Sorry but this is only anti-feminist if we are supposed to believe Parker was justified in his beliefs or something. And beer has nothing to do with feminism here.
I was simply rebutting the idea that Whedon doesn't punish characters for sex, which he clearly does. Again, Buffy's sexual history is:
- Loses her virginity to her 200-year-old vampire boyfriend on her 17th birthday. This act turns him into a murderous monster.
- Has sex with a seemingly sweet guy that was only using her. She becomes depressed and drinks, which causes her to devolve into a Neandrathal.
- Starts a consensual relationship with the TA in her Psych class. Over the course of the relationship, they are influenced by poltergeists to have nonstop sex, manipulated into having a nonconsensual encounter when Buffy's body is stolen, and secretly videotaped during sex.
- Has a toxic sexual relationship with a murderous vampire. When she tries to break off the relationship, he attempts to rape her.
And again, that's only Buffy Summers. Cordelia probably had it worse on Angel, considering that she was used as an alien broodmare after a one-night-stand and was possessed by a demon that used her body to bang a teenager and get pregnant.
I have no interest in declaring Joss Whedon's oeuvre as feminist or anti-feminist. I'm a huge fan of Buffy and love many of the characters he has created. I also have an abundance of issues with his shows, from his treatment of sex to the Buffybot to the mess that is Xander Harris.
For years, both Whedon's feminism has been used as a shield against criticism of his work. (It was apparently also used as a shield for his affairs) But truthfully, Whedon's feminism -- or lack thereof -- shouldn't matter at all here. Feminism isn't an excuse that you can use to get away with questionable writing, and men that treat women poorly are still capable of writing compelling female characters.