bionic77 said:This thread reeks of lawyer racism.
We lawyers made this country and we can break it too!
Who is more hated in America, Lakers or Lawyers? You put yourself in this situation!
bionic77 said:This thread reeks of lawyer racism.
We lawyers made this country and we can break it too!
:lol :lol :lol :lolbionic77 said:Listen to yourself. You think that lawyers are so different from everyone else? We came to this country just like everyone else, looking for a dream.
You sir, and most of the people in this thread disgust me.
Tralfamadore64 said:0__o
Are lawyers a race?
DarienA said:Well I have heard them referred to as the lowest form of life known to man....
You guys are rabid anti-lawites! Oh it starts with a few jokes and some slurs and the next thing you know it, you are suggesting that lawyers have their own schools and have to sit at the back of the bus!worldrunover said:I think some kind of demi-human.
bionic77 said:Looks like the lawyers have to save the day again...
bionic77 said:You guys are rabid anti-lawites! Oh it starts with a few jokes and some slurs and the next thing you know it, you are suggesting that lawyers have their own schools and have to sit at the back of the bus!
bionic77 said:This thread reeks of lawyer racism.
We lawyers made this country and we can break it too!
ElectricBlue187 said:lawyers are truly the lowest form of humanity
just below hitler
MLK used to say "except lawyers" under his breath during his speaches. I DARE you to prove he didn't!bionic77 said:You guys are rabid anti-lawites! Oh it starts with a few jokes and some slurs and the next thing you know it, you are suggesting that lawyers have their own schools and have to sit at the back of the bus!
Rest in peace MLK. They obviously didn't learn their lesson. Looks like the lawyers have to save the day again...
bionic77 said:Listen to yourself. You think that lawyers are so different from everyone else? We came to this country just like everyone else, looking for a dream.
You sir, and most of the people in this thread disgust me.
Seriously WTF do these people expect us to do?commish said:You say that until you need us. Then you are like, "OMG SAVE ME."
bionic77 said:Seriously WTF do these people expect us to do?
I mean when a guy comes into my office and tells me that he is an emotional wreck because some massive foreign dry cleaning outfit has ruined his life (and pants), what do they expect us to do? His life is obviously over. We are just trying to get justice. And obviously in this case justice came out to be a little over 60 million dollars. That sounds like a lot of money, but when you think about it, can anyone really put a value on a pair of pants (especially the old rare kind)? This money will buy this man some piece of mind and send a message to dry cleaners everywhere that there are serious consequences to losing or destroying peoples' pants.
Yeah lets all make fun of the lawyers until they ruin your pants. Then suddenly we are your best friends!
I believecommish said:Exactly. Gaf makes me sick right now.
Seriously, I hope they take the lawyer to the cleaners.pel1300 said:If I were them I would seriously plan revenge at all costs.
glistenm said:I secretly hope that this guy is just pulling a giant "prank" on everybody to show the absurdity of shit that can get pushed through the legal system.
fallengorn said:I hope they take the lawyer to the cleaners.
More disheartening is that the guy is probably dead serious (in his mind) with the lawsuit.glistenm said:I secretly hope that this guy is just pulling a giant "prank" on everybody to show the absurdity of shit that can get pushed through the legal system.
fallengorn said:Seriously, I hope they take the lawyer to the cleaners.
Well duhJdFoX187 said:I believehe's being sarcastic.and hope
Pearson's first letter to the Chungs sought $1,150 so he could buy a new suit. Two lawyers and many legal bills later, the Chungs offered Pearson $3,000, then $4,600 and, finally, says their attorney, Chris Manning, $12,000 to settle the case.
Pearson relied on these signs. Deeply.
WASHINGTON - A judge had to leave the courtroom with tears running down his face Tuesday after recalling the lost pair of trousers that led to his $54 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner.
ADVERTISEMENT
Administrative law judge Roy L. Pearson had argued earlier in his opening statement that he is acting in the interest of all city residents against poor business practices. Defense attorneys called his claim "outlandish."
He originally sued Custom Cleaners for about $65 million under the District of Columbia consumer protection act and almost $2 million in common law claims. He is no longer seeking damages related to the pants, instead focusing his claims on two signs in the shop that have since been removed.
He alleges that Jin Chung, Soo Chung and Ki Chung, owners of the mom-and-pop business, committed fraud and misled consumers with signs that claimed "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service."
Pearson, representing himself, said in opening that he wanted to examine the culture that allowed "a group of defendants to engage in bad business practices for five years."
An attorney for the Chungs portrayed Pearson as a bitter man with financial troubles stemming from a recent divorce who is taking out his anger on a hardworking family.
"This case is very simple. It's about one sign and the plaintiff's outlandish interpretation," attorney Chris Manning said.
The Chungs were to present their case Wednesday. Manning asked D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff to award them reimbursement for their legal costs if they win.
Pearson called several witnesses Tuesday who testified that they stopped going to Custom Cleaners after problems with misplaced clothes.
Pearson also called himself as a witness, saying his problems began in May 2005 when he brought in several suits for alterations. A pair of pants from a blue and maroon suit was missing when he requested it two days later. He said Soo Chung tried to give him a pair of charcoal gray pants.
As Pearson explained that those weren't the pants for the suit, he choked up and left the courtroom crying after asking Bartnoff for a break.
Pearson originally asked the cleaners for the full price of the suit, which was more than $1,000. But because the Chungs insisted the pants had been found, they refused to pay.
Manning has said the cleaners made three settlement offers to Pearson, but the judge was not satisfied and increased his demands including asking for money to rent a car so he could drive to another business.
Ripclawe said:He choked up over a pair of pants and this is a judge.. eeek.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070612/ap_on_fe_st/odd_67_million_pants
A judge had to leave the courtroom with tears running down his face Tuesday after recalling the lost pair of trousers that led to his $54 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner
Steriletom said:The dude wears a blue and maroon suit. Clearly, he graduated from the Snoop Dogg judicial pimptastic institute.
being that he is in a public office, I suppose it is possible for him to be fired over this. from the way they stated his "judge-ship" though it doesn't sound like it's an elected position. that would be the easy way if it was.ItsInMyVeins said:Disgusting.
That guy has no place in a position of power.
Synthesizer Patel said:Pearson is pro-tort reform and anti-"frivolous" lawsuits. His goal is to ultimately prevent people from suing businesses for pretty much any reason. His record shows this.
He doesn't intend to win tihs case or think it's a good idea; in fact, just the opposite.
By acting like such a buffoon, he generates a lot of press and tricks people into thinking, "we need more laws to stop crazy people from filing frivolous lawsuits--like that lawyer who sued over the pair of pants!" Unfortunately this "reform" will come at the expense of legitimate lawsuits, too.
The best thing you can do is to stop giving him and his made-up dog-and-pony case attention.
Ripclawe said:He choked up over a pair of pants and this is a judge.. eeek.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070612/ap_on_fe_st/odd_67_million_pants
Manning has said the cleaners made three settlement offers to Pearson, but the judge was not satisfied and increased his demands including asking for money to rent a car so he could drive to another business.