• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

LaGuardia Airport NYC to be completely rebuilt in $4 billion renovation

Status
Not open for further replies.

friday

Member
That airport is terrible. Getting there is a pain unless you get an (expensive) car ride. The place is tiny for the amount of people that move through it, and the wait time between leaving the gate and actually taking off can be anywhere from 30 minutes to and hour.

The subway needs help too, but I think Laguardia needs it more.
 

Rukes

The front page still gets no respect
LAX is probably the worst I've ever been to. I was blown away the first time I was there that such a prolific airport could be such a shithole.

The traffic is always bad, granted, but most of the terminals are going through huge renovations, although the problem is still of course working within the limited terminal footprints. The International terminal is insanely amazing, and it's still not finished.
 

cajunator

Banned
I've gone through LaGuardia a handful of times, and it's not even in my Bottom 3 for airports (that'd probably go to Logan in Boston, CVG in Cincinnati, & MIA in Miami), but it could certainly use the update. It's a bit stuck in the past, mostly in that the airport can't adequately move and support the amount of people who fly through there and the facilities are just kind of old and busted.

I remember walking into a bathroom at LGA once and there were a few tiles missing. In the space of one of the tiles, there was square foot-sized hole. There happened to be an airport employee in there, and when I asked him what happened, he just shrugged and said, "I'unno," and then proceeded to DUCK TAPE A PLANK OVER THE HOLE. He even nodded and made a "problem solved" gesture afterwards haha.

And if they can get subway stops built into it, that'd be fucking awesome. It's one of the things I love about living in Chicago. Whether I'm going to O'Hare or Midway, I can take the train all the way there without having to transfer to a bus.

I really loved the design or Raegan international. Maybe they can make Laguardia look like that!
 

NimbusD

Member
So one of the arguments about how Cuomo is a toxic bumbling idiot is that he's ready to dump $4bn into one of three airports, while the subway system, which carries millions more people, collapses on itself.

Oh, by the way, did anyone notice that the $4bn cost is BEFORE the planned airtrain and ferry?

He talks about 3rd world infrastructure...behold, the global epicenter of money

0oFzs6q.jpg


1xMXFpb.jpg


IrsHnDI.jpg


STdBJdV.jpg


This is what happens you you elect someone who travels exclusively by limo and business class airplane

And this dude has been continually holding back funding for the MTA, basically telling DeBlasio to fuck off in more or less words and that the City can deal with it, when in fact any funding for the MTA has to go through Albany so DeBlasio really can't do shit. It's insane.
 

Pau

Member
I actually like LaGuarida? Maybe because it's small and I never have to wait long in line for anything. But the only other airports I go to regularly are MIA and ones in third world countries so maybe that's it. :(

Having something other than one bus go there would be nice, but I live close enough that a taxi there is fairly cheap.
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
Anyone have some decent pictures? The OP ones are awful. Can't even tell what the layout will look like.
 

fancimus

Member
For the billions they're going to spend, I wish they were actually going to fix the primary reason why LGA is so bad...the runways.

LGA only has two runways. They are short runways, require more advanced flight paths than most airports, and they intersect each other. That means only one plane at a time can alternate between landing and taking off.

No matter how nice the new terminal is, or how much extra space they give planes to taxi, it doesn't solve the fundamental issue...which is really a shame.

The problem, of course, is space. LGA borders the bay, so where else could it build? I read a proposal once to demolish the prison on Rikers Island, and rebuild LGA there. Seems like the only thing that would be remotely possible.

Regardless, NYC needs a mega airport, larger than JFK or LGA, that's positioned well-outside of the city, like NRT or DIA. Maybe one of the airports out in Long Island could be demolished and re-built, with a dedicated train line into the city. I've never been out there, so I have no idea how feasible that would be, or if they have any additional space to play with.
 
For the billions they're going to spend, I wish they were actually going to fix the primary reason why LGA is so bad...the runways.

LGA only has two runways. They are short runways, require more advanced flight paths than most airports, and they intersect each other. That means only one plane at a time can alternate between landing and taking off.

No matter how nice the new terminal is, or how much extra space they give planes to taxi, it doesn't solve the fundamental issue...which is really a shame.

The problem, of course, is space. LGA borders the bay, so where else could it build? I read a proposal once to demolish the prison on Rikers Island, and rebuild LGA there. Seems like the only thing that would be remotely possible.

Regardless, NYC needs a mega airport, larger than JFK or LGA, that's positioned well-outside of the city, like NRT or DIA. Maybe one of the airports out in Long Island could be demolished and re-built, with a dedicated train line into the city. I've never been out there, so I have no idea how feasible that would be, or if they have any additional space to play with.

Threes an article about how for capacity reasons, the best option would be to simply close LaGuardia.

It would let more planes land at jfk and Newark.

But that's not convenient to the limo crowd
 

Zona

Member
For the billions they're going to spend, I wish they were actually going to fix the primary reason why LGA is so bad...the runways.

LGA only has two runways. They are short runways, require more advanced flight paths than most airports, and they intersect each other. That means only one plane at a time can alternate between landing and taking off.

No matter how nice the new terminal is, or how much extra space they give planes to taxi, it doesn't solve the fundamental issue...which is really a shame.

The problem, of course, is space. LGA borders the bay, so where else could it build? I read a proposal once to demolish the prison on Rikers Island, and rebuild LGA there. Seems like the only thing that would be remotely possible.

Regardless, NYC needs a mega airport, larger than JFK or LGA, that's positioned well-outside of the city, like NRT or DIA. Maybe one of the airports out in Long Island could be demolished and re-built, with a dedicated train line into the city. I've never been out there, so I have no idea how feasible that would be, or if they have any additional space to play with.

I have family who's an Air Traffic Controller at LGA. The only way they deal with the volume is to have anyone landing make a really quick stop so another plane can take off in front of them. The fact that two planes have yet to T-bone each other is a testament to the skills of the pilots and controllers.

I try and fly out of JFK myself.
 
Something something receipts.

I expect a ton of waste spent on this project. Finish the Williamsburg Bridge expansion first, then get back to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom