I've grown confused and frustrated with the "moe culture", and I need to vent.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like Parodius, but if you're over a certain age of think it weird to see that on your book shelf.

Fair enough I suppose. Its probably more odd because they are displayed next to football stuff than anything. Again though not really sure what age has to do with it. Teenagers cant afford these figures. They are 70- 90$ each on average and can go upwards of 200$
 
I thought K-ON was one of the few anime with mainstream appeal in Japan and had a large female fanbase. Can anyone confirm or deny?

From what I know it does. The show itself isn't really bad or anything, it was just my go-two example because the fan reception to it was kind of a perfect storm of examples.
 
People need to understand that the anime industry is focused on Japan's audience/markets and that anime brought over to the West back in the 80s/90s were specifically handpicked to suit a Western audience. "Moe Culture" didn't suddenly spring out of nowhere, since the advent of anime in Japan it has existed and since then has grown to mainstream. So the notion that "Anime is shit now compared to the awesomesauce anime we had back then" is a fallacy, the shit has always outnumbered the good, and this is not exclusive to anime in particular, see video games.


Yea I'm aware of this, but I was under the impression that stuff like Moe , even in Japan, didn't define anime back then the way it does now.
 
You've got it backwards.

Moe is mainstream.

It's the "great shows and films" that are niche. Why? Because they don't sell. They're not particularly profitable. Their overseas appeal is a pittance, because foreign markets have generally cooled down on anime compared to the situation in 90s.

Moe stuff gets made because it sells and puts food on the table.

The industry doesn't dictate what sells and what doesn't, anymore than Hollywood singlehandedly chooses what kinds of movies Americans like. It's a dialog, with audiences' tastes (and the audiences themselves) shifting and the industry responding to those shifts and feeding those tastes. Want to really know why moe came to dominate anime?

It depends on what level you're talking about. "Moe" doesn't put anime among the top 10 tv ratings.

Series like One Piece, Dragonball Kai, Detective Conan, Pokemon, Yokai Watch and Naruto are much bigger than any "moe" series. However, "moe" does resonate well with dvd/blu-ray buyers though, and that's where you often get shows like those reigning.

Still, even "moe" covers a bunch of different things. Shows about "cute girls doing cute things" seem to be becoming smaller and smaller in number nowadays, after a temporary rise with K-ON. There are still many harem based on light novels and manga though, which of course are filled with cute girls, or just "cute girl" designs in series that could easily do away with them completely without losing anything. Still, I don't see that ever going away in that sense since there's an audience that wants that.
 
If you're the one making the point that this stuff isn't always sexual I'm not sure if posting an array of figures including a girl in a playboy bunny costume complete with fishnets, another who appears to be lifting up her skirt, and yet another who's peeling her stockings off while looking seductively at the viewer really helps your case

If thats what you see then more power to you. I see cute figures. There are far more provocative figures I could buy if I wanted to go the fanservice route.
I guess the Charlotte in a bunnysuit might be sexual but its an adorable pose based on existing art. Just unfortunate that bunnygirls have such negative association besides just looking cute.
then again I have a vastly different view of the world than most so who knows really.
 
Yea I'm aware of this, but I was under the impression that stuff like Moe , even in Japan, didn't define anime back then the way it does now.

True, but on the the flipside of the same coin, the shows from back then that Western audiences praise didn't define anime back then either.

Are you in a relationship? boyfriend/girlfriend husband/wife? or have you been in one lately?

Sorry is this NeoGAF? I must have stumbled into the shitty part of the Internet again.
 
Nope. I hope to stay single forever if possible.
i have no need for a relationship.
friends are whats important.

RG0BS1U.jpg


Because people who get into relationships tend to abandon their hobbies?

never said that, I am married and collect many things and have many hobbies, you get less time definitely for hobbies with wife and kids but no need to abandon hobbies.
 
If thats what you see then more power to you. I see cute figures. There are far more provocative figures I could buy if I wanted to go the fanservice route.
I guess the Charlotte in a bunnysuit might be sexual but its an adorable pose based on existing art. Just unfortunate that bunnygirls have such negative association besides just looking cute.
then again I have a vastly different view of the world than most so who knows really.

Cajun, I've come to believe that you're sincere in really truly just viewing this stuff differently from most people. But I think that's almost unique, even among anime fans. I don't think most other people who would buy that bunny-girl figure or the others would be oblivious to some of the sexual overtones.

(although really, the one second from the right is "just cute"?)
 
Some series can be a bit too pandering, but that's what sells and allows the creators to try out different show ideas without going under. Plenty of quality "regular" anime like Mushi-Shi, JoJo, HxH, and Ping Pong are still being made and are still popular. I'm only barely paying attention to what comes out each season, but there's plenty of non-moe content out there to try. I think some (most) out of it can become awkward and bad, but there's also some shows out there that fit the moe description, but are still regarded as high quality content by many.

Top tier right here

Stop caring about what other people like and why they like it, and focus on why you like it

PS

Lz5Rlyx.png

My Everyday Blunt?

http://youtu.be/dBqMxvqLQuw

http://youtu.be/o2TO5atI4rU
 
Cajun, I've come to believe that you're sincere in really truly just viewing this stuff differently from most people. But I think that's almost unique, even among anime fans. I don't think most other people who would buy that bunny-girl figure or the others would be oblivious to some of the sexual overtones.

Im just a weird person I guess. I genuinely just love cuteness. Im actually less inclined to enjoy cuteness if its overtly sexual. I guess its not the common way this stuff is viewed but consider that Im a straight guy but people trust me completely around their GFs. I have very very low sexual impulse of any kind. Like I can see attraction even in a character designed as such to be that way but it doesnt affect me. Instead its just like "she is cute and Id like to just hug/protect her". Maybe deep down thats a slight attraction but not something super strong to where Id ever bother acting on it. Hurting someone for. My own benefit is absolutely out of the question.

I could almost be like those fedora neckbeard people except whereas they expect to be repaid with sex, I just want to be nice to people and make them happy. For me the cute characters and outfits are an innocent thing even if they arent intended to be. Some of these figures have "cast off" skirts and stuff but I never display them in less than full clothing because I honestly dont like them seen that way. It prevents me from buying a lot of figures actually.

Like you said Im really not the common case here so maybe Im just talking in circles.
still, I think people should be given the benefit of doubt unless they demonstrate otherwise.
 
Geez, this thread. Blanket statements and judgements everywhere.

I consider myself an anime fan, and while I have noticed the proliferation of the "moé" (though that term seems to be used for all kinds of things and I prefer to just call that kind of anime pandering to a certain audience), I haven't found it taking over the entire medium like a lot of people here claim.

Heck, I feel like I have too much anime to watch as of late. Mushi-shi, Yu-Gi-Oh Arc-V, Attack on Titan, JoJo's Bizarre Adventure. Among my friends, all I hear about is JJBA and that anime is about as un-moé as you can get. Anime News Network has addressed the question of moé quite a few times, if I remember right. It'd probably help to go read what that site has to say about it, but I imagine a lot of people here aren't interested in understanding it and would rather just condemn people for it.

I just kind of ignore the more obviously pandering stuff. I don't think moé has taken over JRPGs, either. The art style in games has changed, but it isn't some unilateral shift to moé.

People also seem to forget that we only get a fraction of Japan's anime output in the West. So judging the entire medium based on what we can see here seems silly to me.

A lot of posts in this thread seem to boil down to, "There's this thing that I find disturbing in this wider medium and because it has an audience, that damns the entire medium." To each their own, I guess?
 
Well I tried to actually watch an episode of k-on to see wtf people are talking about (my last venture was the world only god knows which lasted like 4mins) but apparently it's popular enough to not be on Crunchy Roll, so unless it's somewhere else not piratey I'll just skip this venture and continue to be clueless.
 
Well I tried to actually watch an episode of k-on to see wtf people are talking about (my last venture was the world only god knows which lasted like 4mins) but apparently it's popular enough to not be on Crunchy Roll, so unless it's somewhere else not piratey I'll just skip this venture and continue to be clueless.

It's a 2010 show, and anything before 2012 is woefully lacking on CR since they've only been legit and getting a huge number of titles for a few years. Hulu is the only site I know of that streams K-On.
 
Im just a weird person I guess. I genuinely just love cuteness. Im actually less inclined to enjoy cuteness if its overtly sexual. I guess its not the common way this stuff is viewed but consider that Im a straight guy but people trust me completely around their GFs. I have very very low sexual impulse of any kind. Like I can see attraction even in a character designed as such to be that way but it doesnt affect me. Instead its just like "she is cute and Id like to just hug/protect her". Maybe deep down thats a slight attraction but not something super strong to where Id ever bother acting on it. Hurting someone for. My own benefit is absolutely out of the question.
.

I mean, you say this, but those figures you posted are cute but express enough overt sexuality to bother me and a lot of other people. I don't know how much other media you watch, but that level of "sexiness" in everything isn't par for the course everywhere else like it is in enthusiast anime merchandise. Its really jarring for a lot of us to look at that kind of stuff.
 
(although really, the one second from the right is "just cute"?)

Shiro?
I love the colors of the figure and the cute pose (she is supposed to be holding a chesspiece in her hand)
Also really like the base design and her crown. Very pretty figure that looks excellent in good lighting. There are some paint flaws which was disappointing.
i like a lot of shows and oftentimes I have to resort to the only figures available, which often have fanservicey qualities. Its unfortunate but again that stuff is what sells. If I want the figure I put up with the fanservice.
Its the same with maids and cat ears and gothic lolita outfits. I love these things because i find them extremely cute but Im not oblivious to them also being fetish fuel. I can see how someone who doesnt know me might see these figures and think Im some sexual deviant. I can see that point.
 
People also seem to forget that we only get a fraction of Japan's anime output in the West. So judging the entire medium based on what we can see here seems silly to me.

We get nearly everything Japan does in North America. Unless you mean the amount shown on TV here pales in comparison...but the stuff that actually airs here isn't really what people in this thread are talking about so I'm not sure what the point is.
 
I may come to this thread later and tell people how I feel.

But this thread is making me really sad. And hurting my Christmas.
I do think there are some problems with moe culture. But I think that a lot of people are very negative and judgmental about things that don't deserve it. And it's really upsetting to read things like this.
 
Series like One Piece, Dragonball Kai, Detective Conan, Pokemon, Yokai Watch and Naruto are much bigger than any "moe" series. However, "moe" does resonate well with dvd/blu-ray buyers though, and that's where you often get shows like those reigning.

Most of these were grandfathered in, weren't they? They're hardly the norm when you look at the new series debuting each year. It's like saying The Simpsons's continued popularity is indicative that American audiences are still receptive to all-age cartoons, which couldn't be further from the truth. These shows also have an ongoing source material that both feeds and gets fed by their popularity, which isn't true of, say, IM@S. At least, not to nearly the same extent as Pokemon or One Piece.
 
I mean, you say this, but those figures you posted are cute but express enough overt sexuality to bother me and a lot of other people. I don't know how much other media you watch, but that level of "sexiness" in everything isn't par for the course everywhere else like it is in enthusiast anime merchandise. Its really jarring for a lot of us to look at that kind of stuff.

Yes I know. If I could find "sfw" versions of these figures I would buy those. However its these or nothing because this is what companies make. I didnt buy a certain Santa catgirl figure because she is barely wearing panties and a skimpy top. The pose and cat ears are squeeworthy but I dont want the sexuality. So I didnt buy it. It was disappointing.
But at least the characters arent naked or something.
I dont see the appeal in those kinds of figures and they arent made for me. Again though, since I like certain things that are basically fetishistic to most people Im gonna be stuck with figures that are fetishistic in other ways. I can display them in the least provocative pose possible but most will still see it.
 
I remember when anime was defaulted to magical fantastic adventures, giant ass kicking robots, crazy fights, insane head tripping sci-fi, etc. Moe wasn't a thing in people's minds and there wasn't nearly as much of an "animu is shit" sentiment.
I'm guessing you watched Toonami as a kid, right?
 
As for what else I watch it ranges from older anime to sci fi movies and even courtroom dramas as well as football (american) and quite an array of non japanese cartoons. I even watch my little pony on occasion. Basically whatever piques my interest really. Moe/cute anime is only one thing. I do spend a lot of money on it though.
 
I don't know, I am more so angered and annoyed by every anime featuring the "big boobed" woman who all of the other characters fear will take their man. For a while I thought it was a thing common with mainstream rom coms until I was introduced to more obscure stuff. It leads me to believe the term "loli" is beginning to represent even of age characters by US standards just by the size of their chest.

That is just my input though.
 
We get nearly everything Japan does in North America. Unless you mean the amount shown on TV here pales in comparison...but the stuff that actually airs here isn't really what people in this thread are talking about so I'm not sure what the point is.

What? We do not get nearly everything Japan does in North America. Companies that publish anime mention all the time that they make pretty deliberate choices on what to bring here, which means that a lot isn't brought here. It's a similar case for manga, and I imagine it's worse after Borders went out of business a few years ago.

So people in this thread are looking at what airs in Japan and might not have come here and are using that to decide to not watch anime or to judge its audience? My point was that it's pretty easy to ignore this stuff. People are just choosing to damn all of anime based on the fact that something they don't like (and I'm not criticizing that part as it's a matter of taste) has an audience.
 
If I'm going to be honest, I tend to steer clear of these threads because they rapidly devolve into people indiscriminately (and inaccurately) slagging off a variety of modern shows (or just anime in general) and saying that anime used to be cool in the 80's/90's. Or people vaguely talk about "art styles". There tends to be a number of comments from people who aren't particularly familiar with the medium and only really know about a handful of shows but still feel like the understand the entire anime industry. That's not very interesting to wade through, especially when counter-arguments tend to get dismissed out of hand and those with the most information or experience with the subject get ignored. Circular logic and one-sided conversations are often the norm. As such, I hesitated to even post in here but I feel like at least offering a brief explanation for the OP because it's Christmas after all.

I'm glad to see that OP has at least put some effort into coming up with this thread before creating it. That's better than most other threads we've had on this subject so I wanted to at least highlight that accomplishment.

Still, reading this thread makes me feel like I've fallen through a crack in time back to 2010 when the great fear sweeping the net was that 'moe' would kill anime, or something to that effect. It's been awhile since I've read or heard any discussion on the subject because that, by and large, it seemed like that whole argument 'went away' when it turned out to be fundamentally wrong. I mean, we've discussed this in 2010, twice, 2012, and even 2013 and I feel that pretty much everything that needs to be said on this subject has probably been said. The biggest problem with all these discussions seems to be that no-one can come to an agreed definition of "moe", which leads to everyone
talking at cross purposes until the thread gets locked.

So, accepting that we'll never agree on what 'moe' is I'll briefly respond to the OP's concerns. Now, the OP doesn't really lay out exactly what his/her concerns are specifically so I'm just going to extrapolate what I think the main queries are. Please let me know if I am characterising your queries:

Q: There seems to be an abundance of media focusing on 'cute' girls, this seems concerning.
A: There certainly is, although how much of a concern it should be depends on the material in question. It's pretty important to to not conflate Japan's enjoyment of cute things with sexualised otaku material e.g. videogames, anime etc. This is where the slipperiness of the term 'moe' becomes problematic, because you could apply that label to complete innocent works such as K-On! which feature 'cute girls' or works that aren't innocent at all e.g. Prisma Illya. Saying both shows are "moe" tells you practically nothing about the works, their intended audiences or their content.

As such, you shouldn't be concerned about "the media" in general so much as specific types of representation.

Q: Narrowing down the above question, what's the deal with all the properties that apparently sexualise depictions of young girls? Why do they exist in such a high volume?
A: Media and related merchandise tends to be extremely expensive in Japan so it's only the most hardcore fans who every buy it. There's a fairly reliable niche of consumers who want to buy that kind of content even at those high prices. A number of companies serve this market because it's a reliable way to make money. It's that simple.

Q: What's the intent of the people creating this kind of media, what are they looking to convey with their work?
A: The anime industry is a business. Shows exist to fill advertising slots, sell more copies of the material they are based off (e.g. manga, novels etc) or to sell merchandise. They're products and most of the time they are adaptations so questions of "what is the story looking to accomplish" don't even factor in because those creative decisions were made with the original content.

Now, there are obviously plenty of shows that have strong creative vision behind them but those generally are not the creepy shows that sexualise young girls.

Q: What about the role of women in the industry?
A: Women play a significant role in animation industry, at all levels. This is probably the time with the most women working in the field.

Q: What about works apparently aimed at women that are really for men?
A: Most works, as I mentioned above, are adaptations. It's generally clear from the magazine that the original works are published in what the intended audience e.g. if you're reading Berserk in Young Animal you know that magazine is targeted at older men. If you're reading Rose of Versailles in Margaret you know that's a magazine for teenage girls. Even beyond such indicators a works art style will often make it clear who it's aimed at.

Now, there used to be a time when stories aimed at girls weren't even primarily written by women but by men. However, that all changed in the 70's and now, by and large, women are writing those stories.

Q: There doesn't seem to be much critical push back against this kind of content?
A: I've been reading people complain about this for years so I don't really know where you are coming from on this one. There's enough people who enjoy this kind of content to make it a sustainable business model, which is why it persists. It would only go away if the audience disappeared. Discussions on the subject abound but it will have zero impact on the industry at large.

[Implicit Conclusion]: The treatment of women in Japanese media is pretty bad. Having little girls be sexualised in this fashion certainly doesn't help. This kind of content certainly doesn't help women's role in Japanese society. Therefore the people making this content should reconsider what they're doing because it's bad because it has a detrimental impact on women.
Response: Well, you're not wrong to say that but, as I said above, it's essentially just a business model. It will continue until it is no longer profitable.

Women in Japan face a number of struggles and sexism is a still extremely prevalent in that country. This is the unfortunate reality of the situation.

Now, if you have any other queries, please let me know.

It's unfortunate that no one has responded to this post which actually addressed the specific concerns of the OP. I guess that's why most of us don't really bother these days.
 
Most of these were grandfathered in, weren't they? They're hardly the norm when you look at the new series debuting each year. It's like saying The Simpsons's continued popularity is indicative that American audiences are still receptive to all-age cartoons, which couldn't be further from the truth. These shows also have an ongoing source material that both feeds and gets fed by their popularity, which isn't true of, say, IM@S. At least, not to nearly the same extent as Pokemon or One Piece.

Huh? But Idom@ster has a source material too? It's not different from Pokemon in that regard.

The main issue is that shows focused on DVD/Blu-ray are much shorter. They're generally 13 episode season nowadays, and almost universally have decreasing sales after each season. So, there's a trend of more and more new shows to replace them, rather than long running series. Still, Yokai Watch is fairly new. Detective Conan also got a spin-off last season (Magic Kaitou) that's performing almost as good as the main Conan show. Shounen Jump has announced a few new animated series for next year, like Assassination Classroom, which have the potential to be long running too if any of them succeed.

The entire reason we have many shows starting every reason is because there's this audience for these disc sales based shows though. If you look at annual anime lists from the 90s, they were generally significantly smaller. Even if you look at just DVD/Blu-Ray focused series though, there's variety. One of the biggest shows this season in disc sales seems to be Psychopass 2 somehow, which is pretty mediocre, but nothing "moe"-like.
 
I don't know, I am more so angered and annoyed by every anime featuring the "big boobed" woman who all of the other characters fear will take their man. For a while I thought it was a thing common with mainstream rom coms until I was introduced to more obscure stuff. It leads me to believe the term "loli" is beginning to represent even of age characters by US standards just by the size of their chest.

That is just my input though.

I really cant stand that trope either.
and yes, even of age women are being called lolis if they have small chests. A lot of women are ashamed of not having large chests and this sort of shaming probably makes it worse.
 
Shows ran for longer in the 90s because a larger proportion of TV anime was intended for (younger) kids. A lot of the stuff that airs late-nights today was only available on VHS and Laserdisc releases in the 80s and early 90s, and this started to change around when Eva got popular in 95/96.
 
Well it literally means budding or sprouting. It can be taken in numerous ways - "budding" girl or "sprouting" feelings.

No. No it really doesn't. Maybe the dictonairy definition to the use of 萌 is that, but the meaning of it has been taken and used by anime otaku to mean something completely different. Moe is a feeling, a feeling invoked by anything at all. It could be cute, it could be exciting or it could be a sad feeling, but moe is a feeling that can't really be quantified into words.

There seems to be a lot of people in this thread both missusing the term moe to try and strengthen their arguments and also the term fanservice. There's fanservice in everything and everything. Fanservice doesn't have to be anything sexual, even a reference to another show in TV for example is fanservice. Fanservice is something that "services" or caters to fans of something.
 
Huh? But Idom@ster has a source material too? It's not different from Pokemon in that regard.

The main issue is that shows focused on DVD/Blu-ray are much shorter. They're generally 13 episode season nowadays, and almost universally have decreasing sales after each season. So, there's a trend of more and more new shows to replace them, rather than long running series. Still, Yokai Watch is fairly new. Detective Conan also got a spin-off last season (Magic Kaitou) that's performing almost as good as the main Conan show. Shounen Jump has announced a few new animated series for next year, like Assassination Classroom, which have the potential to be long running too if any of them succeed. The entire reason we have many shows starting every reason is because there's this audience for discs. If you look at annual anime lists from the 90s, they were generally significantly smaller.

90s had more OVAs and 26 episode series. Today there are many more 10-13 episode ones. However I dont think the overall situation has changed that much. Long running series are always going on. Right now there is stuff like Toriko and Fairy Tail.
 
No. No it really doesn't. Maybe the dictonairy definition to the use of 萌 is that, but the meaning of it has been taken and used by anime otaku to mean something completely different. Moe is a feeling, a feeling invoked by anything at all. It could be cute, it could be exciting or it could be a sad feeling, but moe is a feeling that can't really be quantified into words.

There seems to be a lot of people in this thread both missusing the term moe to try and strengthen their arguments and also the term fanservice. There's fanservice in everything and everything. Fanservice doesn't have to be anything sexual, even a reference to another show in TV for example is fanservice. Fanservice is something that "services" or caters to fans of something.

This Kenshiro, and Guts are moe.
 
so could someone clear something up for me

isn't moe like all that uguu~~ stuff? I always thought of it was a character type. Like that one girl in Clannad is moe, but the show as a whole is not.

I've never seen K-On but there is a difference between Kawaii and moe right? Kawaii is just the culture of propagating cuteness and femininity. Which was gained traction with girls in Japan back in the 80's. So a lot of animes depict girls who propagate that kawaii archetype. Just how the west has scene or emo girls right?

Moe is all that toddler regressive behavior that characters put on, or so I thought. I never saw nichijou as moe because the whole show is kids acting older than they are, and taking the piss.
 
google image rei dakimakura*

SIF9D.gif
lol I did the same

It's a 2010 show, and anything before 2012 is woefully lacking on CR since they've only been legit and getting a huge number of titles for a few years. Hulu is the only site I know of that streams K-On.
Well I switched to Madoka Magic girl, which doesn't seem too bad 15mins in. I mean there was the naked transformation thing in the intro but that's... I dunno, it's hard to explain. I feel like in some way there is a "loveliness of the sexual form" appreciation expressed in these things that can be done separately from "I want to bang" intentions. This show also seems to be in a celebration of a concept of "girlhood" in a similar manner with the characterization. Things can be one or the other or mixed together, but I just don't think human nature is so simplistic in any given thing that you can instantly equate depictions to desires or "intentions if given the chance."

In some of these reported otaku obsessives that the industry is apparently pandering to, can it also come from some dysfunction difference of sexuality in how it is received and manifests in a person socially, as some kind of stand-in for normal relations that spin out into greater extremes of their base constructs of admirations for cuteness/loveliness/innocence/sexuality which end up combined in depictions? Apparently so, but while that may be demonstrative of a social problem difference, I don't see why that would directly equate to or present a social danger of predatory deviance to warrant legitimate concern without evidence.

I mean, in a normal relationship you will at times view your partner with sexual desire, other times admire their loveliness, other times perhaps the innocent sides of their character, and at different moments these may mix and match. Art tends to do all these things as well, but there are ideas of "classy" ways that specify acceptable borders and contexts which make them appropriate. These animes seems to be throwing it all together and turning the dial up to louder levels, and that may be demonstrative of a rejection or escape from normal rules of subtlety and contexts of real life sociability, but I don't really see it as fundamentally different from what anyone else does all the time with only stronger compartmentalization, perhaps to safeguard social roles and contexts from getting blurred as they have them more prominently in their life focus whereas these otaku may hold themselves more distanced or isolated and not need that.

...hm, didn't expect to become otaku defence force but I guess it's just my rationalizing/chill personality in this case.
 
I really cant stand that trope either.
and yes, even of age women are being called lolis if they have small chests. A lot of women are ashamed of not having large chests and this sort of shaming probably makes it worse.

Well even in the shows that feature this, the characters with less exaggerated bodies are sometimes critical of their own features for being lesser. In the sort of way that says, "When I am older I will look more like that."

This is sad because getting older doesn't always mean getting boobs or a curvy body. I just don't think it is a good lesson, or even good comedy. It dispels most the negative feelings I have toward loli culture.
 
Yes I know. If I could find "sfw" versions of these figures I would buy those. However its these or nothing because this is what companies make. I didnt buy a certain Santa catgirl figure because she is barely wearing panties and a skimpy top. The pose and cat ears are squeeworthy but I dont want the sexuality. So I didnt buy it. It was disappointing.
But at least the characters arent naked or something.
I dont see the appeal in those kinds of figures and they arent made for me. Again though, since I like certain things that are basically fetishistic to most people Im gonna be stuck with figures that are fetishistic in other ways. I can display them in the least provocative pose possible but most will still see it.

As for what else I watch it ranges from older anime to sci fi movies and even courtroom dramas as well as football (american) and quite an array of non japanese cartoons. I even watch my little pony on occasion. Basically whatever piques my interest really. Moe/cute anime is only one thing. I do spend a lot of money on it though.
I mean, do you get then why those of us who do look into this enthusiast scene with its merchandise and its fan communities and see how much of this stuff is sexually charged (or at least expressing desire in some way) and go "....well now"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom