• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

John Stewart on Crossfire @ 4:30pm est.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sergenth

Member
Fifty said:
It's hilarious watching Bowtie and his fake laughter try and get through it without yelling.

Yeah, after seeing it again, Tucker did do good in recovering/blocking what Stewart had said. When Jon called him a dick though, I think he was geniuinely happy/entertained about it.

Begala was getting into the vibe though... he really looked and sounded like he asked Jon the most important question in the world, the "who is easier to make fun of" one. He so wanted to be the "real" debater that Jon was asking for. Hah! I'll watch tomorrow's Crossfire and see if both of them shrugged it off. After that... no more Crossfire. Tough Crowd is funnier.
 

Dilbert

Member
Wow. WOW. I have always loved Jon Stewart, but this is on a whole different level. Speaking truth in someone else's house takes a lot of balls.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Sergenth said:
I'll watch tomorrow's Crossfire and see if both of them shrugged it off. After that... no more Crossfire. Tough Crowd is funnier.
You'll have to wait until Monday, there's no Crossfire on weekends. That makes it less likely that there'll be any mention as well.
 

Socreges

Banned
Jon Stewart is a true American hero. That was awesome.


Tucker Carlson: Jon, what do you think of the Bill O'Reilly vibrator story?

Stewart: I'm sorry? I don't. What do you think? Where's your moral outrage?

Tucker Carlson: (laughs) Oh I don't have any.

Stewart (fake grin): Oh I know. *turns to Begala*

:lol


I'm glad that Loki had a (at least somewhat) change of heart from watching the video because I couldn't have disagreed with him more.
 

Azih

Member
That was sad to watch, the Crossfire guys refused to address the issue that Stewart was desperately trying to bring up.
 
This just in...

sq-jon-stewart-daily-show-c.jpg


You got owned.

God damn, Jon fucking rules. He doesn't pounce very often, but when he does, he is going to cut you to shreds.

Oh, Loki, the secondary reason I think Jon hates Crossfire is because they employ Bob Novak, which I believe he hates with a fiery passion. You can catch the hint on the show when he calls Novak the biggest douche in the world. This is because of that whole outtitng of a CIA agent that was still in operation.
 

Mandark

Small balls, big fun!
My favorite part was when Stewart said that the people working for Bush and Kerry believed that their candidate would be better, but were making false arguments to support them. Both Begala and Carlson acted shocked, SHOCKED that he would say this, when it's such a no-brainer. It gave the impression of two men with cushy jobs that don't want to let anyone find out how unconstructive they are.

Carlson's whole defense seemed to be that anyone who criticizes the job he's doing should do it for him. I don't think he had a clue how ridiculous he looked constantly justifying his performance by contrasting it with that of a comedian.

As for Stewart's appearance... he's got a baby now. He ain't getting any sleep.
 

pestul

Member
STEWART: In terms of absurdity and their world matching up to the one that -- you know, it was interesting. President Bush was saying, John Kerry's rhetoric doesn't match his record.

But I've heard President Bush describe his record. His record doesn't match his record.
:lol
 

Brannon

Member
I saw the thread topic and though it was a hoax; Crossfire wouldn't be that stupid.

Now I just watched the whole thing, and I can't agree more. WTF was Crossfire thinking...

On another note, they said nothing about the book, but guess who's going to get the book today? Yay me!
 

Matlock

Banned
DJ Brannon said:
On another note, they said nothing about the book, but guess who's going to get the book today? Yay me!

BEGALA: Welcome back to CROSSFIRE. We are joined by Comedy Central's Jon Stewart, host of "The Daily Show" and author of No. 1 bestseller, "America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction."
 

Brannon

Member
Need to clarify; I meant in that they didn't address anything in the book, just the title. The rest was Jon killing Crossfire and Crossfire patching the wounds.
 

Azih

Member
Well if Jon had played ball and been the happy comedian riffing on the vibrator story, then they would have talked about the book in one of the segments.
 

ge-man

Member
I haven't witnessed ownage like this since that time I saw Janeane Garofalo literally destroy Tony Snow everytime he tried to misrepresent her opinion during an interview Fox Sunday Morning. That was another excellent example of a pundit/journalist completely underestimating their guest.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
DJ Brannon said:
Need to clarify; I meant in that they didn't address anything in the book, just the title. The rest was Jon killing Crossfire and Crossfire patching the wounds.
Let's face it though, Jon Stewart proving that he's a smart and intelligent person who knows what he's talking about was a better plugging for the book than if they'd just joked around about it and talked about his (and the Daily Show writers') motivation in writing it.
 
Dan said:
Let's face it though, Jon Stewart proving that he's a smart and intelligent person who knows what he's talking about was a better plugging for the book than if they'd just joked around about it and talked about his (and the Daily Show writers') motivation in writing it.

Yea, I thought the exact same thing. I have every intent of picking up his book now. I don't think that would've been the case if it weren't for that show.
 

Hournda

Member
Actually I have to say Jon Stewart did partially fail in trying to make his points on Crossfire. He attacked the Crossfire people for being knee-jerk partisan hacks and said that shows like Crossfire epitomize everything that's wrong with American politics today (which is all TRUE), but where he failed is to cite examples and give proof of that. He's going on a show run by beltway establishment politicos and someone comes on and attacks the very way they do things. Their natural reaction is to be defensive and combative. If Stewart had actually explained what he was saying instead of just "you guys are hacks" "you guys are what's wrong with politics today" then he could have been more effective. Still, his message was spot on and I applaud him for it. I just wish he had explained it better to the Crossfire people and to the audience.
 

Socreges

Banned
Hournda said:
Actually I have to say Jon Stewart did partially fail in trying to make his points on Crossfire. He attacked the Crossfire people for being knee-jerk partisan hacks and said that shows like Crossfire epitomize everything that's wrong with American politics today (which is all TRUE), but where he failed is to cite examples and give proof of that. He's going on a show run by beltway establishment politicos and someone comes on and attacks the very way they do things. Their natural reaction is to be defensive and combative. If Stewart had actually explained what he was saying instead of just "you guys are hacks" "you guys are what's wrong with politics today" then he could have been more effective. Still, his message was spot on and I applaud him for it. I just wish he had explained it better to the Crossfire people and to the audience.
Maybe he didn't think examples were necessary? They never actually said "that's not true". They just tried to excuse WHY they were hacks.
 

Ristamar

Member
Socreges said:
Maybe he didn't think examples were necessary? They never actually said "that's not true". They just tried to excuse WHY they were hacks.

Yeah, it's not like examples were needed. It's blatantly obvious after seeing 5 minutes of any given Crossfire. It's like arguing someone said that the sunny afternoon sky is blue but gave no proof to back it up.
 

Belfast

Member
Hournda said:
Actually I have to say Jon Stewart did partially fail in trying to make his points on Crossfire. He attacked the Crossfire people for being knee-jerk partisan hacks and said that shows like Crossfire epitomize everything that's wrong with American politics today (which is all TRUE), but where he failed is to cite examples and give proof of that. He's going on a show run by beltway establishment politicos and someone comes on and attacks the very way they do things. Their natural reaction is to be defensive and combative. If Stewart had actually explained what he was saying instead of just "you guys are hacks" "you guys are what's wrong with politics today" then he could have been more effective. Still, his message was spot on and I applaud him for it. I just wish he had explained it better to the Crossfire people and to the audience.

Hell Begala and Carlson were making asses of themselves right then and there. What more do you need? Besides, with Bowtie trying to dodge/change the suhject/talk over Jon the whole time how do you have time to come with examples? Jon could barely get out what he was trying to say and he could only hammer his point home through repetition.
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
Hournda said:
Actually I have to say Jon Stewart did partially fail in trying to make his points on Crossfire. He attacked the Crossfire people for being knee-jerk partisan hacks and said that shows like Crossfire epitomize everything that's wrong with American politics today (which is all TRUE), but where he failed is to cite examples and give proof of that. He's going on a show run by beltway establishment politicos and someone comes on and attacks the very way they do things. Their natural reaction is to be defensive and combative. If Stewart had actually explained what he was saying instead of just "you guys are hacks" "you guys are what's wrong with politics today" then he could have been more effective. Still, his message was spot on and I applaud him for it. I just wish he had explained it better to the Crossfire people and to the audience.
Exactly what I said, and I agree.
 
Hournda said:
Actually I have to say Jon Stewart did partially fail in trying to make his points on Crossfire. He attacked the Crossfire people for being knee-jerk partisan hacks and said that shows like Crossfire epitomize everything that's wrong with American politics today (which is all TRUE), but where he failed is to cite examples and give proof of that. He's going on a show run by beltway establishment politicos and someone comes on and attacks the very way they do things. Their natural reaction is to be defensive and combative. If Stewart had actually explained what he was saying instead of just "you guys are hacks" "you guys are what's wrong with politics today" then he could have been more effective. Still, his message was spot on and I applaud him for it. I just wish he had explained it better to the Crossfire people and to the audience.

Judging by their reactions, it looked like it was hard for him even to get out what he DID say. I don't think he was given any sort of chance to give examples. He looked like he was heading in that direction a few times, but got cut off.
 

Stele

Holds a little red book
I can't believe I just watched that clip with the commercials and everything, and all I have to say is, Loki, what the hell are you talking about? Stewart didn't blow up or anything. Maybe he doesn't talk like you type, but that's not a bad thing at all.
 

Pochacco

asking dangerous questions
Thanks for posting the clip guys.
Great stuff.

The more I think about Stewart's message, the more I agree with him.
He totally owned those CNN guys - so much so that they (and it seems the audience) had no idea what was really going on.

Still...
...there's a part of me that says that Stewart himself is part of the media that he calls "hacks" during this segment. The difference between him and CNN is that his "Daily Show" is a mock-news show (hosted on Commedy Central no less). I know that makes all the difference, since his crusade seems to be against illegitimate real "news" personalities, but something still feels off. I mean, it doesn't seem right that he gets all this respect for being an intelligent guy and all (which he obviously is), but gets to hide behind the "my show is just a commedy mock-news show" argument whenever someone disses him.

Again though, I really do agree with what he said.
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
^ But is is a comedy mock-news show, and even then, I sometimes see him posing tough hard-hitting questions that almost nobody else does.
 

fart

Savant
attn: tucker carlson

jon stewart is a professional comedian. you are a professional journalist. mr stewart is not the one dodging responsibility, YOU are.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Pochacco said:
...there's a part of me that says that Stewart himself is part of the media that he calls "hacks" during this segment. The difference between him and CNN is that his "Daily Show" is a mock-news show (hosted on Commedy Central no less). I know that makes all the difference, since his crusade seems to be against illegitimate real "news" personalities, but something still feels off. I mean, it doesn't seem right that he gets all this respect for being an intelligent guy and all (which he obviously is), but gets to hide behind the "my show is just a commedy mock-news show" argument whenever someone disses him.
Again, I'll state that I swear I once read that The Daily Show had been declared an official news source for legal purposes but that it was also still protected until parody law.

But anyway, if you watch The Daily Show at all it should be fairly obvious that Stewart often does not play softball with political guests. He really does ask some real questions and rather frequently he'll pursue them when they dodge answering. The Kerry interview was an exception, not the rule. Is he always as hard-hitting as he could be? No, but he's not what Tucker Carlson tried to portray him as either.
 

Loki

Count of Concision
Stele said:
I can't believe I just watched that clip with the commercials and everything, and all I have to say is, Loki, what the hell are you talking about? Stewart didn't blow up or anything. Maybe he doesn't talk like you type, but that's not a bad thing at all.

Did you happen to miss my subsequent posts AFTER I had seen the video? The original post(s) were made based solely on the transcript, where it was much harder to get a read on certain things.


And I don't appreciate your little dig at the end of the post. Unnecessary; my original comments had nothing to do with his diction.
 

etiolate

Banned
...there's a part of me that says that Stewart himself is part of the media that he calls "hacks" during this segment. The difference between him and CNN is that his "Daily Show" is a mock-news show (hosted on Commedy Central no less). I know that makes all the difference, since his crusade seems to be against illegitimate real "news" personalities, but something still feels off. I mean, it doesn't seem right that he gets all this respect for being an intelligent guy and all (which he obviously is), but gets to hide behind the "my show is just a commedy mock-news show" argument whenever someone disses him.

I love the Daily Show, but this does bug me. I am someone who thinks if you want something done, you best be able to do it yourself. Stewart gives the right side tough questions here and there, but thats about it. If he thinks the dichotomy of news shows is bad for the country, redundant PR babble, then don't offer up just one side yourself.

PS: The book is awesome.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
etiolate said:
I love the Daily Show, but this does bug me. I am someone who thinks if you want something done, you best be able to do it yourself. Stewart gives the right side tough questions here and there, but thats about it. If he thinks the dichotomy of news shows is bad for the country, redundant PR babble, then don't offer up just one side yourself.

PS: The book is awesome.
He runs a comedy show. It's not his job to be a journalist, it's theirs.
 

Chipopo

Banned
etiolate said:
I love the Daily Show, but this does bug me. I am someone who thinks if you want something done, you best be able to do it yourself. Stewart gives the right side tough questions here and there, but thats about it. If he thinks the dichotomy of news shows is bad for the country, redundant PR babble, then don't offer up just one side yourself. [/i]

The only reason this argument comes up is because people no longer even look at the news as seperate from entertainment. And that's fucking SCARY.

No, Jon Stewart does not need to practice what he preaches in this case. He has never labeled his show as a source of unbiased debate and a place to find legitimate news; quite the opposite in fact.

CNN however, has.

edit - sorry Hito.
 

GG-Duo

Member
Pochacco said:
Still...
...there's a part of me that says that Stewart himself is part of the media that he calls "hacks" during this segment. The difference between him and CNN is that his "Daily Show" is a mock-news show (hosted on Commedy Central no less). I know that makes all the difference, since his crusade seems to be against illegitimate real "news" personalities, but something still feels off. I mean, it doesn't seem right that he gets all this respect for being an intelligent guy and all (which he obviously is), but gets to hide behind the "my show is just a commedy mock-news show" argument whenever someone disses him.

On a certain level, I agree with you. There's a part of me that wished Jon Stewart would flip out and become all journalistic when Bill O'Reily or John Kerry goes on his show. Since his show's comedy feels very sincere and grounded in truth, it seems very weird that his interview segments are so "softball" in comparison.

But that point is only valid if Stewart's show is a legitimate news show that happens to be funny, I think. His point - and this is something that I agree with - is that it's a comedy show. It's a comedy show that is based on the news, just as Seinfeld was a show based on urban life (or, uh, nothing). So his show shouldn't have to pursue journalistic integrity, but pursue ... urm... hilarity. Crossfire, on the other hand, is failing on its intended purpose.
 

Memles

Member
Just got a chance to watch this after my brother made me download it for him, since I know how to use BitTorrent.

I am now spreading it across campus. This thing is awesome...just right on, to Stewart. He didn't need evidence; if he had started citing off facts they would have shut him down. Instead, he just kept on letting them provide NEW examples of their douchebaggery.
 
Jon Stewart did a great job. However, I disagree with him on one thing: I think that maybe CNN should start look to Comedy Central for its cues on journalistic integrity. I mean, Jon has it coming out the wazoo.
 

etiolate

Banned
He runs a comedy show. It's not his job to be a journalist, it's theirs.

If he really wants the point to be made, if he wants changes that bad, he is ultimately going to have to practice what he preaches. I think he is giving them an out by using his own out of "its only entertainment".
 

Chipopo

Banned
Don't you see the implications of a NEWS ORGANIZATION using the "It's just entertainment" excuse that Jon Stewart has?
 

Memles

Member
etiolate said:
If he really wants the point to be made, if he wants changes that bad, he is ultimately going to have to practice what he preaches. I think he is giving them an out by using his own out of "its only entertainment".

CNN vs. Comedy Central is what that issue comes down to.

They claim to be providing "debate". But, they don't. They don't take an issue, give each side its chance to talk, and then respond. They have bullshit, cliche-ridden arguments. They spew their respective party lines with such absolute bravado that it makes the head hurt.

They enters the "spin zones". Begala and Carlson's fellow douchebag republican Novak do live updates on their thoughts on the debates...and they are nothing but "Kerry was good here" or "Bush was great". Sure, when they feel they both went REALLY out of line, they pull out the old damage control card, but they are not defining the issues, or helping undecided members of the American public to DECIDE. They are just stroking the figurative cocks of their respective candidates. And I say they should shut the fuck up, and let ONE person moderate a daily debate between a member of each party, rather than political analysts spewing this bullshit.
 

Alcibiades

Member
in all fairness, I think Tucker Carlson and Bob Novak weren't really like this before, I used to love Crossfire and the shows they were on, but when Begala and Carville came in, it became a clash of the talking points and party-line cliches...

Novak and Carlson, separate from their Crossfire duties, have also been excellent journalists, and I'd say the same thing about liberals like Bill Press and Al Hunt, journalists there to talk about issues...

Begala and Carville are Clinton-era Democratic advisors that are party-line defenders, while the conservatives on the show (especially Bob Novak), are more conservative than they are Republicans. I'd argue that Begala and Carville are more Democrat than they are "liberals".

Novak has called Bush's administration and campaign "stupid", etc...

I can't stand to watch the show now cause it's so predictable, but mostly it's because the liberals on the show are a real turnoff, even though I think I agree with them on most social issues...

On the other hand, I love shows like Capital Gang and other discussion shows on PBS/C-Span that have liberals/Democrats on where it's actual discussion, but Crossfire became a joke the minute they decided to bring it political operatives and took away the journalists...
 

Makura

Member
I watched this. It was bizzarre.

Whats with the whole media watchdog screed John went into? The whining wasn't credible and he didn't succeed in backing up any of his accusations. Since when did John Stewart become the voice of media pontification? I think being the host of the Daily Show has gone to his head.

I actually feel like the popularity of the Daily Show has gone to everyones head over at Comedy Central. I think they've actually become what they started out making fun of so well. It used to be about mocking the absurdity of the seroiusness of news and everyday life. Now the show has become a self-absorbed, self-appointed cultural and political watchdog - they've become, as Stewarts puts it, "hacks".

So, forgive me if I laugh when I hear such indignancy coming from Stewart of all people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom