LordKasual
Banned
That's a whole lotta text you went out of your way to write just to defend someone who is a complete asshole. If Albert Einstein was a POS to his wife and was called out for it by the public, you'd defend him just because he was Albert Einstein, huh? Brave.
....yes, I would? His contribution to humanity will be with us until the day the human race goes extinct. I'm not defending his actions, i'm questioning why people think it's important to ridicule someone and their work for the actions of their private life, when it has nothing to do with their work.
I don't see what bravery has to do with this, i'm in no danger by caring or not caring, it's none of my business.
I've never been entirely on board with Whedon's brand of feminism, which always struck me as slightly dated, or maybe fetishistic. He writes a lot of "kick-ass" women, but a pretty high proportion of them are 90 pound models. A character like Game of Thrones' Brienne feels somehow more real and modern, and less exploitative, although I'd hardly hold up GoT as a perfect icon of feminism in general.
That said, I'm not sure I like the straight line being drawn between infidelity and feminist hypocrisy. If a woman cheats on her loving and faithful husband, she is not a misandrist. She is just a human being with flaws. The reverse is true as well.
Now, if and when the details come out, perhaps they will show that Whedon played upon his fame and power to coerce people into sex (this seems highly probable, to be honest). That would be hypocritical in the extreme. But if the facts are simply that he had consensual relationships with coworkers who were actually into him, it strikes me as mostly orthogonal to feminism. Bad person, though, and worthy of blame? Absolutely.
Gwendoline Christie is 6'3". She's a more realistic "kick-ass" woman on a pound for pound basis, but the vast majority of women are not 6'3" tall.
And I don't see how cheating is this "anti-feminist" thing when women are easily just as capable of cheating as men are. A man who cheats doesn't mean he disrespects women, or doesn't care about the things that self-proclaimed feminists stand for.
And even if some news came out that he was decidedly "not feminist", then I really wonder where that leaves his previous body of work that many women agree is a great example of female empowerment. Do we just take it back, and accept a net loss?
Furthermore, in what magical timeline of earth are people expecting to find some kind of hero that stands for their ideals but has NO history of slipups and no standing personality flaws?