TheThreadsThatBindUs
Member
WB made that two years ago. GAF hated it because it had that evil thing called co-op, but it sold pretty well.
It wasn't made by Rocksteady.
Are you referring to the Platinum Games one? That was pretty terribad.
WB made that two years ago. GAF hated it because it had that evil thing called co-op, but it sold pretty well.
It wasn't made by Rocksteady.
Are you referring to the Platinum Games one? That was pretty terribad.
Jim Ryan's side hustle, working as a consultant at Warner Bros/Rocksteady.Seven years. Seven fucking years of development on this trash game in this trash genre. By a studio known for single player games, who had previously released three single player games in that same amount of time.
Imagine the kind of financial damage Rocksteady is going to incur when this game flops and imagine instead where they would be if they had released two or three single player games instead.
To fans of GAAS, when people say GAAS is going to kill the industry, this is what we mean.
Apparently Destiny’s not doing so hot any more. Destruction AllStars was so unappealing from the very first announcement that it’s completely forgotten.How so?
Trust me. I remember the Arkham Knight threads. A large portion of people bitching and moaning about the Batmobile. That gameplay looks like a Picasso painting next to this drivel. And I was someone who was rooting for this game when it was first announced.
Anyone who says this gameplay looks better than the Arkham games needs to get in for an MRI as soon as possible.
No person, or organization, changes unless they have to. The SP Batman games were getting more expensive to make with each installment and their sales ceiling wasn't rising at a healthy enough rate.
They were forced to jump off that train because it led to a 1,000ft cliff.
I'm just going by what I've read and heard. Yes, "differences" exist, but from what I've gathered they're not substantial for a lot of players which is the problem. Or they didn't feel like they were.There is. Harley is more like a Batman character with a grapple hook and faster traversal. Deadshot has his sniper rifle and better at ranged. Shark is more melee with charges and ground slam attacks. Boomerang is the middle balanced of the characters.
I'm just going by what I've read and heard. Yes, "differences" exist, but from what I've gathered they're not substantial for a lot of players which is the problem. Or they didn't feel like they were.
Won't know anything until I, or we, play it ourselves. But for now, that's all we have are these previews and impressions.
So instead of staying on the train and selling millions of copies, they waste seven or so years worth of development time and money only to jump off the cliff.
Brilliant strategy.
Well in that case that's fair! But it's clearly a to each their own situation as others haven't felt the same way. Between that or the gameplay just not being, well, "fun." But I'll just figure it for myself if I decide to play it or not, lol.I played the Alpha. What I described is how they played in the Alpha.
Trend-chasing driven games development. Sounds about right with the way things are. I don't care for Scheier but he is right here.
Unlike Hollywood videogames don't come off a conveyor belt.
Doesn’t really matter. And a huge percent of consumers are…let’s be generous and call them “misinformed”. Bear in mind too that “most” consumers are not the more hardcore, more informed people that frequent forums like this. They are much more casual and their exposure to gaming news that may drive their purchase decisions is much more surface level and thus much more prone to being misinformed. One stat I’ve always found fascinating is the 70% of Americans will share an article on social media having only read the headline, and given headlines are often intentionally structured to trigger things like anger, fear, hatred (sadly it’s those emotions that yield the highest engagement) they’ll often intentionally misconstrued the actual context of an article as a way to drive clicks. A false equivalence was often drawn by gaming media between guardians and avengers, and that false equivalence could very well be the only thing a lot of potential customers saw, and is an opinion you still see expressed by people even today long after release. Doesn’t mean it’s not dumb, but it is what it is, and the end result is the same, guardians was a great game that bombed hard, in part due to its association with the failure of avengers, and pretty much killed the studio in the process (well, got them sold for peanuts to embracer..who themselves are now borderline bankrupt), which absolutely sucked as I loved their games.If someone is stupid enough to assume something about a game and not actually research if it's true or not, maybe they shouldn't be playing games at all.
Yup. For gamers who dont like Sweet Baby, they are the type of company that tells the world every key project they do too.It's Baby Bingo time once again folks. Looks like we're onto a double winner tonight you lucky duckys
The old guard that used to make your favourite games?
THEY'RE DEAD.
Brilliant logic.
"They were presented with two risky strategies and the strategy they chose was risky."
No way!
Yup. For gamers who dont like Sweet Baby, they are the type of company that tells the world every key project they do too.
To fans of GAAS, when people say GAAS is going to kill the industry, this is what we mean.
Oh my good man..Sweetbaby had input on The Crew?! A racing game?
Oh my good man..
You so need to play it. It's pure cringe like you wouldnt believe. My whole face inverted after an hour. I actually couldn't take anymore and uninstalled it.
Indeed, but I have the feeling that it is good not only for the us gamers, but for french, spanish, german too.So if this game flops hard, it's great news for us gamers,
Citation needed. Where those kinds of GAAS? Because as far as I know, the GAAS making all the money are Fortnite, Destiny, Rocket League, COD, GTA, FIFA, Genshin Impact, and Roblox. And everyone else is trying to get a piece of their pies, which is a fruitless endeavor, because the audience for those games have already sunk hundreds or thousands of dollars and hours into their GAAS of choice, so good luck peeling them away from that level of investment.Features of most successful GAAS:
- Story driven
- Mostly single-player (MP is an added feature, not the core of the game)
-Likeable characters.
-Well-thought worldbuilding (so you can add layer after layer without screwing things up)
- Top-notch production values.
I'm pretty sure none of the above may be found in this Suicide Squad game.
No, GAAS is not killing the industry. Clueless developers and execs are. This is as wrong as saying that there is "superhero fatigue" in cinema. No, it's bad movie fatigue. Don't blame the genre for the incompetence of creators.
Trust me. I remember the Arkham Knight threads. A large portion of people bitching and moaning about the Batmobile. That gameplay looks like a Picasso painting next to this drivel. And I was someone who was rooting for this game when it was first announced.
Anyone who says this gameplay looks better than the Arkham games needs to get in for an MRI as soon as possible.
I’m fine if it’s not superior to AC even with the Batmobile. It’s still miles better than what’s being shown here.I don't trust you. Played loads of times Batman Arkham Knight and the batmobile is really the issue there.
If you remove the batmobile, AK is superior to AC.
The game is being hated purely because it's GaaS, nothing more.
Anthem actually had good gameplay though. I don't think this game even has that.Its Anthem all over again. Time really is a flat circle.
Oh my good man..
You so need to play it. It's pure cringe like you wouldnt believe. My whole face inverted after an hour. I actually couldn't take anymore and uninstalled it.
Pretty sure NPD had it as the 17th best selling game of the year, hardly inspiring considering 2022 was barren.WB made that two years ago. GAF hated it because it had that evil thing called co-op, but it sold pretty well.
Extensive story so they say.This could sink the studio. Hopefully not and hopefully they get the next 4 years to make a batman game again.
I actually thought SS was a single player title. Will it have a campaign at least?
They released it with a $100 founders pack, and then said thanks for playing the beta and deleted the game.
Surprising Fans, WB's Smash Bros.-Like Shutters Until 2024 With No Refunds
The free-to-play MultiVersus has been bleeding players since its July 2022 launchkotaku.com
I'm talking about Gotham Knights. It's a TMNT game 100%:
Nightwing = Leo
Red Hood = Raph
Robin = Mikey
Batgirl = Donnie