Drealmcc0y
Banned
I wish you would write in normal paragraphs you make it hard to respond too
MMaRsu said:Ohh jesus erigu
lol
Treefingers said:Bah this argument is gonna repeat forever, I might as well unsubscribe.
Can't believe it's only been a year since the finale. Feels like ages =(
An opinion that matches theirstycoonheart said:At least he's thought things through and isn't just stubbornly claiming shit. Dude is even providing links to direct quotes from the creators of the show. What more do you need to form a good argument?
It's provable through dangling plotlines and things said in interviews.Drealmcc0y said:But it almost always comes down to "they're hack writers they're making it up as they go along"
But theres no way to prove it, so you got nothing.
dave is ok said:An opinion that matches theirs
dave is ok said:The fact that Ben Linus was originally a three episode part proves it alone.
Did you or anyone think they wrote every episode and season of LOST before the pilot?dave is ok said:It's provable through dangling plotlines and things said in interviews.
The fact that Ben Linus was originally a three episode part proves it alone.
Most television writers don't make the claims that the Lost showrunners did. I assume the mythology when the show started was about one sentence long. Probably something like 'The island holds something very valuable which the monster defends'.DeathNote said:Did you or anyone think they wrote every episode and season of LOST before the pilot?
Every television series has writing and new ideas done between each season.
They said they knew the overall mythology from the get go, and did what every other television writers do, decide what they wanted to do with the mythology season by season.
That gives room to extend a character's life.
If this makes you a television writing hack, every television writer is.
For proof, read Erigus posts. He's far more elegant than I amDrealmcc0y said:^So basically it comes down to the writers making it up as they go along with NO proof to back it up
Again
Hmk
dave is ok said:For proof, read Erigus posts. He's far more elegant than I am
I think Lost is a very, very stupid show.BenjaminBirdie said:I do have a problem with how Erigu frames his arguments as personal attacks on individuals
Do you think they did?DeathNote said:They said they knew the overall mythology from the get go
They admitted they didn't know what was in the hatch when they wrote it, among other things. So not knowing that means not knowing much about the Dharma Initiative, nothing about the Incident, etc. etc.Drealmcc0y said:What does overall mythology even mean though lol
None of us could possibly fucking know, so the fact that erigu and others like him use it as the main reason for why the show sucks is fucking hilarious.
Drealmcc0y said:But it almost always comes down to "they're hack writers they're making it up as they go along"
But theres no way to prove it, so you got nothing.
tycoonheart said:As far as lost goes, I can't think of any of the early season mysteries that was handled well in the later seasons. The lamest one was the reveal that the whispers belonged to the spirits that were stuck on the island. So when you include a mystery and can't seem to provide a reasonable, well thought out explanation later on in the show, people aren't going to be happy. I think we're arguing that these explanation seemed tacked on and not well thought out. It doesn't matter if it wasn't thought out early on the show or later... just that it needs to be tied together much better than what they provided us with.
Drealmcc0y said:What does overall mythology even mean though lol
Drealmcc0y said:Well thats just your fucking opinion really because i thought it came together really well.
tycoonheart said:The point of the show.
The show ends up being about two guys battling each other. One trying to leave the island, who is supposedly evil and the other trying his best to not let that happen.
If I had told you this at the end of, I dunno, Season 3, you'd have probably told me I'm crazy.
tycoonheart said:And I said that...
"I think we're arguing that these explanation seemed tacked on"
We as in those of us in here who aren't happy with what the show ended becoming.
Drealmcc0y said:You wanna have a reasonable discussion about what you didnt like? Thats great, I would love to discuss that with you.
But im tired of saying this now. So im going to leave it at that.
Exactly. Heck, it's almost impossible to plan several years of a TV show in advance. Even if you only come up with a general outline, you're at the mercy of so many variables...tycoonheart said:It is okay for the creators/writers to not know something specific. If they can, in the future, tie things together nicely, I think the viewers will respect it.
I loved how Michael dropped by just for that.As far as lost goes, I can't think of any of the early season mysteries that was handled well in the later seasons. The lamest one was the reveal that the whispers belonged to the spirits that were stuck on the island.
tycoonheart said:I'm not trying to make up your mind for you. I'm okay with you liking the show. Good for you. Some of us who are questioning certain aspects of the show... that doesn't matter to you. And that is fine. But you have to understand that the questions Erigu's brought up are valid and certainly you can understand how that can make someone dislike the show, right?
Solo said:Erigu is Jack and dreal is Locke
tycoonheart said:So does that mean Dreal is going to leave this thread forever and Erigu is going to be the one who has a change of heart and defends the show rather than bringing up its inconsistencies?
Man, we both lose...Solo said:Erigu is Jack and dreal is Locke
Drealmcc0y said:Btw who turned out to be right about most everything
Willy105 said:Locke. But he died a sad lonely man.
Government-man said:I tried to scan the last few pages to see if this link has been posted but it was just all arguments so I'll just post this interesting follow up with the cast from EW.com:
'Lost': Catching Up With the Cast
Assume whatever you want, but saying they are hacks because of standard telvision writing procedures is ridiculous. What claims did they make?dave is ok said:Most television writers don't make the claims that the Lost showrunners did. I assume the mythology when the show started was about one sentence long. Probably something like 'The island holds something very valuable which the monster defends'.
DeathNote said:Assume whatever you want, but saying they are hacks because of standard telvision writing procedures is ridiculous. What claims did they make?
In 2005,
"Cuse and Lindelof strongly dispute a contention they sometimes hear: that they are making up the series as they go along. They say mysteries and answers were part of a show "bible" devised early on. There are explanations for the monster, the polar bear, the hatch in the ground, the French woman and the island itself.
"We have a board in the writers' room with all extant mysteries: What questions are in play? Every time you put one up, you hopefully take one off," Lindelof says. Some answers will come by season's end; in addition, one of the 14 regulars will die."
In 2007, after Season 3, Calrton Cuse said "we specific designs for ending the next two seasons".
Also after season 3:
"BuddyTV: Is there enough information given on the show that someone could put together a fact-based theory that more or less explains whats going on, on the island?
Damon Lindelof: I think that there are bits and pieces that someone could put together. Recently Carlton and I put out to the Yahoo community all over the world, what do you think the monster is? And some people came alarmingly close to what its origins were, how it functions, what its purpose is, but they werent able to go the next level as Carlton says, deeper into saying, Thats what it is but what does that mean in the grander scheme of what the island is. It doesnt mean that someone couldnt accidentally back into it and anticipate something that they havent seen yet. But sort of the real hardcore intel about the island is going to start to reveal itself towards the end of the season as we learn more about the others."
A few months before season 6 Calrton Cuse said:
"Although I acknowledge that people are really interested in the creative process of Lost, mostly it pertains to ... it all goes back to the idea of, "Are we making it up as we go along?" That's the question that people really want to know the answer to, and they want some proof. They want us to document the fact that we weren't making it up as we went along. And, in the spirit of the show, we just have to say, "If you choose to believe us, then that's what faith is all about." If you choose to disbelieve it, then we don't blame you. At the end of the day, all that matters is the story itself. If you feel satisfied by it, it shouldn't matter whether we had it planned from Day 1 or whether we made it up as we went along. In some places we did have to make it up as we went along, because Adewale (Akinnuoye-Agbaje) wanted to leave the show, or the Nikki and Paolo idea didn't work, or we didn't have an end date so we had to tap dance, or we went over-budget so we had to put them in cages for four episodes in a row. There are certain things where we had to adapt to whatever real-world scenario was happening with the show. But creatively speaking in general, there had to be a plan."
Approaching the finale here are some quotes from CC and DL:
"You know, Stephen King, who really helped catalyze our push to get an end date to the show was like, I make it all up as I go along. I just start writing my books and then they go where they go."
"There were two creative periods in the show. The period prior to the middle of the third season when we didn't know how long we'd have to go, and then the period following that moment, where we knew exactly how long we had to go, and there were two very different ways of writing."
No comment from 2005, 2007, or 2010 contradicts eachother. They had an overall lueprint, a season by season blue print, and wiggle room for episode by episode. Anyone with with half a brain after season 1 would know there would be filler not thought up yet since there was no end date.
dave is ok said:Yet the show got worse after Season 3, when they supposedly had the endgame stuff planned out
brandonh83 said:I thought seasons 4 and 6 were way better than 1, 2 and 3. IMO season 4 had the best pacing and one of the most thrilling finales, and the last season, I found it to have the most depth and emotion.
Season 5 was underwhelming though. A few standout moments, but by far the worst season.