was the past.Speaking of Europe and years gone by, I find it ironic that there is such a resistance to immigration given its Imperialist history. The shoe is on the other foot now, and it fits.
“Rules for Thee and Not for Me,” and anyway, that was the past.
Payback is a motherfucker.What are you even arguing for? Untrammelled Islamic migration into Europe? Eye for an eye?
Payback is a motherfucker.
Bro, I'm black AND gay on NEOGAF.COM in 2018. Any presumption of credibility I might have had on this board is laughable.And there goes any credibility you potentially had.