Julian Assange to issue statement 'in front' of Ecuador embassy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Im not sure ordering the US to do anything is going to help
 
I think everything is biased against Assange. He might be a jerk or a piece of shit but the simple fact is that all these things popped up right around the time he humiliated many governments including America. And they were PISSED. They want his blood and will boss and bully countries to get him to them. Look at that AWFUL New York Times piece where they criticize him for not flushing a toilet. It sounds like someone out of the Onion. Not to mention several media places wanting him killed. And if you think the American government wouldn't be as hateful as that then look at Bradly Manning. Tortured, locked away, god knows what has been done to him.

Maybe he did rape, maybe he didn't but to raid an embassy over it? To break international law? To work so hard and tirelessly to bring him in, not to send him to jail, not to send him to court over charges, but to QUESTION him? It's a fucking joke. He isn't running from being questioned, he's running from being sent to America and god know what they'll do to him.

Yes, they popped up around the time he humiliated governments because it was at that time he was using his celebrity status to sleep with Swedish women. It was also the time the other Wikileaks staff got fed up with him being a pompous arrogant douchebag. Coincidence? Had he an ounce of humility he wouldn't be in this situation.

He is not running from being sent to the US. The US and UK have an extradition treaty. There is nothing stopping the US extraditing him from the UK where he has been living in his country house all this time.
 
So is Manning not being treated as a US citizen? How can they keep him without trial?
 
Do you think this kind of trolling is fun or are you just bored.

I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.

Yes, they're rape apologists.
 
I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.

Yes, they're rape apologists.
Alleged rape apologists.
 
Well, that speech was seeping with irony, particularly in the bits where talking about persecuting journalists/defending free speech and then praising that list of countries...
 
I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.

Yes, they're rape apologists.

You kidnap children and slit their throats.

Anyone who says otherwise and defends you is a child killing apologist, let it be known.
 
Assange was in Sweden for a while. He praised the laws in Sweden and the freedom of speech and the press there. He even applied to become a Swedish citizen.

Now he says that going to Sweden suddenly equals getting sent to USA and a possible death sentence?

If the US really wanted him they would have requested to have him extradited from the UK, wouldn't they?

If Assange had gone to Sweden at once all this (including any possible jailtime) would have been over a long time ago.
 
No that doesn't matter actually because guilt, evidence or a trial isn't necessary, if I say you're something then that's what you are because I said so.

You're missing the point, which isn't that he should be considered a rapist before convicted, it is that the two things aren't comparable. If no evidence existed, things wouldn't have gone this far. Unlike the case against Assange, your accusations would never be taken seriously because you lack any evidence whatsoever.
 
You're missing the point, which isn't that he should be considered a rapist before convicted, it is that the two things aren't comparable. If no evidence existed, things wouldn't have gone this far.

Some Iraqis might disagree.

Unlike the case against Assange, your accusations would never be taken seriously because you lack any evidence whatsoever.

Maybe it also has something to do with the fact that the accusee hasn't royally pissed off multiple governments.
 
I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.

Yes, they're rape apologists.

Im not sure why people keep saying this. If you behave this way, there is no way to have a discussion with you.

Its either he is guilty of the charges or the USA truly wants him (dead or his life). But since its not your skin, you are being obtuse about this whole thing. His life is at stake here. Im sure if he were truly guilty of rape, he wouldn't have a problem doing time. But if he knows he aint guilty and feels that the USA wants to torturer him for the rest of his life, he wont give up easily and must try to avoid being played by the US government.
 
Some Iraqis might disagree.



Maybe it also has something to do with the fact that the accusee hasn't royally pissed off multiple governments.

Do you really mean this or is this an elaborate prank.

Not even going to bother, shit on Assange all you want I don't have the patience.

Two women with which he has been known to associate with claim to have been raped. Is law enforcement supposed to ignore this just because the US doesn't like him?
 
So many douchebags wearing those guy fawkes masks.
Irrespective of people latching onto Anonymous, and tacking it onto stupid things. This is not one of them. Anonymous activists do a lot of work for unsung causes including freedom of speech that stretches far beyond something as trivial as SOPA or ACTA
 
Two women with which he has been known to associate with claim to have been raped. Is law enforcement supposed to ignore this just because the US doesn't like him?

Nope but it doesn't rule out the possibility that they haven't been given an incentive to make such claims; the surrounding circumstances are far from cut-and-dry. I personally think he should return to Sweden and get this sorted either way (and the UK government is right not to let it slide) but still, it wouldn't surprise me if this was a stitch-up. Look what happened to Al-Mehgrahi.

Irrespective of people latching onto Anonymous, and tacking it onto stupid things. This is not one of them. Anonymous activists do a lot of work for unsung causes including freedom of speech that stretches far beyond something as trivial as SOPA or ACTA

Yeah but you can guarantee that the vast majority of people wearing those masks are not "Anonymous activists" but douchey scenesters trying to look cool.
 
Nope but it doesn't rule out the possibility that they haven't been given an incentive to make such claims; the surrounding circumstances are far from cut-and-dry. I personally think he should return to Sweden and get this sorted either way (and the UK government is right not to let it slide) but still, it wouldn't surprise me if this was a stitch-up. Look what happened to Al-Mehgrahi.

Too bad he doesn't want to then. That's the sort of thing that should be handled in court, but suggesting that what is happening is due to pressure from the US before it has been sorted out in court is unfair to the women involved. Just like Assange isn't guilty until proven, so should you not suggest that this is all due to US involvement either, as the women deserve the benefit of doubt too.

I'm not a rape apologist. He isn't even charged with anything yet and there are other factors involved here.

He will be, questioning is just a legally necessary step before charging him.
 
Too bad he doesn't want to then. That's the sort of thing that should be handled in court, but suggesting that what is happening is due to pressure from the US before it has been sorted out in court is unfair to the women involved. Just like Assange isn't guilty until proven, so should you not suggest that this is all due to US involvement either, as the women deserve the benefit of doubt too.

No, I live in the real world and don't discount either possibility, unlike you. Your stance is basically "the government would NEVER frame a person", it's naive to the point of absurdity.
 
No, I live in the real world and don't discount either possibility, unlike you. Your stance is basically "the government would NEVER frame a person", it's naive to the point of absurdity.

No, it's "until there's reason to believe it is happening, there's no reason to believe it's happening". A baseless conspiracy theory is what it is until then. Just because a government doesn't like an individual doesn't mean that everything undesirable that happens to the individual is that government's fault; you need to prove a link between them, and there is no evidence for that.
 
An extradition is by definition an international "manhunt". My point is, that if you take away all this extra media hubbub, it's basically just a standard extradition procedure like any other. There's been plenty of those for a variety of crimes, including rape. The extra publicity and Assange's curious act of fleeing into an embassy are making this appear a lot more spectacular than it really is.
Indeed, he probably isn't the first guy to try this either. He might be the first guy that just doesn't get kicked out of the embassy.

However, this simply isn't done normally. Not every rapist gets an INTERNATIONAL MANHUNT on him. In fact, has any other?
Every rapist that has crossed the border. For instance Roman Polanski who gets mentionned quite frequently in this topic.

He is not running from being sent to the US. The US and UK have an extradition treaty. There is nothing stopping the US extraditing him from the UK where he has been living in his country house all this time.
UK courts are quite troublesome and have proven so already. They have stopped the extradition for a child rapist because he could get life in the US...
 
Bradley Manning is a traitor to his country, he knew what he was doing when he did it.

Assange? Guy is an egomaniac, and I wish he'd go face his charges head on.. running from them doesn't make me think better of him.

The "Collateral Murder" video showed Assange's true colors.. it's not about open access to info. He's just another political figure forcing his message with an agenda. Wikileaks lost credibility to me at that point.
 
No, it's "until there's reason to believe it is happening, there's no reason to believe it's happening". A baseless conspiracy theory is what it is until then.

Do you seriously need reminding of the thousands upon thousands of incidents where governments all over the world have been proven to have committed all kinds of awful acts, but only years later after administrations change and documents become unclassified? The idea that we shouldn't even suspect government wrong-doing until solid evidence materializes is ridiculous.
 
Bradley Manning is a traitor to his country, he knew what he was doing when he did it.

When a country does terrible things, even your own, they should be exposed. Even if what he did was completely wrong America torturing and locking him away like they have is disgraceful.

He will be, questioning is just a legally necessary step before charging him.

The whole things sounds suspicious. I don't blame him for not wanting to go there. I'm not supporting him for rape, I'm supporting him by not wanting America to fuck him up because he exposed them and other countries for doing bad things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom