D
Deleted member 47027
Unconfirmed Member
I've always done this but you don't see me making a fuss about it
You're right. You just go absent for long periods of time and we miss you.
I've always done this but you don't see me making a fuss about it
Whether you like reigns or not, it was a bad rumble. No cool spots, super lazy commentary, and no sense of unpredictability.
Couldn't predict, but I wasn't surprisedWell, I certainly didn't predict how shittily they would eliminate Bryan, Ziggler, Ambrose and Wyatt.
Whether you like reigns or not, it was a bad rumble. No cool spots, super lazy commentary, and no sense of unpredictability.
What about Goldberg, what gift did he have?You can't manufacture star quality. Stone Cold had the gift of the gab, as did Rock and Hogan, even Cena to an extent. Also, ignoring for a second how horrid his written promos have been, if Reigns were the sort of guy who could go out there and entertain the crowd off-the-cuff, he would've been allowed to do so by now. They don't have faith in him on the mic, so why should anyone watching care in what he has to say? Frankly, I'm more invested in Reigns struggle to find some charisma than I am in his 'struggle' to reach the top of the WWE mountain.
He was.Was swagger even in the rumble?
What about Goldberg, what gift did he have?
Was swagger even in the rumble?
No Man God, it was the streak. Fans love a good streak.Unbelieveable physical charisma? An excellent entrance? The ability to say "Who's Next?" and snarl?
What about Goldberg, what gift did he have?
Unbelieveable physical charisma? An excellent entrance? The ability to say "Who's Next?" and snarl?
I suppose so. Bryan was on his way, but due to unfortunate circumstances it fell apart. Then other previous winners like Batista, Del Rio, Cener, Orton, pasty ass, just all felt went nowhere due to shitty booking or produced anything memorable.They've already done a wonderful job over the years of making the Rumble seem pointless. Foley was right when he said it's on its way to becoming Survivor Series-level of who gives a fuck.
I just needed a reason to to post that.
is this real ass wrasslegaf?
you can just hear that lisp
You can't manufacture star quality. Stone Cold had the gift of the gab, as did Rock and Hogan, even Cena to an extent. Also, ignoring for a second how horrid his written promos have been, if Reigns were the sort of guy who could go out there and entertain the crowd off-the-cuff, he would've been allowed to do so by now. They don't have faith in him on the mic, so why should anyone watching care in what he has to say? Frankly, I'm more invested in Reigns struggle to find some charisma than I am in his 'struggle' to reach the top of the WWE mountain.
I just needed a reason to to post that.
I'd say the biggest issue WWE has is that they don't have a heel who fans just really don't like. You kind of need that to help get your faces over. Lesnar's reactions have ranged from indifference to half the crowd being behind him because he's against Cena. Add that with them repeating last year's mistake in a way, and you're left with an obvious result.
It's why I was said they should've rolled with Batista all the way after Wrestlemania last year. Fans hated him so much that you pretty much have a great opportunity to use all that hate, and build an entire angle where you can eventually elevate someone.
you can kinda see it tbh
I did what I thought would be a fun combination of drugs last night but ended up feeling nothing more than giddiness. The Royal Rumble was still more disappointing.
you guys wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if bryan won the rumble.
I like the guy but he would be terrible as the face of the company.
I want to see him as a heel again.
I think BatistaGAF will come round to Roman Reigns in six to seven months time. You're just in a rebellious phase.
you guys wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if bryan won the rumble.
I like the guy but he would be terrible as the face of the company.
I want to see him as a heel again.
Why would you want to see Roman Reigns squashing Daniel Bryan for 3 PPVs in a row?
you guys wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if bryan won the rumble.
I like the guy but he would be terrible as the face of the company.
I want to see him as a heel again.
you guys wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if bryan won the rumble.
I like the guy but he would be terrible as the face of the company.
I want to see him as a heel again.
What about Goldberg, what gift did he have?
I don't like reign at all. I'd rather see bryan as a heel squash cena on ppv
I just needed a reason to to post that.
I just needed a reason to to post that.
You know your state of heels are in sad shape when two of the top five are Kane and Big Show.I'd say the biggest issue WWE has is that they don't have a heel who fans just really don't like. You kind of need that to help get your faces over. Lesnar's reactions have ranged from indifference to half the crowd being behind him because he's against Cena. Add that with them repeating last year's mistake in a way, and you're left with an obvious result.
It's why I was said they should've rolled with Batista all the way after Wrestlemania last year. Fans hated him so much that you pretty much have a great opportunity to use all that hate, and build an entire angle where you can eventually elevate someone. Rather than wasting time with Lesnar, they should've convinced Big Dave and built the main event angle from that. You'd still have Lesnar to build another angle too.
It's business. Maximise your opportunities. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.