I stopped reading at the post that described 19th century European immigrants to America (the disease-ridden, criminally enterprising, lower class folks that flooded in and met extreme prejudice from nativist Americans) as a superior class of immigrant to the African migrants coming into Europe today.
The intellectually dishonest posters will try to claim that post was about cultural differences, but even a fucking idiot could perceive the racial code attached to it.
edit:
also, i dont believe you asked this question in good faith, just like the majority of the responses to my original post, so I'll leave you all to your winks and dog whistles.
Intellectually dishonest, good faith, dog whistles... checking off all those boxes while also resorting to insults. As much as you want to believe it wasn't in good faith, I can assure you that I have no desire to spend any time trolling strangers online. Ok, that's a lie, I do on occasion and this wasn't one of those occasions nor is this the platform for it. I am, however, interested in understanding the points of view that may or may not align with my own - neither of us have really delved into this topic much, at least not yet.
To expand on that, and getting back to the topic at hand, I have no trouble understanding the sentiments on display in the story that kicked this thread off or some of the responses to it because my family comes from that southern portion of Italy (Calabria, specifically) and I've spent a few months there myself (decades ago, unfortunately). I also happen to be a first generation Canadian living in Montreal, where we've been dealing with a migrant crisis of our own the last couple of years, sometimes dealing with upwards of 500 illegal/undocumented/insert-your-preferred-term-here border crossings a day. Some stay right here in Montreal, some get sent back to their country of origin, the majority apparently wind up settling in other parts of Canada, but the federal government has refused to help pay for the costs associated with adequately dealing with all those migrants.
We don't live in a Utopian society, obviously, and it's undoubtedly safe to say that a sizable percentage of the population doesn't live comfortably - paycheck to paycheck, large debts, crime and other worries of that nature - so when you start siphoning hundreds of millions of their taxpayer dollars to help migrants that, in large part, don't even settle in the province/state/country you can imagine why some of the locals might not line up to welcome them at the border with open arms and lavish parties. That's without even taking the migrants' into consideration - it's not their fault if the local governments haven't met the needs of their citizens, but to continue down that path, if the governments haven't met the needs of their people you can surely see why spending large sums of money dealing with migrants could prove to be a public relations disaster, one that could remove those governments from power.
Some people have been in favor of globalism for a long time, open borders and all, and yet decades later they apparently still haven't figured out that to play on a global stage requires implementing global laws, immigration and taxation among them. What good is globalism to me if some of the biggest employers and taxpayers are using the world stage to evade taxes and to hire thousands of workers in third world conditions? It needs work, a LOT of it, though it's not something I see playing out over the course of my lifetime considering the pace at which this has been moving.