RatskyWatsky
Hunky Nostradamus
Hahaha! I was actually working on it!![]()
I'm looking forward to it!
Hahaha! I was actually working on it!![]()
Wat?!Sagi, you need to make a new pie chart for this thread - Like you did for the last one![]()
I'm sorry sai-kun. my heart is with u
Parker Hurley has been one of my favorite people lately. I want a tattoo :|
Tattoo fetish...go.
Hot guys only?
Eh.
*walks out*
Not feeling the Wiki pic of him.
Hot guys only?
Eh.
*walks out*
Roger Huerta
Hot guys only?
Eh.
*walks out*
What's it with gay guys and tatoos? Finding one without one is like finding a unicorn, no pun intended.
Really? To each his own I guess. Try Dominic Nell (aka James Nichols of Englishlads).
I've never seen the acronym in this order before. I don't know what to do with myself.
I've never seen the acronym in this order before. I don't know what to do with myself.
Still better than when it's done "BLGT". Makes it sound like a sandwich.
I've never seen the acronym in this order before. I don't know what to do with myself.
What's it with gay guys and tatoos? Finding one without one is like finding a unicorn, no pun intended.
All right, guys. Some of the photos posted were too much. Please don't post guys who are basically naked (i.e. only wearing underwear). Also, I think the title is encouraging people to turn this into a hot guy picture dump thread, which is probably not a good idea, so I'd really prefer to change it into something else in order to avoid that. I'll let you guys give some ideas for that.
Please note that I'm not saying you can't post photos, I just don't want this thread to be a pic dump, and definitely not one that veers into NSFW territory.
Also, I think the title is encouraging people to turn this into a hot guy picture dump thread, which is probably not a good idea, so I'd really prefer to change it into something else in order to avoid that. I'll let you guys give some ideas for that.
The title is fine, IMO, just a clever pun.
Honestly, the thread balances out pretty well, and it'll go back to being just straight up discussion in a little while, I'm sure. This is just the first page, give us some time.
Plus the guys had pants... pants! And that's why I also didn't want to have a L. Women remove the fun from everything.
All right, guys. Some of the photos posted were too much. Please don't post guys who are basically naked (i.e. only wearing underwear). Also, I think the title is encouraging people to turn this into a hot guy picture dump thread, which is probably not a good idea, so I'd really prefer to change it into something else in order to avoid that. I'll let you guys give some ideas for that.
Please note that I'm not saying you can't post photos, I just don't want this thread to be a pic dump, and definitely not one that veers into NSFW territory.
The posts I got rid of most certainly did not contain men wearing pants.
My bisexuality has been "growing" lately. A few months ago I wouldn't give any of these pics a second glance but now I find them cute. So many tattoos though![]()
I like that title.Yeah, I can see that now that you mention it. Hmm...
Maybe, if we HAVE to change it, - Gay and Bisexual Thread |OT3| The Library Is Open (I would advocate for the inclusion of Lesbian in the title)? I like that a lot.
I don't get your pun, bi-kun. ._.The title is fine, IMO, just a clever pun.
I'm just curious where the line is drawn for male and females. Either way I can slow down on posting men.
I have a question then and Im not trying to question your choice. You say that having underware only is a no but what about the recent threads where women were wearing pretty much the same thing. There seems to never be a mod response to say this http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=513643&highlight=kate+upton
I'm just curious where the line is drawn for male and females. Either way I can slow down on posting men.
Kindly fig yourself in the eye, Moses! *beats with a stick*Plus the guys had pants... pants! And that's why I also didn't want to have a L. Women remove the fun from everything.
The thread is marked NSFW in the title, so that helps.
I don't get your pun, bi-kun. ._.
So if the thread title included NSFW it would be better?
I would remove the L and add NSFW then. Seriously, lesbians can have their own thread.
I would remove the L and add NSFW then. Seriously, lesbians can have their own thread.
Uh, what?
We kept the other threads, safe. I'm sure we can do it a third time around.
I would remove the L and add NSFW then. Seriously, lesbians can have their own thread.
I would remove the L and add NSFW then. Seriously, lesbians can have their own thread.
Yeah, it shouldn't be an issue. Eye candy posting is okay, but it's not like it's the purpose of the thread, and it's not like the last one was filled with NSFW stuff.
Cosigned. I think it should be changed and adding the Inclusion of Lesbians would make the thread more inviting and bring in new and great posters. More Inclusion, less exclusivity. It's been 3 OT's already and we haven't learned a thingMaybe, if we HAVE to change it, - Gay and Bisexual Thread |OT3| The Library Is Open (I would advocate for the inclusion of Lesbian in the title)? I like that a lot.
You're so mean.Please excuse him Billiechu.
It depends on what you consider safe, the other thread had plenty of sex talk and guys in underwear. If that's NSFW, then it needed to be marked too.
Why is that mean? Like in real life, I don't want women in a male gay/bisex bar.