LOST 06.17/18/18.5: "The End" (Everything Else Was Just Progress)

Status
Not open for further replies.
gdt5016 said:
Farraday time traveled all through S5. He was fine specifically because Desmond was his Constant.
I thought of that too, but what about Sawyer, Juliet, and Miles? Were they fine just by association? Or was that the candidate immunity kicking in?
 
Apoc29 said:
I thought of that too, but what about Sawyer, Juliet, and Miles? Were they fine just by association? Or was that the candidate immunity kicking in?

Uh...

Their brains were leaking out of their skulls. So no, no immunity was kicking in :lol .
 
Apoc29 said:
Yeah, but they didn't die from it. Charlotte did.

Charlotte was on the Island the longest.

Farraday explained it was an inverse relationship. The longer you've spent on the Island the quicker you start to nosebleed, the quicker you die.
 
gdt5016 said:
Charlotte was on the Island the longest.

Farraday explained it was an inverse relationship. The longer you've spent on the Island the quicker you start to nosebleed, the quicker you die.
Cool, I don't remember that part. Well, it's true that Charlotte lived on the island as a child, but went off the island for an undetermined period of time. I guess that time away doesn't 'take away' from the island time, but I won't dwell on it. Case closed.
 
Catalix said:
I'm sure these are the types of "questions" a lot of the average viewers are getting hung up on. Stuff that was clearly addressed within the context of the show.

I guess people just tend to forget that they were in fact answered, or they didn't quite piece things together yet themselves.
I guess I forgot or just wasn't paying enough attention when the episode was on. It was multiple years ago at this point, and I only gave it the single viewing, so I'm not surprised.
 
Apoc29 said:
Desmond used his constant (Penny) to stop his brain from exploding, but what did Faraday need his constant for? He wasn't afflicted as badly as Desmond. Or was the whole purpose just to tell us that "something" went wrong?
I was thinking Faraday didn't want to do all the detectove work Desmond had to do if something did happen to him.
 
lttT:

I cried at every single reunion in alternate verse and thought the finale was fantastic and I died a little when Jack died for good and the show closed.

Thank you LOST guys for making this awesome awesome series.

/love
 
gdt5016 said:
Charlotte was on the Island the longest.

Farraday explained it was an inverse relationship. The longer you've spent on the Island the quicker you start to nosebleed, the quicker you die.

How old was Charlotte when she left. Technically Sawyer was on the Island for a while and Juliet was there for a while too, they just didn't know it yet. Actualy Juliet was there for a while altogether.
 
JGS said:
How old was Charlotte when she left. Technically Sawyer was on the Island for a while and Juliet was there for a while too, they just didn't know it yet. Actualy Juliet was there for a while altogether.
Yeah, but it didn't happen yet. Even though that was the past, it was their present.
 
Dead said:
Yeah, but it didn't happen yet. Even though that was the past, it was their present.
Season 5 will forever be confusing to me (In a good way as I don't like time travel themes but liked Season 5) because I thought they always were in the 70's. This would mean that it already happened.
 
JGS said:
Season 5 will forever be confusing to me (In a good way as I don't like time travel themes but liked Season 5) because I thought they always were in the 70's. This would mean that it already happened.

It did happen, but they didn't experience it yet. It's the same reason the characters in 2004 don't remember any of the events from the '70s. It happened in the world's past, but the characters' futures.
 
JGS said:
Season 5 will forever be confusing to me (In a good way as I don't like time travel themes but liked Season 5) because I thought they always were in the 70's. This would mean that it already happened.

From a chronological viewpoint, they were always there. But for them, it hadn't happened yet.
 
Blader5489 said:
From a chronological viewpoint, they were always there. But for them, it hadn't happened yet.
OK, I was thinking of it strictly from a chronological & total number of days view since Charlotte didn't remember being there but she was affected the worst.

I understand that for the others it was at that point in time an impartial loop (I think:lol)
 
Time Travel in Lost was actually pretty simple, straight forward, and concrete. Don't get why people had/have a hard time wrapping their head around it.
 
gdt5016 said:
Time Travel in Lost was actually pretty simple, straight forward, and concrete. Don't get why people had/have a hard time wrapping their head around it.

It was about as simple and concrete as time travel can get, which means it's probably still pretty complex to people who don't spend time thinking about how time travel could work.
 
JGS said:
OK, I was thinking of it strictly from a chronological & total number of days view since Charlotte didn't remember being there but she was affected the worst.

I understand that for the others it was at that point in time an impartial loop (I think:lol)


Yeah, the difference is that Charlotte spent years there as a child. It had actually already happened to her. As of 2004, she had spent ten years (or however many) on the Island by the time she was an adult. As of 2004, Sawyer (for example) had spent only a few months on the Island even though he would live in the 70s for three years a few weeks later. Simple, see? :lol
 
Blader5489 said:
Almost as if the island was kind of like a magic box, where anything you imagined could appear.

:D
oh shit... what an obvious connection for me to miss. :lol

Thanks for making my fan-wankery 10x cooler and more relevant. I'm now in love with the potential ironic accuracy of Ben's "magic box" metaphor. :D
 
gdt5016 said:
Time Travel in Lost was actually pretty simple, straight forward, and concrete. Don't get why people had/have a hard time wrapping their head around it.
That what I like about it normally. I was confused only on the basis of the nosebleeds and some other comments about it in previous threads. I was completely following it at the time.

To me it & a Simpsons episode are the best stories on time travel.

I give Back to the Future a pass despite it's time travel issues.
 
KevinCow said:
It was about as simple and concrete as time travel can get, which means it's probably still pretty complex to people who don't spend time thinking about how time travel could work.

The only thing I don't get, so maybe you or someone else can clarify, is how the jughead (The Incident) jumped them ahead 30 years, 77 to 07. I still don't get it. That was like a different way of time travelling then had already been introduced, the broken donkey wheel. Seems it falls in the dubble mumbo-jumbo category of story telling. I assume it has something to do with the combination of electro magnetic activity pocket(The Swan) and the jughead being combined...but explain to me dear scientist how that makes any sense for time travel.
 
ErasureAcer said:
The only thing I don't get, so maybe you or someone else can clarify, is how the jughead (The Incident) jumped them ahead 30 years, 77 to 07. I still don't get it. That was like a different way of time travelling then had already been introduced, the broken donkey wheel. Seems it falls in the dubble mumbo-jumbo category of story telling. I assume it has something to do with the combination of electro magnetic activity pocket(The Swan) and the jughead being combined...but explain to me dear scientist how that makes any sense for time travel.

Well some people on the ajira plane flashed to 1977 and once they had done what they needed to do(detonate jughead, whatever happened happened) they were sent back to the present
 
ErasureAcer said:
The only thing I don't get, so maybe you or someone else can clarify, is how the jughead (The Incident) jumped them ahead 30 years, 77 to 07. I still don't get it. That was like a different way of time travelling then had already been introduced, the broken donkey wheel. Seems it falls in the dubble mumbo-jumbo category of story telling. I assume it has something to do with the combination of electro magnetic activity pocket(The Swan) and the jughead being combined...but explain to me dear scientist how that makes any sense for time travel.
The EM did that and it was simply placing them back where they belonged (Righting the wrong of them being in the 70's) in the stream of things.
 
Drealmcc0y said:
Well some people on the ajira plane flashed to 1977 and once they had done what they needed to do(detonate jughead, whatever happened happened) they were sent back to the present

I'd assume that would be the answer...that it was their destiny to detonate jughead(it had already happened in the past and thus they had to do it again. Kind of a paradox). I'm more looking towards the science aspect of it though(if there is any...which I doubt there is since I don't see today's scientists using EM activity to time travel. :lol ). Thanks for the reply anyhow.
 
Season 5 makes perfect sense if you stop imagining time as a linear progression and realise its actually a ball of... wibbly wobbly... timey wimey... stuff.
 
ErasureAcer said:
The only thing I don't get, so maybe you or someone else can clarify, is how the jughead (The Incident) jumped them ahead 30 years, 77 to 07. I still don't get it. That was like a different way of time travelling then had already been introduced, the broken donkey wheel. Seems it falls in the dubble mumbo-jumbo category of story telling. I assume it has something to do with the combination of electro magnetic activity pocket(The Swan) and the jughead being combined...but explain to me dear scientist how that makes any sense for time travel.

Yep.

Faraday said in "The Constant" that a combination of electromagnetism and radiation can cause time travel. You get enough of that energy, and you can move whole people (and islands)--rather than just consciousnesses--through time, as we saw in S5 whenever the wheel was turned.

So it was the EM pocket + jughead combo that sent the Losties back to 2007.
 
Blader5489 said:
Yep.

Faraday said in "The Constant" that a combination of electromagnetism and radiation can cause time travel. You get enough of that energy, and you can move whole people (and islands)--rather than just consciousnesses--through time, as we saw in S5 whenever the wheel was turned.

So it was the EM pocket + jughead combo that sent the Losties back to 2007.

OK. I'll leave it at that. If Faraday said it...it must be true. :lol For some reason I believe more in a broken donkey wheel for time travel than that combo...unless I'm missing something and they're the exact same thing.
 
ErasureAcer said:
I'd assume that would be the answer...that it was their destiny to detonate jughead(it had already happened in the past and thus they had to do it again. Kind of a paradox). I'm more looking towards the science aspect of it though(if there is any...which I doubt there is since I don't see today's scientists using EM activity to time travel. :lol ). Thanks for the reply anyhow.
I was speaking from a scientific view they didn't belong there either. The "science" of time travel (If it were possible) would have required a correction to take place too wouldn't it?
 
Even though I liked S5, I feel like the way the O6 goes back in time was really contrived. It just... happens. No explanation or anything, outside of an implied "the island/Jacob did it." We also never got a reason why the Others didn't time skip with our Losties, or why nobody else around the Swan was sent to '07 with our Losties, or why Jughead sent them straight to '07. That's probably my biggest gripe with the series.
 
RedShift said:
Season 5 makes perfect sense if you stop imagining time as a linear progression and realise its actually a ball of... wibbly wobbly... timey wimey... stuff.

well that started off sounding good
 
KevinCow said:
Even though I liked S5, I feel like the way the O6 goes back in time was really contrived. It just... happens. No explanation or anything, outside of an implied "the island/Jacob did it." We also never got a reason why the Others didn't time skip with our Losties, or why nobody else around the Swan was sent to '07 with our Losties, or why Jughead sent them straight to '07. That's probably my biggest gripe with the series.
I did not care for the plane trip but at the same time, I think among the Losties, it was random since the exact conditions weren't met. For evryone else, they weren't a art of the O6. Since they were never on the Island, they never time travelled.

The reverse is the case with the Swan. No one else was out of sync so there was no reason for them to travel. Only the Losties messed up by leaving the Island and so they were the ones impacted by whole time travel thing.
 
Anyone else pissed that MIB never had a name? What was the point of that? Was he just never given one? Did they just hide it from us? It was such a puzzling thing for the writers to leave out his name. It was mystery for the sake of mystery which is BS.
 
I'll never understand being upset that MIB didn't have a name. It's a name! It doesn't have to have any importance. The writers never indicated it had any importance. There was never a scene where Sawyer asks Flocke his name and he just smiles evilly, knowingly. There was never a mystery there.
 
Mifune said:
I'll never understand being upset that MIB didn't have a name. It's a name! It doesn't have to have any importance. The writers never indicated it had any importance. There was never a scene where Sawyer asks Flocke his name and he just smiles evilly, knowingly. There was never a mystery there.

They did when his mother said that she only had name for one child. They explicitly bring up the odd scenario of his namelessness. Why do that?
 
It makes some sense that the MiB doesn't have a name. For as long as we've known him (even when we didn't know about him) he has been pretending to be other people. He's assumed the identity of countless dead people, pretended to be Jacob and then finally assumed the form of John Locke.

Jacob needed a name in the story because he was this invisible, man behind the curtain, that gave instructions to a body of people through an intermediary.. the name alone would carry authority/finality.

The MiB is a completely different kind of character, clandestinely infiltrating and manipulating people and again, assuming whomever's identity that was most useful at any given time.
 
JGS said:
That what I like about it normally. I was confused only on the basis of the nosebleeds and some other comments about it in previous threads. I was completely following it at the time.

To me it & a Simpsons episode are the best stories on time travel.

I give Back to the Future a pass despite it's time travel issues.

Isn't Back to the Future the standard on time travel stories due to how concrete and logical it is?

The Lost time travel was confusing, but simple when you figure it out. Back to the Future laid out it's rules in front of you so that you could follow it.
 
Finished it 2 nights ago.

Cried like a fucking baby at the end there, and my wife didn't cry because she didn't get it.

So I'm sitting there trying to explain that the alt timeline is purgatory, and she can't even understand me :lol :lol

Such a great finale. I'm still in awe.

They drove the point home that the show wasn't about the island, it was about the characters.

Any holes/good theories pop up in the past 200+ pages? I read the first 60 and gave up.
 
Major Williams said:
Finished it 2 nights ago.

Cried like a fucking baby at the end there, and my wife didn't cry because she didn't get it.

So I'm sitting there trying to explain that the alt timeline is purgatory, and she can't even understand me :lol :lol

Such a great finale. I'm still in awe.

They drove the point home that the show wasn't about the island, it was about the characters.

Any holes/good theories pop up in the past 200+ pages? I read the first 60 and gave up.

Is this what you looked like?

5trag.png
 
Oni Jazar said:
Or maybe, they did it to see what fools would try to defend it?
So bitter. yeesh.

It's Samuel, btw.
 
They chose to leave out his name, and it's not like it was ever brought up as a mystery.

I'm thinking they left out MIB's name to highlight, like the above poster said, his thousands of years of being someone else.

Also, he's supposed to be the physical personification of Evil, that might work better without a name. So meh, nothing to get too worked up about.

I have no opinion either way, but like I said, doesn't bother me he was never named.
 
Willy105 said:
Isn't Back to the Future the standard on time travel stories due to how concrete and logical it is?

The Lost time travel was confusing, but simple when you figure it out. Back to the Future laid out it's rules in front of you so that you could follow it.
It's the standard bearer but not because of logic at least to me.

Just one issue I had with it even as a kid was the fact that despite major personality changes, he and his siblings were born the exact same day and date as when his family was screwed up. However, Back to the Future is a fantastic movie so I'm unable to dislike it. Ditto for T2.

Most time travel stories are too linear to me where if one thing changes all you have to do is fix that one thing. In reality, you would have to fix a thousand things.

I liked LOST time travel because it was already self contained even though we didn't know it at the time - whatever happened, happened.
 
BttF has some major time travel holes in it. Lost doesn't.

They also use completely different types of time travel.

Edit: Actually, the only TT hole Lost has is the compass. But that was on purpose, IIRC. They talked about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom