Yep also whoever put up the bail money are shit out of luckare there an charges the Uk can put against assange if they arrest him? Has he broken bail terms?
I'm sure they knew of his plans, seems logical.Yep also whoever put up the bail money are shit out of luck
I'm sure they knew of his plans, seems logical.
Yeah good point, he has tons of rich people who like that he does the whole free information thing.I'm sure they knew of his plans, seems logical.
Can't hear anything because of the ambient noise.
Abc4 coverage is fantastic here in Australia, was a bit surprised. Connection only dropped sound a few times before the appearance started.Can't hear anything.
I never knew that GAF had so many rape apologists.
I think everything is biased against Assange. He might be a jerk or a piece of shit but the simple fact is that all these things popped up right around the time he humiliated many governments including America. And they were PISSED. They want his blood and will boss and bully countries to get him to them. Look at that AWFUL New York Times piece where they criticize him for not flushing a toilet. It sounds like someone out of the Onion. Not to mention several media places wanting him killed. And if you think the American government wouldn't be as hateful as that then look at Bradly Manning. Tortured, locked away, god knows what has been done to him.
Maybe he did rape, maybe he didn't but to raid an embassy over it? To break international law? To work so hard and tirelessly to bring him in, not to send him to jail, not to send him to court over charges, but to QUESTION him? It's a fucking joke. He isn't running from being questioned, he's running from being sent to America and god know what they'll do to him.
'Bradley Manning must be released'
Here we go.
Pretty sure he has talked about them once or twice in the past....Nothing about the alleged rape charges?
Hmm...
So is Manning not being treated as a US citizen? How can they keep him without trial?
Pretty sure he has talked about them once or twice in the past....
So is Manning not being treated as a US citizen? How can they keep him without trial?
Do you think this kind of trolling is fun or are you just bored.
So is Manning not being treated as a US citizen? How can they keep him without trial?
Alleged rape apologists.I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.
Yes, they're rape apologists.
I bet someone set up a market stall around the corner to make a killing on them.So many douchebags wearing those guy fawkes masks.
I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.
Yes, they're rape apologists.
You kidnap children and slit their throats.
Anyone who says otherwise and defends you is a child killing apologist, let it be known.
Could you get law enforcement to take you seriously first, please?
He was originally in Sweden for the investigation until they said they were done with him so he went to the UK for some talks.If Assange had gone to Sweden at once all this (including any possible jailtime) would have been over a long time ago.
So many douchebags wearing those guy fawkes masks.
No that doesn't matter actually because guilt, evidence or a trial isn't necessary, if I say you're something then that's what you are because I said so.
You're missing the point, which isn't that he should be considered a rapist before convicted, it is that the two things aren't comparable. If no evidence existed, things wouldn't have gone this far.
Unlike the case against Assange, your accusations would never be taken seriously because you lack any evidence whatsoever.
If no evidence existed, things wouldn't have gone this far.
I don't know how else to characterise people who defend an international fugitive who has been charged with rape, and support his attempts to circumvent the justice system in two free democratic states with independent robust legal systems, simply because they agree with his political views.
Yes, they're rape apologists.
Some Iraqis might disagree.
Maybe it also has something to do with the fact that the accusee hasn't royally pissed off multiple governments.
Do you really mean this or is this an elaborate prank.
Not even going to bother, shit on Assange all you want I don't have the patience.
Irrespective of people latching onto Anonymous, and tacking it onto stupid things. This is not one of them. Anonymous activists do a lot of work for unsung causes including freedom of speech that stretches far beyond something as trivial as SOPA or ACTASo many douchebags wearing those guy fawkes masks.
why does the US still have the death penalty in certain states, thats a question worth answering in this debate
Two women with which he has been known to associate with claim to have been raped. Is law enforcement supposed to ignore this just because the US doesn't like him?
Irrespective of people latching onto Anonymous, and tacking it onto stupid things. This is not one of them. Anonymous activists do a lot of work for unsung causes including freedom of speech that stretches far beyond something as trivial as SOPA or ACTA
I never knew that GAF had so many rape apologists.
Aledged rape apologists you mean.
Nope but it doesn't rule out the possibility that they haven't been given an incentive to make such claims; the surrounding circumstances are far from cut-and-dry. I personally think he should return to Sweden and get this sorted either way (and the UK government is right not to let it slide) but still, it wouldn't surprise me if this was a stitch-up. Look what happened to Al-Mehgrahi.
I'm not a rape apologist. He isn't even charged with anything yet and there are other factors involved here.
Too bad he doesn't want to then. That's the sort of thing that should be handled in court, but suggesting that what is happening is due to pressure from the US before it has been sorted out in court is unfair to the women involved. Just like Assange isn't guilty until proven, so should you not suggest that this is all due to US involvement either, as the women deserve the benefit of doubt too.
No, I live in the real world and don't discount either possibility, unlike you. Your stance is basically "the government would NEVER frame a person", it's naive to the point of absurdity.
Indeed, he probably isn't the first guy to try this either. He might be the first guy that just doesn't get kicked out of the embassy.An extradition is by definition an international "manhunt". My point is, that if you take away all this extra media hubbub, it's basically just a standard extradition procedure like any other. There's been plenty of those for a variety of crimes, including rape. The extra publicity and Assange's curious act of fleeing into an embassy are making this appear a lot more spectacular than it really is.
Every rapist that has crossed the border. For instance Roman Polanski who gets mentionned quite frequently in this topic.However, this simply isn't done normally. Not every rapist gets an INTERNATIONAL MANHUNT on him. In fact, has any other?
UK courts are quite troublesome and have proven so already. They have stopped the extradition for a child rapist because he could get life in the US...He is not running from being sent to the US. The US and UK have an extradition treaty. There is nothing stopping the US extraditing him from the UK where he has been living in his country house all this time.
No, it's "until there's reason to believe it is happening, there's no reason to believe it's happening". A baseless conspiracy theory is what it is until then.
Bradley Manning is a traitor to his country, he knew what he was doing when he did it.
He will be, questioning is just a legally necessary step before charging him.