Always-honest
Banned
I liked part 1 despite of its faws. but i part 2 you'd expect many improvements (that were needed).
no buy, no rent, no nothing.
no buy, no rent, no nothing.
wayward archer said:Rereading this thread, I haven't seen anybody arguing that everybody should like this game and should be forced to buy it and "deal with it". However I have seen people implying NOBODY should like this game, or that everybody should just accept that it's a 'mediocre game', which is ridiculous.
Kabuki Waq said:err..... you seem to have answered your own question there :lol
Kabuki Waq said:read the post below yours.
Always-honest said:I liked part 1 despite of its faws. but i part 2 you'd expect many improvements (that were needed).
Varth said:It's difficult not to hate that particular level on single player. Have you ever seen Modern Times? It looks like the scene where Charlot has to cope with 50 duties all by himself, running like crazy from one place to another.
Unregistered007 said:To the poeple who are surprised that the PS3 version is being reported with problems, I am surprised at you. Here is the solution that has worked for me since last year regardingweaker ports
Just give up on 3rd party software already if you own a 360 as well.
Unregistered007 said:To the poeple who are surprised that the PS3 version is being reported with problems, I am surprised at you. Here is the solution that has worked for me since last year regardingweaker ports
Just give up on 3rd party software already if you own a 360 as well.
Unregistered007 said:To the poeple who are surprised that the PS3 version is being reported with problems, I am surprised at you. Here is the solution that has worked for me since last year regardingweaker ports
Just give up on 3rd party software already if you own a 360 as well.
Poimandres said:Hey, look, some good news!
Game Informer gave LP2 an 8.5 in the latest issue
Edit: just noticed Pylon is already on top of it. Carry on.
thetrin said:Totally, because Darksiders didn't have better framerate on PS3, and Street Fighter IV totally isn't the definitive version. Thanks!
You know what would be great? If we all judged on a game by game basis, rather than blanket statements.
Phoenix Fang said:After the update they both were equal. That was regardng Darksiders, but how is Street Fighter IV the definitive version?
Xamdou said:For those Gafers who have played the game, is the game as fun as the original? Is it a substantial improvement over the original in terms of gameplay?
thetrin said:I certainly like it a lot more. I've only done the first 2 episodes, but the Snow Pirate stages that were wide open were a lot more fun than the corridors in the Nevec level.
That said, the Category G Akrid bosses were fun as hell. I'm looking forward to playing more tomorrow.
Xamdou said:For those Gafers who have played the game, is the game as fun as the original? Is it a substantial improvement over the original in terms of gameplay?
CloakedPuppet said:I enjoyed Lost Planet 1 mainly due to it's admittedly flawed single player player campaign. I was really interested in LP2 but by most reports, the single player experience is worthless. I realize that Capcom wanted to focus on the multi-player element in the sequel but shipping a game with a broken single player is downright ridiculous. At least RE5 was playable and, to me, quite a lot of fun solo.
Im one of those folks who doesnt have a single real world friend who is a gamer (gasp!). The idea of playing through a game with random strangers is not enticing at all. It seems like I may be in the minority with developers willing to neglect major portions of their games in favour of the cooperative experience. Guess I'll be voting with my wallet this time around, Capcom.
Oh well, Red Dead Redemption is only a week away.
Price Drop said:Single player was fine to me. In fact, I enjoyed playing the train level without co-op buddies dying and then subsequently losing Battle Guage Points (lose all BG points and the mission ends). But the game does excel in co-op with actual strategy and communication elements.
The ally AI will always fight and kill things for you, but you'll have to complete major objectives yourself.
geebee said:For those who are playing through the single player.. how's the music sound?
I don't usually care for orchestrated soundtracks in games since they can sometimes be a bit over-the-top and come off as cheesy, but I liked the title and menu songs in the demo and the first game's soundtrack.
ScHlAuChi said:So is it better or worse than the 1st one?
ScHlAuChi said:So is it better or worse than the 1st one?
BenjaminBirdie said:Are you playing by yourself?
CloakedPuppet said:I enjoyed Lost Planet 1 mainly due to it's admittedly flawed single player player campaign. I was really interested in LP2 but by most reports, the single player experience is worthless. I realize that Capcom wanted to focus on the multi-player element in the sequel but shipping a game with a broken single player is downright ridiculous. At least RE5 was playable and, to me, quite a lot of fun solo.
Im one of those folks who doesnt have a single real world friend who is a gamer (gasp!). The idea of playing through a game with random strangers is not enticing at all. It seems like I may be in the minority with developers willing to neglect major portions of their games in favour of the cooperative experience. Guess I'll be voting with my wallet this time around, Capcom.
Oh well, Red Dead Redemption is only a week away.
How do the rest of the maps compare to the (horrible) one they put into the LP2 demo? I think the only LP1 map I hated more than that one was the 8-bit one.LeMaximilian said:It's better. Really enjoying the MP. Pirate Fortress was one of the only maps I played in the first game, since I avidly disliked most the others. But, they all feel pretty good so far in LP2. Haven't touched much of the campaign yet...waiting for 3 people to play with.
Coxswain said:How do the rest of the maps compare to the (horrible) one they put into the LP2 demo? I think the only LP1 map I hated more than that one was the 8-bit one.
Awww, c'mon. For people playing the PS3 version, are the controls absolutely, positively L1 to zoom and R1 to shoot? I'm sorry if it's been mentioned already.Kabuki Waq said:well you are in the minority if you never once felt the need to run and shoot in RE5. This thread is typical for Mid hype b level games. "Omg all teh reviewers are wrong...they shouldnt compare games....blah blah blah"
Fact is if your standards are low enough you can enjoy anything. Be happy you can do that. But dont try to pretend issues dont exist and players should just "deal with it".
Also when Agent Otaku gets hyped for a game it is time to worry
purple cobra said:L1 to zoom
Unfortunately not. You need to play an offline game for splitscreen.somesplace said:can you play this game split-screen plus online? i mean, if i want to play with my roommate, can we fill the other two spots with random online players?
It's the other way round actually: -thetrin said:I was always under the impressions that the PS3 version of SFIV had better detail in the backgrounds (not that it really matters at all).
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-street-fighter-iv-article?page=2Xbox 360 boasts superior lighting and higher resolution textures on a handful of the backdrops, and the characters have additional self-shadows not seen in the PlayStation 3 game. Speaking of shadows, they're smoother and better defined all-round on Xbox 360 too. Other omissions only found in the PS3 build are somewhat odd too - for example, while mountains are reflected in the water, boats aren't. The waterfall in the night-time jungle scene has an additional specular map completely absent on PlayStation 3. Indeed, the jungle itself is more detailed on the Microsoft console, and blended back on PS3.
Back to the LP2 talk.ANYWAY, that's not really what this thread is about. It's about Lost planet 2!