• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Johnny Depp Vs Amber Heard Defamation trial live

Hardensoul

Member
Just based on this 'doctor's statements I would find heard guilty if I was in the jury. She's super unlikable.
Attorney ask: Dr what about this here?
Dr says: not sure I don’t remember can I refer to my notes?
Attorney ask: what about this?
Dr says: not sure I don’t remember can I refer to my notes?

CAPS 5 Psyche evaluation
Attorney ask: why did you leave this blank? Why didn’t you make notes here?
Dr says: I have good memory I didn’t need to fill that in and didn’t need my hundreds of page notes!!

WTF!!! 😂 🤡🤡
 
Jesus Christ, this circus is still performing? When the fuck does it end?
This isn't a fucking "circus". We are watching an "expert witness" who has written the book on fucking over men in court be cross examined and exposed. There are at least 50 men she's directly impacted in personal testimony in the past, and god knows how many have been impacted through her teachings, instructions, books, conferences etc etc etc in her 30 years weaponizing this shit.

People writing this off as celebrity bullshit need to pay the fuck attention before commenting. Thank God Depp is a celebrity, because 1000's of men don't have his resources or profile and don't get the benefit of this bullshit being exposed to the public.
 

Catphish

Member
This isn't a fucking "circus". We are watching an "expert witness" who has written the book on fucking over men in court be cross examined and exposed. There are at least 50 men she's directly impacted in personal testimony in the past, and god knows how many have been impacted through her teachings, instructions, books, conferences etc etc etc in her 30 years weaponizing this shit.

People writing this off as celebrity bullshit need to pay the fuck attention before commenting. Thank God Depp is a celebrity, because 1000's of men don't have his resources or profile and don't get the benefit of this bullshit being exposed to the public.
Calm your tits, Patricia.

I'm not saying the case is meaningless. But it is a media circus, whether you care to admit it or not.
 
Last edited:

Hardensoul

Member
Calm your tits, Patricia.

I'm not saying the case is meaningless. But it is a media circus, whether you care to admit it or not.
We are glad this is televised because we rarely see these high profile cases live. Plus the subject of the male being the victim rarely being talked about.

If you have not seen the trial, inside that court room it’s far from a circus.

Edit: Short clips can not give the context of how professional these court trials are!
 
Last edited:

Catphish

Member
Apologies. I'll stand down. I'm not trying to invalidate or minimize the importance of the trial or people's interest in it. I'm aware of its significance.

I guess I'm just surprised that it's gone on this long, and am getting tired of hearing about it, to be frank.

But, that's my problem, not yours. Wasn't trying to shit up the thread. I'll see myself out.
 
Objection.....



Dance Wow GIF by SWR3
 

Heimdall_Xtreme

Hermen Hulst Fanclub's #1 Member
Attorney ask: Dr what about this here?
Dr says: not sure I don’t remember can I refer to my notes?
Attorney ask: what about this?
Dr says: not sure I don’t remember can I refer to my notes?

CAPS 5 Psyche evaluation
Attorney ask: why did you leave this blank? Why didn’t you make notes here?
Dr says: I have good memory I didn’t need to fill that in and didn’t need my hundreds of page notes!!

WTF!!! 😂 🤡🤡

what the hell? did they really say that?
 
Please Jesus let her testify
By all expert accounts I've been following, the entire case rests on her testifying. The fact the defense rolled out that expert witness first proves they have nothing, and everything is based on Ms Heard's statements.

These cases are both evidence based and a popularity contest. Right now Johnny has the evidence and popularity. If the defense had evidence they would've led with that - instead they led with a person who has clear bias towards men (she's literally never represented a male victim of abuse by a female), and this witness used Amber's self-reports and treating physician notes as "data" (treating physicians do not diagnose, do not infer crimes, and they are required to take their patient's statements as truth). This witness also tried to frame Ms Heard's violence as "reactive violence"........I could go on and on but it was disgusting. You can imagine how many men have had this same exact testimony used against them by lawyers in domestic abuse cases to try and flip the situation on them (this witness alone has testified over 50 times in 30 years).

Amber needs to win her case because her lawyers, the evidence, and witnesses so far have done her no favors.
 

Larlight

Member
By all expert accounts I've been following, the entire case rests on her testifying. The fact the defense rolled out that expert witness first proves they have nothing, and everything is based on Ms Heard's statements.

These cases are both evidence based and a popularity contest. Right now Johnny has the evidence and popularity. If the defense had evidence they would've led with that - instead they led with a person who has clear bias towards men (she's literally never represented a male victim of abuse by a female), and this witness used Amber's self-reports and treating physician notes as "data" (treating physicians do not diagnose, do not infer crimes, and they are required to take their patient's statements as truth). This witness also tried to frame Ms Heard's violence as "reactive violence"........I could go on and on but it was disgusting. You can imagine how many men have had this same exact testimony used against them by lawyers in domestic abuse cases to try and flip the situation on them (this witness alone has testified over 50 times in 30 years).

Amber needs to win her case because her lawyers, the evidence, and witnesses so far have done her no favors.

Yeah the bias the witness has shown is insane. I only was able to catch parts of her testimony but she continues to use female pronouns to refer to victims and male pronouns to refer to abuse. I mean it brings the question on whether she got paid to testify or not.
 
Yeah the bias the witness has shown is insane. I only was able to catch parts of her testimony but she continues to use female pronouns to refer to victims and male pronouns to refer to abuse. I mean it brings the question on whether she got paid to testify or not.
She did. $500 per hour.

Edit: Also she wasn't even preinterviewed - she already had a relationship with the defense. Unlike Dr Curry who was interviewed by Depp's legal team before being engaged.
 
Last edited:

Droxcy

Member
I went to elementary school in Yucca place is a shithole. Basically filled with a bunch of hipster brats now a days.
 

Heimdall_Xtreme

Hermen Hulst Fanclub's #1 Member
Yes, she left some questions blank! It’s so unprofessional for the Dr Hughes to leave those blank and leave out some important details in certain boxes.
With this Dr. I would be afraid to have consultations with him.

It is even an easy target for lawsuits.
 
This comes off as someone delivering a prepared statement. So far.....

Johnny came off as someone who was recalling a painful experience.......
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom