How can you disagree with this? They have the guns, they will win an altercation.
Resisting arrest is about the stupidest thing you can do. Being required to comply with police orders is the entire basis of policing. Are we supposed to be allowed to say "no thanks, I don't feel like being arrested today"?
So it's better to resist and likely get injured or killed than to comply and probably not get injured or killed?
He's being honest. Like it or not cops are people. When people get put in tense situations unpredictable things can happen no matter how much training they have. This is amplified by both sides of the confrontation having fears based on preconceptions and prejudices. So the question is do you want to test a persons resolve who has been given the use of deadly force by society? In theory you should, but it's not practical. As we have seen can result in someone getting killed.
As condescending and prick-ish as this guy is, it's good advice.
Jesus fuck. I hope none of you are anything but well-groomed white men with collared shirts when you're pulled over by a cop who just found out his wife is fucking a black neighbor.
You do not have to comply with police if they are acting illegally. You should not have to comply with police if they are acting illegally. Ever. Under any circumstances. Ever. You should not be told, BY POLICE, to "deal with it" in the event of an illegal interaction with law enforcement. You should not be conditioned to accept a society where law enforcement can abuse citizens as a matter of first recourse.
The entire article is washing away the fact that officers ROUTINELY interact with citizens in illegal, violent ways. Mostly minorities. To tell people that they should suck it up and be literally violated, just to write a letter to someone who won't give it a second look, is among the most ridiculous examples of people jerking off a broken and abusive authoritarian system I can imagine.
Think about the world you live in. Think about whether or not you want to have someone who can stop you, middle of the street, and literally demand that you acquiesce to their every whim simply because they have a gun. That is what this Op-Ed is supporting.
Then you're part of the problem. What a stupid attitude.Argue with them, cause them grief, or dumb enough to try and take one on? I got no pity for you.
No.
If you're not validly under arrest you should be able to resist. The onus is on the police to do their fucking job properly.
Jesus fuck. I hope none of you are anything but well-groomed white men with collared shirts when you're pulled over by a cop who just found out his wife is fucking a black neighbor.
You do not have to comply with police if they are acting illegally. You should not have to comply with police if they are acting illegally. Ever. Under any circumstances. Ever. You should not be told, BY POLICE, to "deal with it" in the event of an illegal interaction with law enforcement. You should not be conditioned to accept a society where law enforcement can abuse citizens as a matter of first recourse.
The entire article is washing away the fact that officers ROUTINELY interact with citizens in illegal, violent ways. Mostly minorities. To tell people that they should suck it up and be literally violated, just to write a letter to someone who won't give it a second look, is among the most ridiculous examples of people jerking off a broken and abusive authoritarian system I can imagine.
Think about the world you live in. Think about whether or not you want to have someone who can stop you, middle of the street, and literally demand that you acquiesce to their every whim simply because they have a gun. That is what this Op-Ed is supporting.
The problem lies with the fact that some cops don't need a reason to violate your rights; merely looking a certain way is grounds for them to act with violence. How do you protect yourself from that? Just look at all the recorded instances of policemen beating people under the pretense of "they were resisting" when they define "resisting" as drawing breath.The guy ain't wrong. Treat them with respect, calm the fuck down, and don't do anything dumb and you'll come out just fine.
Argue with them, cause them grief, or dumb enough to try and take one on? I got no pity for you.
Why did you quote me in this response? I agree that you shouldn't comply with illegal demands and made that clear in my post, unless you disagree with the whole "being polite" part.
How do you define police "acting illegally"? Is it what you believe is illegal or what is actually illegal? I'm not a lawyer so how do I know if I'm actually being arrested legally or not?
I don't know the law, but lets say that you're right and you don't have to comply.
Then what? They fucking shoot you.
If I comply, maybe I get charged with something, maybe I don't. If they did something illegal, maybe I sue them and get tons of money like that dude in NYC who got 125k after getting arrested for filming the cops.
I just don't see the benefit of not complying.
Of course that SHOULDN'T happen. But in your post you acknowledge it does.
So if an officer pulls you over for some bullshit, and he has just found out his wife is fucking a black guy, what are you gonna do? He's a psychopath with a gun. Of course it should not happen ever. But when it does holy shit why would you antagonize the guy who can legally kill you on a whim?
He doesn't condone what the officers are doing, and he even calls for them all to have cameras. To me he's just saying the obvious: if your rights are being violated, obviously it's a bad cop, and why would you give them a reason to shoot you?
(Just because people get killed by cops when they do comply, it doesn't make this any less of a harm minimization technique)
To everyone complaining about the article, what's your complaint? His advice seems like common sense for the vast majority of police interactions. Ultimately, he's not saying that action X, Y, or Z taken by the police is right or wrong; he's just stating what is and what is not the proper method of raising the impropriety of the police action.
That is beside the point. Everything leading up to "you are under arrest" is irrelevant.
At the point when a cop decides to arrest you, WHAT IS THE BENEFIT of resisting? You will not get away. You may end up dead. You will get additional charges (assault, resisting).
If your rights have been violated then your only recourse is legal action.
Please describe a scenario where a cop tries to arrest you illegally and you resist as you think you should. Play it out to its conclusion.
Also, if a cop does put you in a (illegal) choke hold, how is resisting going to make it better for you?
Well, I'd be surprised to find anyone who actually thought something positive would come from doing any of those things he mentioned, especially in a tense situation. Right or wrong, it should be common sense to not do anything from that list unless you want something negative to happen.
Speaking solely on the list, not on what else is going on in the world.
A little hyperbolic with a fairly out there straw man thrown in.
It's fucked up but it's practical advice given the kind of police culture that exists in the US.
Nothing is going change with this attitude. Yes, you were illegally stopped, searched, detained, and the officers took your money and do not intend to return it. You can write a strongly worded letter to their commanding officer. To city officials. To your state representative and senator. To the mayor. To your governor. To the Los Angeles Times. To Rachel Maddow..
Guess what? Thousands of other people are writing these letters. Daily. Millions are writing them monthly. Television segments are dedicated to them. Op-Ed sections. Speeches. 99% of the time, nothing is going to happen. 1% of the time you will get a significant payout. And 100% of the time you will be contributing to the continual pushback of civil rights by an aggressive, militarized, and largely corrupt American law enforcement community.
So yes, the benefit of complying is "only" the fact that without you and me and our fellow citizens planting our feet on the ground and refusing to allow the gross mistreatment of Americans by police, shit is just going to stay the same. And I don't want things the same.
It's victim blaming at its finest. He's not asking people to be polite because they may stumble with a bad cop, but literally telling the public that he, himself, the writer of that very article, may use lethal force against you for doing as much as mouthing off or walking towards him.
Then you're part of the problem. What a stupid attitude.
You're confusing what is happened in the past with advice for the future. He even says if you cross the line he should be rightfully arrested .
You're confusing what is happened in the past with advice for the future. He even says if you cross the line he should be rightfully arrested .
What would constitute "agressively walking" towards someone?
Besides walking while black, obviously.
There is no proper method because it is virtually impossible to get justice if a cop infringed on your rights.
As a minority whose gotten out of bad situations with police officers only because I didn't agitate them, I must say I don't know what you're talking about. The cop has a gun, I don't. The cop has a club, I don't. The cop (may) have a tazer, I don't. The cop has hand cuffs, I don't. While I don't have a bad temperament, can I be sure the cop doesn't? No. While the cop and I have equal authority to arrest each other if the other is breaking a law, whose has a system in place to help them enforce the law? The cop does, I don't.Jesus fuck. I hope none of you are anything but well-groomed white men with collared shirts when you're pulled over by a cop who just found out his wife is fucking a black neighbor.
You do not have to comply with police if they are acting illegally. You should not have to comply with police if they are acting illegally. Ever. Under any circumstances. Ever. You should not be told, BY POLICE, to "deal with it" in the event of an illegal interaction with law enforcement. You should not be conditioned to accept a society where law enforcement can abuse citizens as a matter of first recourse.
The entire article is washing away the fact that officers ROUTINELY interact with citizens in illegal, violent ways. Mostly minorities. To tell people that they should suck it up and be literally violated, just to write a letter to someone who won't give it a second look, is among the most ridiculous examples of people jerking off a broken and abusive authoritarian system I can imagine.
Think about the world you live in. Think about whether or not you want to have someone who can stop you, middle of the street, and literally demand that you acquiesce to their every whim simply because they have a gun. That is what this Op-Ed is supporting.
at least he's honest
Nguyen v Elliot (1995) VSC 754
Not America, but you didn't specify
Cops define resisting as struggling to breathe and / or shielding yourself from blows and punches.
You kind of got caught in the crossfire bruh. But to be honest with you, the idea that someone can or should be "polite" while refusing to obey illegal commands from an officer is fantasy world logic. No cop is going to allow someone to refuse politely, and very few people have the calm and patience to be abused directly by someone with a gun and authority without losing their shit.
Nothing is going change with this attitude. Yes, you were illegally stopped, searched, detained, and the officers took your money and do not intend to return it. You can write a strongly worded letter to their commanding officer. To city officials. To your state representative and senator. To the mayor. To your governor. To the Los Angeles Times. To Rachel Maddow..
Guess what? Thousands of other people are writing these letters. Daily. Millions are writing them monthly. Television segments are dedicated to them. Op-Ed sections. Speeches. 99% of the time, nothing is going to happen. 1% of the time you will get a significant payout. And 100% of the time you will be contributing to the continual pushback of civil rights by an aggressive, militarized, and largely corrupt American law enforcement community.
So yes, the benefit of complying is "only" the fact that without you and me and our fellow citizens planting our feet on the ground and refusing to allow the gross mistreatment of Americans by police, shit is just going to stay the same. And I don't want things the same.
^^^^^ see above
Actually he is. Which makes this even worse.I was about to say...
"Don't challenge us and we won't hurt you"
He's not lying. Not that that's a good thing.
Actually he is. Which makes this even worse.
Of course it's wrong.
If a mugger comes up to you with a knife and says "gimme your wallet or I'll cut you"
Do you have the right to resist? Yes
Would it be stupid to resist? Yes
Ideally there would be no muggers or power tripping cops, but that's not the world we live in.
But that line is blurry and not well defined at this point. We've had people beaten and killed for 'resisting arrest' when they weren't doing anything.
Lately it's "STOP RESISTING" being used to ultimately trample on people's rights and give cops a reason to beat the shit out of someone.
walking aggressively or insulting a police officer is grounds for arrest?
I agree with the article. Cops should be treated like large aggressive animals, as they are similarly unpredictable, dangerous, and quickly resort to violence. So avoid them if at all possible, but if an interaction is inevitable, do not provoke them.
First thing I thought of too.
You're confusing what has happened in the past with advice for the future. He even says if you cross the line he should be rightfully arrested .
Even though it might sound harsh and impolitic, here is the bottom line: if you dont want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you. Dont argue with me, dont call me names, dont tell me that I cant stop you, dont say Im a racist pig, dont threaten that youll sue me and take away my badge. Dont scream at me that you pay my salary, and dont even think of aggressively walking towards me. Most field stops are complete in minutes. How difficult is it to cooperate for that long?
Ok, and what changes with the "i dont need to comply" attitude? The cops get more aggressive and the us vs. them chasm widens.
The time of arrest is the absolute worst time to assert your rights. Public debate, better police training, legislation and enforcement are the only things that will change it. Violent interactions with the police are only going to make matters worse.
While it's been cops killing and shooting people all over the news recently don't forget that cops get shot all the time for no reason to. It's not a job I would want to have.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/suspect-held-minnesota-officer-killed-traffic-stop/story?id=24781737
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoI4G1fWmEQ
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lapd-shootout-pursuit-20140818-story.html
Notice in the first two the cops are shot by white guys. The 2nd link is really sad as the cop had time and every right to shot the guy and save his own life.
There are shitty people in all walks of life. People always talk about soldiers being heroes but the worst people I've known were ones I meet in the Army.
Is that they way things should work? No. But my comment wasn't based on the way things should be, it was based on the way things are in reality. If a cop is having a bad day, you don't want give them any excuse to take it out on you. If a cop feels that they're in danger, you have to do what you can to make sure they don't feel like you're a threat.
And, let's look at it from a different point of view: Cops enforce laws. That by its nature means that they have in interact often with the people that are bending or breaking those laws. If the cop is a good guy, shouldn't you, as a productive, caring member of society do what you can to make their job easier? After all, they're the ones making sure society's rules aren't broken.
You're going to have to summarize for me because I googled and it was all law gibberish to me.
That is complete nonsense and you know it. A bad cop may SAY that in defense of something they did illegally, but no court would convict someone of the crime of resisting arrest for "struggling to breathe"
Again he said he should be arrested if he did that.