I mean, yeah, it's kind of lame, but in the end it's the same argument the trigger happy other side uses, usually without a court verdict: we as a (publisher/studio/project team, band, etc) don't want to be associated with what the public views as a problematic individual. I think in most cases, that's some circle jerk logic, but I'm willing to say Heard is probably one of the first examples I've seen of cancel culture done the (tentatively) correct way. She was found, in a court of law, to be guilty, and now, the court of public opinion can weigh in.