I went to see this and quite a way into the film saw a parent with a young kid walk into the screening. A bit later the interview scene happened and the kid ran out crying, never to return.
Lights come up at the end of the movie and I hear a guy a few rows back say that they had taken the kid to see Inside Out 2, but because they got there late thought they would just walk into another random screen. Chose poorly.
This movie starts unbelievably strong with great visuals, audio design, acting and a surreal/occult vibe but never reaches the potential it's hinting at and the finale is okay at best. Some of the detective work is great but some is kinda goofy and the payoff isn't really great, I guess? The ending is both cool and stupid at the same time, somehow. Feels like it's missing something but I don't know why.
I think frequently cutting to segments of Longlegs doing random things was a huge mistake, it sucked the mystery out of the entire experience. Dude was just a weirdo, until he was literally Satan's minion. In a way I respect that the movie went all in with the "Satan is real" angle instead of keeping it vague.
Some insane visuals and camerawork either way, movie was beautiful to watch.
Probably because some are used to James wan Hollywood level cinematography and color grading so when they see something that looks real and not oversaturated it's "creepy".No idea what everyone is talking about "how the movie was filmed". It's pretty standard for indie horror movies. Atmosphere was cool, Nic Cage acting was cool, the mom's acting was eerie as fuck, but yeah overall the main plot was ok at best.
Id give it an 7.5/10 but horror is pretty much all I watch.Does it live up to all the media hype? I see it's available to watch now
Supposedly, the audience and the reviewers unanimously praise it, but personally, I didn't like it that much. While the atmosphere and visuals are indeed dark and great (think Zodiac), in the end - Nicolas Cage comes off as cringe instead of evil, the director relies mainly on jumpscares, crescendos and walking around abandoned houses in the dark with a flashlight, and the demonic prop they chose is such a cliché...Does it live up to all the media hype? I see it's available to watch now
That's why i ask, when a movie gets ridiculous praise i always find the final viewing to be not nearly that good.Supposedly, the audience and the reviewers unanimously praise it, but personally, I didn't like it that much. While the atmosphere and visuals are indeed dark and great (think Zodiac), in the end - Nicolas Cage comes off as cringe instead of evil, the director relies mainly on jumpscares, crescendos and walking around abandoned houses in the dark with a flashlight, and the demonic prop they chose is such a cliché...
Supposedly, the audience and the reviewers unanimously praise it
If the ending was stronger I'd bump it up a notch.Id give it an 7.5/10 but horror is pretty much all I watch.
I'm a huge sucker for stuff like this in horror movies.
Did you catch a glimpse of the goat figure standing behind Maika in the red room? It's quite early in the movie.
Does it live up to all the media hype? I see it's available to watch now
Honestly. A silence of the lambs is better to me than a flat out horror, so I like to hear that. Will check it out tonight most likely.Not at all, honestly. If you go in expecting something amazing you’re going to be disappointed. It’s a solid movie but it won’t rock your world.
Its biggest flaw could be that it is not scary, and not nearly intense enough to be considered a horror movie. Vibes are closer to Silence of the Lambs than any conventional horror movie.
New trailer
Saw it and wished I hadn't. Arcadian, for the win!
Baphomet’s silhouette appeared several times during the film. I counted 3 or 4.
I prefer Longlegs but the creatures from Arcadian had really cool monster design
Started out strong but the Cage character didn't really work for me as a real person of flesh and blood. I liked the director's previous movie a lot more (The Blackcoat's Daughter).
Just finished watching.I couldn’t see anything else than Nic Cage doing Nic Cage goofiness.
They should’ve casted someone else.
I also would have gone the "Se7en" route of removing Cage's name from the opening credits (And trailers) like they did with Kevin Spacey.
Add a little surprise ya know?
I don't think Cage made a difference. Do you watch many horror movies? It's seems like that's all he has been in for years.Given their budget was a little under 10 million and they just surpassed 100 million in the box office, I’d say at least from a business standpoint they made the right call. The strong marketing plus Cage’s involvement definitely helped put butts in seats.
Sure, maybe the reveal that Cage was in the film would quickly catch on and the following weekends would make up for a weaker opening weekend, but given that Twisters was out on Longleg’s second weekend, and then Deadpool and Wolverine out on their third weekend, it makes more sense to me for them to play their hand right away.
I don't think Cage made a difference. Do you watch many horror movies? It's seems like that's all he has been in for years.
Arcadian, Mandy, Color of Space, Renfield was horror-ish comedy. It was the marketing that made Longlegs successful imo not Cage.Yes, I’ve seen a ton of horror films. Has Cage been in a bunch recently though, or at least ones that were marketed well? Like, in terms of recent movies that got heavily marketed that Cage was in, only Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent and Renfield come to mind, and neither of those were horror.
Arcadian, Mandy, Color of Space, Renfield was horror-ish comedy. It was the marketing that made Longlegs successful imo not Cage.
We'll just have to agree to disagree. I don't think Cage was the draw. Longlegs wasn't really horror either if we're splitting hairs more like a psychological thriller with an occult aspectArcadian is action horror.
Mandy is action horror and came out in 2018.
Color Out of Space came out in 2019.
Renfield is comedy “horror”. I’m being really generous even calling it ”horror”, the film was pure comedy and was marketed as such, it just happens to have Dracula and Renfield in it.
None of these are pure horror, save Color out of Space (but I was looking for films from this decade) which is how Longlegs was marketed. Also, Cage is the actual threat in this film. They flat out had a preview of Maika walking up to Cage (with him censored to hide his appearance) and were playing the audio of Maika’s heartbeat upon seeing Cage for the first time on set. They definitely were marketing this as both scary and that Cage himself would be scary. That’s different than any of your examples.
Nah. It's well made I guess, but it's more goofy than scary, the story is shit, and the end is dumb af.Does it live up to all the media hype? I see it's available to watch now
Not at all, honestly. If you go in expecting something amazing you’re going to be disappointed. It’s a solid movie but it won’t rock your world.
Its biggest flaw could be that it is not scary, and not nearly intense enough to be considered a horror movie. Vibes are closer to Silence of the Lambs than any conventional horror movie.
That's the first thing I said after watching it. I can't tell for sure If it was way overhyped or if it was really good. The story seemed a bit overloaded and Nic Cage was too much Castor Troy to be truely scary.Just rewatched
It was a lot better on the rewatch, even though I knew the plot and what happens, and even though this was on streaming at home vs the theater. This is the kind of movie that really needs a re-watch.
Definitely had X-File vibes.Could this have been an X-File?
Could this have been an X-File?