I'd meant to post about this video the other day. Genuinely sad to see people talk about Scorsese films, particularly one like Wolf Of Wall Street, as "eat your vegetables" type films. It seems like the range of films that a lot of people are willing to watch is getting narrower and narrower.
He does it to himself, most people aren't interested to watch a 3,5 hour movie. Instead of blaming everybody else, its basially scorsese that's the issue here. the golden rule has always been 90-120 minutes movies is the sweet spot, go far over it and people will naturally ignore it more and more.
Scorsese on the movie lenght question:
What I’m starting to notice is our underestimation of modern-dat audience attention spans. As Scorsese recently noted in an interview, if you can watch 5 hours of a TV show then ‘Killers’ shouldn’t be seen as an endurance test.
That series i can bing watch at home, I get every 30 minutes a time warp back into the last episode on what happened to fill me in if i didn't pay enough attention, wife can watch a episode or two with you or whenever she pops in she's filled in easy etc etc. On top of that most of those series aren't connected towards eachother but self contained smaller story's.
Result is i can pauze, watch it whenever, rewind it and stop watching without missing much. And all that while i do work on the side, so its more a backdrop.
With a movie at a cinema that aint working, its a complete different market something he doesn't seem to understand.
Then about attention span, everybody's attentionspan is going down from young to old because a movie simple isn't what it was 20 years ago. We all have far more things in our life going on, and we need to be up do date about everything. So kids in general have a less attentionspan, while older people which probably have a bigger attentionspan, but have probably more things to do.
For example, if u are single and go to the cinema at 20, and u want to watch a 3,5 hour movie, I can probably do that far easier then if u are 35 years old, u have a kid, a wife and need to do 10 things at home. So the limited time u do have, u probably don't wan to drag another person ( wife with you ) that is maybe not interested in watching longer movies or movies at all. Which lowers the factor again.
And this is also why super hero movies that are longer then 2 hours are still visited or other movies that already proved themselves. Those movies are far more interested towards a younger audience, then a mid aged woman drama about some oil from hundreds of years ago only a select few care for most likely. And the older audience, well as i said aren't going to watch it either.
What he should have done, is make a 2 part movie. 90-120 minutes each. But i doubt even he even had faith in people paying twice for a movie like this. then the next best option, just make it a 90 to 120 minutes movie and cut stuff.
So about that video of that guy talking the way he talks, well that's just the reality of what most people think really. He watched 1 hour of said movie and kinda was done with it. And that's another problem, a 1 hour and 30 minutes movie u can still struggle through if its not that good, a 3,5 hour movie aint happening.
Hell i just watched big fat greek wedding 3 on the background, its a decent movie nothing special, but after 90 minutes i wanted it to end and it ended there, if the movie was 3,5 hours i would have not even started watching it, way to long. but if i did do it, it would be a really bad experience at the end.
This movie is made for the pure scorsese die hard fans, and nobody else.