Hmmm If I told you Japan as a nation never surrendered, would you consider that propaganda?
Now granted some are yakuza in disguise, some are not that crazy as you think.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/街宣右翼
Take a look at Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender.
Funny the
English wiki doesn't have the full text but the
Japanese one has the English and Japanese text.
Potsdam Declaration Article 13. Japan only agreed to an "unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces."
Second of all, because Japan never agreed to unconditional surrender, the occupying forces broke
Convention respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land article 43.
Why, because under the Meiji constitution, democracy and although with limitation freedom of speech, the right to assemble, and freedom of religion were guaranteed.
These things are taught in university level law books. Legit constitution text books.
Now, there are war crimes which some people deny for example Nanking, and cruelty towards captured soldiers etc. And being allies with Nazi Germany is a real stain, inexcusable misjudgment by the Japanese leaders.
But lets be real here, Class A (crimes against peace) war criminals weren't executed, only those also charged with Class B (conventional war crimes) were. No Japanese only convicted of Class A crimes were executed. Those who protest Yasukuni Shrine for enshrining Class A criminals because they are Class A criminals have no clue what they're talking about. Class C (crimes against humanity) wasn't applied against the Japanese. If you want to criticize Yasukuni Shrine for its revisionist history go right ahead. And glorifying Kamikaze, too childish for me.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1021/p01s04-woap.html (sees inaccesible)
http://ratio.sakura.ne.jp/archives/2005/10/24225940/ (the full copy of above article)
The point is this, Japan did commit war crimes. However, the US committed far greater atrocities against the Japanese, which to this day the perpetrators have not answered for. 1944.3.10 over 100,000
civilian deaths in Tokyo, just to name one. That's those "propaganda" peps sentiment. When put in proper and historically correct context, the sentiment makes sense. Compare that to the Japanese who think, a member of the voluntary SDF crying about possible deployment to war is a legit reason to oppose a security law, which content is normal for a nation to have. I'd agree with people opposing war, but bringing up a SDF member crying as a reason for anything is pure nonsense.
I'll just end this by saying this, Obama started sending US delegates to A-bomb memorials for the first time, back in '14 now two years counting. Japan on the other hand, can't even specify who was at fault for the A-bomb in their memorials. Guess who freaked out in 2007 when he was asked if he would demand US an apology regarding A-bomb war crimes, Abe.