Since I saw this on a fake news site at first, I thought it was a joke, but it turns out to be real (per the Washington Post):
I originally stumbled across this when someone linked to a story from nationalreport.net about facebook working with the DEA to go after drug dealers. My idea of 'satire' is The Onion or Clickhole, so I didn't immediately start reading this as satire, but my fake-meter went off as I read it, and googling the phone number at the bottom led me to the westboro baptist church. I then saw on my facebook feed that there were indeed [satire] tags next to related news stories, which led me to the WaPo article.
While nationalreport.net has some borderline satire ("Fundamentalist Chef Will Bake Koran on Live TV"), the WaPo article linked to other sites like http://witscience.org/, which is an example of pure clickbait, with no critical literary or humor value at all.
I'm torn in what I believe should be done, if anything at all. On the one hand, watching people believe satire is a pastime of mine, however purely fake news sites simply prey on the gullible and muddy up important conversations. I feel like The Onion, and other actual satirical sites, provide a service, as satire provides literary value, and those sites are going to get lost in the mix. Can witscience.org be considered 'satire'? And should facebook do anything at all in terms of editorializing content?
In a move that could permanently cripple the Internets unchecked hoax industry ( and ruin at least a couple of decent punch lines), Facebook this week announced that its experimenting with a tag that will mark sites such as the Onion, Clickhole and Empire News as satire and, hopefully, alert the millions of gullible people who share these sites as truth each week.
I originally stumbled across this when someone linked to a story from nationalreport.net about facebook working with the DEA to go after drug dealers. My idea of 'satire' is The Onion or Clickhole, so I didn't immediately start reading this as satire, but my fake-meter went off as I read it, and googling the phone number at the bottom led me to the westboro baptist church. I then saw on my facebook feed that there were indeed [satire] tags next to related news stories, which led me to the WaPo article.
While nationalreport.net has some borderline satire ("Fundamentalist Chef Will Bake Koran on Live TV"), the WaPo article linked to other sites like http://witscience.org/, which is an example of pure clickbait, with no critical literary or humor value at all.
I'm torn in what I believe should be done, if anything at all. On the one hand, watching people believe satire is a pastime of mine, however purely fake news sites simply prey on the gullible and muddy up important conversations. I feel like The Onion, and other actual satirical sites, provide a service, as satire provides literary value, and those sites are going to get lost in the mix. Can witscience.org be considered 'satire'? And should facebook do anything at all in terms of editorializing content?