Support NeoGAF

[Konnor]

I honestly think Johnny was unlucky that the jury wasn't full of women. In my experience normal women are both way, WAY less sympathetic towards other women fake crying and they can easily spot bullshit about makeup being the magic solution to every imperfection, bruise, wound and so on on your face. Men on the other hand are usually more easily manipulated by fake tears and they don't know shit about makeup so there's a chance they will believe Heard's lies about her magic makeup solution.

 

[Dynasty8]

Amba get da FACK up! Amba get da FACK up! Amba get da FACK up!

 

[DJ12]

Guess that's godspeed for Johnny, then.

I honestly think this won't take very long. One of team has a lot of evidence, the other team has a lot of... things.

Just look at oj, American law is occasionally fucked.

Having said that camille is defo the johnny cochran in this ensemble of laywers, she'll probably get her name in the law firm title after this lol

 

[Saiyan-Rox]

Amazing closing arguments

Hopefully the jury see through all the lies she's told throughout the trial (especially the proven ones) shed commited perjury loads of times in this trial which probably won't lead to anything but if it helps Johnny win then it doesn't matter.

I will say though The Johnny Depp Show has been the most entertaining thing in years to watch and for all the wrong reasons.

 

[DeepEnigma]

Amba get da FACK up! Amba get da FACK up! Amba get da FACK up!

 

[NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt]

I honestly think Johnny was unlucky that the jury wasn't full of women. In my experience normal women are both way, WAY less sympathetic towards other women fake crying and they can easily spot bullshit about makeup being the magic solution to every imperfection, bruise, wound and so on on your face. Men on the other hand are usually more easily manipulated by fake tears and they don't know shit about makeup so there's a chance they will believe Heard's lies about her magic makeup solution.

Yeah if it's anything women can smell is when another women is bullshiting

I remember watching an episode of Judge Judy and it was a custody case.

The woman had fake tears and when she won the case, she had a sociopathic smile. That's when Judge Judy changed her decision and the guy won the case. Women aren't as easily swayed by their own gender than men.

 

[Nico_D]

Well, at least Johnny's got a role in the upcoming Beetlejuice 2... If that's true.

 

[Konnor]

The Elaine effect

 

[DragoonKain]

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

I feel like for some people this trial represents a course correction on the MeToo era that people have always hated and Depp winning this trial would be a big FU to all the “believe all women” crowd. Or am I reading the room incorrectly?

 

[Dr. Samuel Hayden]

Seems jurors #2 and #8 were dismissed. They were apparently some of the most sympathetic to Depp.

#5, the one who was at first sympathetic to Heard, is still there.

Not looking good.

 

[PaddyOCanager]

Final jury is 5 men 2 women.

Also, apparently some police just rushed to the courthouse? No idea what's going on

 

[DJ12]

Final jury is 5 men 2 women.

Also, apparently some police just rushed to the courthouse? No idea what's going on

Turd probs attacking Depp now he cannot use it as evidence.

 

[Bitmap Frogs]

So the jury is officially deliberating?

 

[Droxcy]

Actually, didn't she say she'd be quick? I'm so lost and can't remember a single thing that her side has said at this point.

Lol she did say she'd be quick and took 45 minutes and used all their time

 

[jonnyp]

 

[jonnyp]

Lol she did say she'd be quick and took 45 minutes and used all their time

And her rant was basically Charlie Day:

 

[Hugare]

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

I feel like for some people this trial represents a course correction on the MeToo era that people have always hated and Depp winning this trial would be a big FU to all the “believe all women” crowd. Or am I reading the room incorrectly?

For starters, Amber still has all of her fingers intact

She cut the top off one of his fingers, abused him physically, cheated on him, shit on his bed, and you would expect the guy to take it all without ever kicking some furniture and shit?

Him kicking some stuff in the kitchen and verbally saying shit to her is all that was proven as "abuse" from her legal team during trial

I was in an abusive relationship once for almost 2 years, so I'm personally invested on this trial.

My ex spread the rumor that I was physically abusive to her, making a lot of our closest friends to "cancel" me. When I confronted her about it, she told me that she lied because by doing that, "she would stop loving me easier by hating me"

So yeah, FU all the "all women" crowd

 

[PaddyOCanager]

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

I feel like for some people this trial represents a course correction on the MeToo era that people have always hated and Depp winning this trial would be a big FU to all the “believe all women” crowd. Or am I reading the room incorrectly?

Amber Heard spits in the face of MeToo and domestic abuse survivors - especially women. Go read what actual domestic abuse survivors are saying and come back here. Also, I will totally argue you on the fact of mutual abuse but you haven't watched a second of this trial so why bother.

 

[Konnor]

Amber Heard spits in the face of MeToo and domestic abuse survivors - especially women. Go read what actual domestic abuse survivors are saying and come back here. Also, I will totally argue you on the fact of mutual abuse but you haven't watched a second of this trial so why bother.

To be fair MeToo spits on the face of justice and survivors too. By creating a movement that bypasses the justice system and allows every nutjob to destroy the life of a man by accusing him of shit you end up with a public highly distrustful of victims and a justice system compromised.

 

[DragoonKain]

Amber Heard spits in the face of MeToo and domestic abuse survivors - especially women. Go read what actual domestic abuse survivors are saying and come back here. Also, I will totally argue you on the fact of mutual abuse but you haven't watched a second of this trial so why bother.

I’m not going to argue mutual abuse, that’s what the people I’ve heard talk about the trial have said. I have no opinion on it other than the mere curiosity of the strong rooting interest of those who don’t know what actually went on behind the scenes.

 

[jonnyp]

For starters, Amber still has all of her fingers intact

She cut the top off one of his fingers, abused him physically, cheated on him, shit on his bed, and you would expect the guy to take it all without ever kicking some furniture and shit?

Him kicking some stuff in the kitchen and verbally saying shit to her is all that was proven as "abuse" from her legal team during trial

I was in an abusive relationship once for almost 2 years, so I'm personally invested on this trial.

My ex spread the rumor that I was physically abusive to her, making a lot of our closest friends to "cancel" me. When I confronted her about it, she told me that she lied because by doing that, "she would stop loving me easier by hating me"

So yeah, FU all the "all women" crowd

Sorry to hear that. Echos my two years with my own Amber Heard. Lost friends but luckily she didn't manage to ruin my career or alienate any of my family. But I haven't been in a long term relationship since, I just cannot risk it anymore. I would rather be dead than experience anything remotely the same again.

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

I feel like for some people this trial represents a course correction on the MeToo era that people have always hated and Depp winning this trial would be a big FU to all the “believe all women” crowd. Or am I reading the room incorrectly?

With all due respect, then you shouldn't be posting. The reason why it was dysfunctional was because of AH. She was an abuser.

 

[Hugare]

Sorry to hear that. Echos my two years with my own Amber Heard. Lost friends but luckily she didn't manage to ruin my career or alienate any of my family. But I haven't been in a long term relationship since, I just cannot risk it anymore. I would rather be dead than experience anything remotely the same again.

Risk it, man

She was my first gf, and after I finally broke up with her, I had the same feelings that you are having right now. I would rather die alone before experiencing the same thing.

But then I found my 2nd gf, and she was the sweetest person. Now my 3rd (and hopefuly final) gf is just as sweet and caring.

There are decent people out there, dont lose hope

 

[PaddyOCanager]

To be fair MeToo spits on the face of justice and survivors too. By creating a movement that bypasses the justice system and allows every nutjob to destroy the life of a man by accusing him of shit you end up with a public highly distrustful of victims and a justice system compromised.

True I'm only pointing out this isn't about people having anti MeToo sentiment. A significant number of MeToo supporters are against Amber Heard too.

 

[Konnor]

For starters, Amber still has all of her fingers intact

She cut the top off one of his fingers, abused him physically, cheated on him, shit on his bed, and you would expect the guy to take it all without ever kicking some furniture and shit?

Him kicking some stuff in the kitchen and verbally saying shit to her is all that was proven as "abuse" from her legal team during trial

I was in an abusive relationship once for almost 2 years, so I'm personally invested on this trial.

My ex spread the rumor that I was physically abusive to her, making a lot of our closest friends to "cancel" me. When I confronted her about it, she told me that she lied because by doing that, "she would stop loving me easier by hating me"

So yeah, FU all the "all women" crowd

Rule #1 of dealing with crazy chicks nowadays is to record everything you can. Mine didn't accuse me of anything in the end but I had a lot of recorded calls and a few recorded fights that I would dump on social media the moment she accused me.

Btw this might sound excessive to some or you might think "this won't happen to me" but it's not a coincidence that in every fucking forum and community I've been there are stories like this from men that had their lives ruined by crazy chicks.

 

[jonnyp]

Lol shut the fuck up. I’m asking questions, dumbass. Don’t be a condescending cunt. With all due respect.

Maybe she was an abuser, I’m trying to understand more of the mindset of the people who care so much, which is why I’m asking in the first place.

Who's the condescending cunt here? Making a moronic statement when not having watched any of the trial?

I just told your ignorant ass why some of us care so much. Some of us have had our own Amber Heards. So without any due respect, shut the fuck up yourself.

 

[NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt]

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

I feel like for some people this trial represents a course correction on the MeToo era that people have always hated and Depp winning this trial would be a big FU to all the “believe all women” crowd. Or am I reading the room incorrectly?

Good that's how I feel about the MeToo Era. That movement is extremely sexist against men. So yeah I hope Depp wins this case

BTW I been watching the case when I can. Depp has a legitimate case here.

And yeah I had my own Amber Heard, so I know exactly what Depp is going through

 

[PaddyOCanager]

Maybe she was an abuser, I’m trying to understand more of the mindset of the people who care so much, which is why I’m asking in the first place.

People care because it's relatable. My gf was abused. What Amber did/is doing is disgusting. Men have suffered their own personal "Amber Heard" relationship and it's never been represented before. There has never been any support for men.

This case calls out the flaws in MeToo, highlights men's issues, shows how false claims damage actual victims.......the list is endless.

 

[Saber]

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

Did you miss the part where she cut Depp finger?
I would friendly suggest that you watch the entire trial, where is proven that everything she says its lies(it's not me saying that, the trial is LIVE on internet, watch and see the lawers unnmasking every lie she said).

And no offense, this argument of "both sides" is a lot of bullshit. She pratically destroyed his entire career. If you want a background of why this is being televised and why is so important, take what Amber said against Johnny as a starting point(the part where she mocks him of who gonna ever believe a man) . He wants to prove to the world how easy is to a woman destroy a man career and how far they have to go to prove her lies. It's the basically premise of "believe in women", not to mention she is doing disservice to real case of abuses.

 

[Lukaku's First Touch]

Do they need an unanimous vote?

 

[jonnyp]

Do they need an unanimous vote?

Yes, all 7 jurors have to agree.

 

[DragoonKain]

Who's the condescending cunt here? Making a moronic statement when not having watched any of the trial?

I just told your ignorant ass why some of us care so much. Some of us have had our own Amber Heards. So without any due respect, shut the fuck up yourself.

I didn't "make a statement" I asked a question. I said as an outsider and listening to podcast, that is the feeling I got, and I said if the feeling is wrong people can feel free to correct or offer insight. And for some reason people took offense to it and got all uppity. Making a statement would be "Anyone here who thinks Amber Heard isn't a victim has no clue what they're talking about." Which is not even remotely close to what I said. FFS.

That's precisely why I framed it that way because I didn't watch the trial. I want to understand the perspective of others.

So again, this is a question, not a statement. And not a rhetorical question, but a legitimate one. Do people feel they can discern whether or not someone is an abuser purely based off on a trial, testimony, and evidence? Or is there more to it than that?

And I shouldn't have snapped at you, btw. My apologies.

 

[kittoo]

Yes, all 7 jurors have to agree.

And what happens when 5 are on one side and 2 on the other? Johnny looses?

 

[Konnor]

I didn't "make a statement" I asked a question. I said as an outsider and listening to podcast, that is the feeling I got, and I said if the feeling is wrong people can feel free to correct or offer insight. And for some reason people took offense to it and got all uppity. Making a statement would be "Anyone here who thinks Amber Heard isn't a victim has no clue what they're talking about." Which is not even remotely close to what I said. FFS.

That's precisely why I framed it that way because I didn't watch the trial. I want to understand the perspective of others.

So again, this is a question, not a statement. And not a rhetorical question, but a legitimate one. Do people feel they can discern whether or not someone is an abuser purely based off on a trial, testimony, and evidence? Or is there more to it than that?

OBVIOUSLY. When Depp has a shitload of witnesses testifying that she was a violent nutjob and that they never seen her beaten and Heard only has her bullshit story parts of which have been repeatedly been proven fake with actual evidence then you can easily reach a conclusion.

 

[DragoonKain]

OBVIOUSLY. When Depp has a shitload of witnesses testifying that she was a violent nutjob and that they never seen her beaten and Heard only has her bullshit story parts of which have been repeatedly been proven fake with actual evidence then you can easily reach a conclusion.

The reason I ask is because while I've heard several people say the same thing as you, I've also heard a few say they believed Heard. Megyn Kelly, former attorney and who has always been very anti women claiming victim to capitalize on MeToo, is someone who said she believed every word Amber Heard said and thought from knowing abused women in the past and interviewing many, she was absolutely an abused woman. Granted, she thought Depp was abused as well.

Not saying she is the be all, end all, I've heard a few believe Heard was legitimately abused by Depp. And I'm not even saying they're right. I'm saying I've heard the opinions of people who have watched the trial and totally believed Heard. So it is a matter of an opinion to a degree, no?

 

[PaddyOCanager]

So again, this is a question, not a statement. And not a rhetorical question, but a legitimate one. Do people feel they can discern whether or not someone is an abuser purely based off on a trial, testimony, and evidence?

Yes.

But more importantly.....you're innocent until proven guilty correct? To what extent do you feel a man has to go to prove he didn't abuse a woman. All she has is her words. Depp has hard evidence she abused him.

 

[Revreign]

People care because it's relatable. My gf was abused. What Amber did/is doing is disgusting. Men have suffered their own personal "Amber Heard" relationship and it's never been represented before. There has never been any support for men.

This case calls out the flaws in MeToo, highlights men's issues, shows how false claims damage actual victims.......the list is endless.

This is well said. My ex was very much like Amber Heard. Claiming I was a controlling abuser. It caused me to lose everyone that was close to me during our divorce, but I kept my mouth shut and kept to myself. Thankfully she slowly showed everyone who she really is and people have realized the truth, much like this case is doing for Heard. I'm sure many like myself are interested in this case because we can emotionally relate to Depp.

 

[DJ12]

OBVIOUSLY. When Depp has a shitload of witnesses testifying that she was a violent nutjob and that they never seen her beaten and Heard only has her bullshit story parts of which have been repeatedly been proven fake with actual evidence then you can easily reach a conclusion.

Some of it by her best friends around the time this crap was happening according to Pinocchiturd.

 

[jufonuk]

Yes.

But more importantly.....you're innocent until proven guilty correct? To what extent do you feel a man has to go to prove he didn't abuse a woman. All she has is her words. Depp has hard evidence she abused him.

Used to be this way. But twitter happened

 

[Konnor]

The reason I ask is because while I've heard several people say the same thing as you, I've also heard a few say they believed Heard. Megyn Kelly, former attorney and who has always been very anti women claiming victim to capitalize on MeToo, is someone who said she believed every word Amber Heard said and thought from knowing abused women in the past and interviewing many, she was absolutely an abused woman. Granted, she thought Depp was abused as well.

Not saying she is the be all, end all, I've heard a few believe Heard was legitimately abused by Depp. And I'm not even saying they're right. I'm saying I've heard the opinions of people who have watched the trial and totally believed Heard. So it is a matter of an opinion to a degree, no?

Based on what? It is certainly not the evidence or the witnesses because that all point to her being the abuser. So it's only based on her "experience" with abuse victims and that interview? This chick is such a terrible actress that when she was describing her "abuse" on the stand she was fake crying without tears and this is the person she believed? She's either retarded or she has an angle.

 

[DragoonKain]

Yes.

But more importantly.....you're innocent until proven guilty correct? To what extent do you feel a man has to go to prove he didn't abuse a woman. All she has is her words. Depp has hard evidence she abused him.

Innocent until proven guilty at trial. I'm talking purely about the court of public opinion, where those same standards don't apply. Viewers can feel however they want about and trial, that's their prerogative.

Is there a reason people don't believe Heard's claims of abuse? Was it simply because they weren't backed up by substantial evidence or was it a "she didn't sound believable on the stand" thing... or a combination of both?

I know at a minimum she claimed she was forcefully vaginally searched by Depp for drugs and also he threw was it really expensive champagne bottles at her that he ordered? I forget the specifics, I've seen a bunch of clips here and there on the news and on random shows I watch and listen to. I listened to Rogan the other day and he basically said "She's full of shit, I can just tell" and he may be right, but have these been factually disputed at all.

 

[jonnyp]

I didn't "make a statement" I asked a question. I said as an outsider and listening to podcast, that is the feeling I got, and I said if the feeling is wrong people can feel free to correct or offer insight. And for some reason people took offense to it and got all uppity. Making a statement would be "Anyone here who thinks Amber Heard isn't a victim has no clue what they're talking about." Which is not even remotely close to what I said. FFS.

That's precisely why I framed it that way because I didn't watch the trial. I want to understand the perspective of others.

So again, this is a question, not a statement. And not a rhetorical question, but a legitimate one. Do people feel they can discern whether or not someone is an abuser purely based off on a trial, testimony, and evidence? Or is there more to it than that?

You didn't ask a question you said it basically seems like it was mutual abuse based on what little you have heard. I don't see one question mark in your first paragraph of your post. Which is why I respectfully asked you to not post. You decided to reply with complete disrespect.

So to answer your question, the following is a short summary of what the trial has uncovered:
1) evidence of her manipulating photos to increase redness of her cheek due to alleged abuse
2) using the same photo but claiming they are from different times of day - totally ridiculous. None of her photos can be validated as they are not raw files, from the original device but backups, and most of them have gone through an editor.
3) testimony from an officer she attacked her first spouse at an airport. she was actually arrested and had to appear in court but they were not allowed to get that in as it was deemed too prejudicial against her.
4) slapped her best friend, who is no longer her friend
5) used the same photo for two different incidents.
6) She admits to hitting him in multiple audio recordings.
7) she admitted to instigating fights and that she would get violent if he tried to leave to their couples therapist
8) caught lying about being in cahoots with TMZ.
9) staging a hoax in order to extort JD for spousal support, when she didn't get what she wanted, she went and got a temp restraining order against him when he wasn't even in California and wouldn't be for months and called TMZ to capture the moment she comes out of the courthouse.
10) 3rd party witness testimonies that completely destroy many of her claims.
11) No one, except her sister Whitney, has seen JD be violent with AH or any other person in his 58 years of life. The incident where Whitney claims JD was violent she cannot even provide a story that aligns with her sister's story of the same event. Whitney's friend Jennifer Howell, that she had to move into after this event, has a completely different story.
12) testimony from 3 police officers that went to their apartment on a night she claims violently attacked her and ripped hair out of her scalp and destroyed their apartment. None of the officers that came saw any injuries to her face or damage to property.
13) In none of the recordings, most of which she recorded in secret, does JD assault her or admit to assaulting her. As stated, it is she that admits assaults and sounds like an insane abuser, certainly not a victim
14) Taking a dump in their bed. Sounds like a victim deathly afraid of their abuser, right?
15) Testifying that she was scared of her life. Then shortly after "I am not a victim, I have never looked at myself as a victim" - she wrote an op-ed where she claims she was a victim and that's why they are there in the first place.
16) Not long after testifying she was afraid for her life. She was asked about taking pictures of JD sleeping in unflattering positions and if she wasn't afraid of taking pictures of her monster abuser and mocking him in text messages to her friends. She replied coldly "no, why would I be scared?"
17) Her demeanor in court. Staring down JD, smirking laughing when he was testifying about incidents. Visibly laughing the other day when he talked about the time she severed his finger. She doesn't ever come across as a victim of anything, except her own lies, narcissism and personality disorders.
18) Claimed she had donated all 7 million of her settlement to charity, She perjured herself both in this trial and the UK trial regarding this. Went on talk shows and talked in articels how she had donated all the money she received and that "she wanted nothing". She has only donated a fraction, and that money came from Elon Musk. She has kept pretty much all of her settlement money. Her excuse was that JD sued her, but he didn't sue her until over a year after her last settlement payment was made and she had received millions up until then.
19) Had Elon Musk donate 250k to one of JD's witnesses' charity as hush money.

The worst thing AH's team has are text messages from JD to either family or friends where he is venting and writing some dark stuff but understandable if your life is being ruined.

There is more, but I cannot be bothered to type anymore.

 

[DJ12]

The reason I ask is because while I've heard several people say the same thing as you, I've also heard a few say they believed Heard. Megyn Kelly, former attorney and who has always been very anti women claiming victim to capitalize on MeToo, is someone who said she believed every word Amber Heard said and thought from knowing abused women in the past and interviewing many, she was absolutely an abused woman. Granted, she thought Depp was abused as well.

Not saying she is the be all, end all, I've heard a few believe Heard was legitimately abused by Depp. And I'm not even saying they're right. I'm saying I've heard the opinions of people who have watched the trial and totally believed Heard. So it is a matter of an opinion to a degree, no?

The problem with believe Amber Turd is which version of events are you going to believe. The one she started with or the several editions later where she changed facts or added new ones?

And that's without going into any of her 'Evidence' - bitch used the same picture for two alleged separate instances months apart ffs.

Both entered into evidence. Stains and even the wine bottle on the floor in the exact same place.

There's a reason Amber gave her team a lot of photos that even they didn't put into evidence, some that she claims show events she made up, sorry recounted under oath.

If your own lawyers aren't using the evidence you fabricated that's says a lot.

Not to mention in closing they basically admitted the physical abuse was a lie when they argued even verbal abuse from Depp counts. The only thing they could actually prove happened. Although it was in private messages that wouldn't have come to light if it wasn't for the trial anyway.

 

[DragoonKain]

Based on what? It is certainly not the evidence or the witnesses because that all point to her being the abuser. So it's only based on her "experience" with abuse victims and that interview? This chick is such a terrible actress that when she was describing her "abuse" on the stand she was fake crying without tears and this is the person she believed? She's either retarded or she has an angle.

Yes, this was a few weeks ago. The testimony where she was crying on the stand. Megyn said she believed her testimony and she comes off as a genuinely abused person who has suffered years of domestic abuse. Also thought the shitting in the bed thing was being drastically overblown. That's her opinion, I didn't put more stock into it than anyone else's. Just noted it.

 

[PaddyOCanager]

Is there a reason people don't believe Heard's claims of abuse? Was it simply because they weren't backed up by substantial evidence or was it a "she didn't sound believable on the stand" thing... or a combination of both?

I know at a minimum she claimed she was forcefully vaginally searched by Depp for drugs and also he threw was it really expensive champagne bottles at her that he ordered? I forget the specifics, I've seen a bunch of clips here and there on the news and on random shows I watch and listen to. I listened to Rogan the other day and he basically said "She's full of shit, I can just tell" and he may be right, but have these been factually disputed at all.

Have you even listened to the recorded conversations between Amber and Johnny?


That's one of MANY. We watched 6 weeks of stuff like this. He literally is trying to get away from his abuser.

 

[demigod]

Innocent until proven guilty at trial. I'm talking purely about the court of public opinion, where those same standards don't apply. Viewers can feel however they want about and trial, that's their prerogative.

Is there a reason people don't believe Heard's claims of abuse? Was it simply because they weren't backed up by substantial evidence or was it a "she didn't sound believable on the stand" thing... or a combination of both?

I know at a minimum she claimed she was forcefully vaginally searched by Depp for drugs and also he threw was it really expensive champagne bottles at her that he ordered? I forget the specifics, I've seen a bunch of clips here and there on the news and on random shows I watch and listen to. I listened to Rogan the other day and he basically said "She's full of shit, I can just tell" and he may be right, but have these been factually disputed at all.

You sound like you haven’t gotten laid in years.

Amber Turd and her fake cries are laughable. That’s not a real cry.

 

[Konnor]

Yes, this was a few weeks ago. The testimony where she was crying on the stand. Megyn said she believed her testimony and she comes off as a genuinely abused person who has suffered years of domestic abuse. Also thought the shitting in the bed thing was being drastically overblown. That's her opinion, I didn't put more stock into it than anyone else's. Just noted it.

I cannot stress this enough, Amber Heard is a terrible actress, absolutely, hilariously, terrible, TERRIBLE actress. Megyn Kelly is a fucking moron just for the fact that she believed her based on that cringy testimony.

 

[Sony]

I still haven’t seen a second of this trial. But I find it weird that seemingly a lot of people have gone into it with a rooting interest. I’ve listened to a couple podcasts and touched on it a little bit, it seems like it was a really dysfunctional relationship on both sides and there’s not really an argument that both sides committed abuse to the other, although Depp supporters will argue she was worse than him.

I feel like for some people this trial represents a course correction on the MeToo era that people have always hated and Depp winning this trial would be a big FU to all the “believe all women” crowd. Or am I reading the room incorrectly?

People who haven't seen the trial really shouldn't comment because if you'd seen it, you'd realize that there is no both sides to this. There is only one party who has tangible evidence of lies against her and tangible evidence of commuting physical abuse, and that is Heard.

there is no both sides in this came. Period. Added to that, Heard commited perjury multiple times.

 

[Patrick S.]

Yeah the turd was fake crying again shortly before the end, and a few minutes later she was all giggles and smiles. Disgusting snake

 

[Hugare]

Rule #1 of dealing with crazy chicks nowadays is to record everything you can. Mine didn't accuse me of anything in the end but I had a lot of recorded calls and a few recorded fights that I would dump on social media the moment she accused me.

Btw this might sound excessive to some or you might think "this won't happen to me" but it's not a coincidence that in every fucking forum and community I've been there are stories like this from men that had their lives ruined by crazy chicks.

I was 20 when it happened, my first gf, I was too shy, too naive ...

And she gaslighted me by saying "this is your first relationship, so you dont have experience, but all relationships are like this"

Wouldnt happen now since I'm way more mature and experienced

And it's harder for men to admit suffering from abuse due to sexism. Tell your friends, or even cops, that you are being abused from your significant other and they'll say "lol, man up, dude"

About your last sentence: people can be monsters, no matter the gender. So it rustle my jimmies that MeToo is so focused on women.

Because it makes it harder for guys who are already suffering from some form of abuse

 

[Mr Moose]

Yes, this was a few weeks ago. The testimony where she was crying on the stand. Megyn said she believed her testimony and she comes off as a genuinely abused person who has suffered years of domestic abuse. Also thought the shitting in the bed thing was being drastically overblown. That's her opinion, I didn't put more stock into it than anyone else's. Just noted it.

She can't cry though, she's not a good actress.
Dr Curry said exactly how she would react and nailed it.