shagg_187 said:Has officially become a fanfiction now...![]()
Because of a completely out-of-context clip?
shagg_187 said:Has officially become a fanfiction now...![]()
Dead said:What they died for sneak peek 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcElsT1oL14
I would think so. Wasn't Christian carrying a torch in one episode?Yaweee said:Wait, so the ghosts are corporeal? WTF
Who says its a ghost?Yaweee said:Wait, so the ghosts are corporeal? WTF
PhoncipleBone said:I would think so. Wasn't Christian carrying a torch in one episode?
Dead said:Who says its a ghost?
niceVargas said:What They Died For Sneak peek # 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtsMPxsGU5A
I'm glad the ashes haven't been forgotten, makes me hope for more Jacob/MiB backstory.Vargas said:What They Died For Sneak peek # 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtsMPxsGU5A
The Big Rig said:God I hope this next episode redeems Lost for me.
Vargas said:What They Died For Sneak peek # 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtsMPxsGU5A
Vargas said:What They Died For Sneak peek # 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtsMPxsGU5A
I doubt it. It's just build up to the finale, don't expect any huge revelations.
Damn. That shit is deep.Vargas said:What They Died For Sneak peek # 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtsMPxsGU5A
Lonestar said:Sawyer would have gone on and on, blaming Jack for Killing them.
Solo said:Er, what? He knows its his fault and says as much :lol
The Big Rig said:God I hope this next episode redeems Lost for me.
I watched it, and man oh man, did I not expect to seetim1138 said:I've heard from a couple people the entire final episode has leaked online, but I haven't actually seen a link to it or any hard evidence.
Anyone else heard this rumor?
SpeedingUptoStop said:I watched it, and man oh man, did I not expect to seeVincent swallow Bernard's 3 year old bottle of viagra and wander around the island for 2.5 hours with a RAGING hard on.
Arment said:If the finale leaked, would you watch it?
I think I would, but then I'd have to watch everything I say for the next two weeks in the official posts.
I think the major spoiler thread would erupt.
And that video sucked. :/ All text no funny.
Considering we have one episode left before it?Arment said:If the finale leaked, would you watch it?
I think I would, but then I'd have to watch everything I say for the next two weeks in the official posts.
I think the major spoiler thread would erupt.
gdt5016 said:I no rite, it's been sucking for so long now.
(22 hours if you didn't like AtS)
I was pretty much kidding. It was an ok episode, but the season has been pretty great.gdt5016 said:I no rite, it's been sucking for so long now.
(22 hours if you didn't like AtS)
Nameless said:I like this thread. It' so ...tranquil
anywho, digging both of the sneak peaks. Are there no flashsideways next episode.? Usually one of sneak peak is on island and the other is X-timeline.
Okay, finally, I have to ask, simply because it's been driving me nuts for a year and a half: what's going on with showing the other half of the outrigger shootout?
CC: The outrigger shootout is not something we're bending around in gyrations so we can solve it. In the grand scheme of the show, that is a fairly obscure piece of the show. It is your particular obsession...
DL: ...and you're not alone in it.
CC: You're not alone in it. And yes, it would have been great if we had had the opportunity to close the time loop. But you can't get everything done and keeping the narrative going in a straight line. This is one of those things where we made a very conscious choice to ask, "What are the big questions? And most importantly, what are the paths of these characters? Where do they lead?" And we followed those paths and tried not to trip ourselves up getting too diverted from that. We felt that that's the thing that's ultimately going to make the finale work or not work. We got to the point where we made the finale we wanted to make, that was our approach, and I think it was the only approach we could take. We sat here in my office, had breakfast every day for six years, talked about the show, and we used this gut check methodology, where if we both loved something and thought it was cool, that would go in. We applied that same methodology to the finale, and that was the only way we could do it. We came up with a finale that we thought was cool, that was emotional and one we really liked. That's the best we could do.
DL: When we wrote that scene and somebody started shooting at them, we knew exactly who was shooting at them. That is not a dangling thread that we don't know the answer to. That being said, as we started talking about paying that off this season, it felt like the episode was at the service of closing the time loop, as opposed to what the characters might actually be doing in that scenario. It never felt organic. We decided we would rather take our lumps from the people who couldn't scratch that itch than to produce an episode that was in service of putting people in an outrigger and getting shot at.
You put people in a lot of outriggers this season. It feels, frankly, like you're taunting me.
DL: We can't entirely deny that we're taunting you.
CC: Honestly, though, the logistics of getting all the participants in the outriggers in the configuration that was on the A-side of the time loop was actually really daunting.
DL: Considering half of them had been killed off
CC: It's not like we didn't want to do it. Like Damon says, it was just too much of a narrative deviation to do it.
Okay, you've now said at a couple of points here that you're not going to reveal the name of the Man in Black. Is there a significance to that, or you've just decided you prefer the air of mystery it gives the character to not give him a name?
CC: I think for us to explain why we're not giving him a name veers too far into the territory of explaining things that we don't feel the need to explain.
Exactly. It is like asking why didn't Ben want to read Carrie for the book club. It doesnt matter in the end (although I did find his reaction to Juliet reading it funny).randomwab said:What outrigger is he talking about? The scene in the fifth season where they're being shot at?
Who gives a flying fuck, answer some of the bigger questions.
TITUS WELLIVER (MAN IN BLACK):
I was running the other day and a rabbi pulled up on his bicycle and rode about a mile alongside me, just talking about the show. He was an inordinately bright guy and a devout Lost fan. He said an interesting thing. If you notice, the Smoke Monster goes after people who are not really pure in their intentions. Hes sort of an odd instrument of justice. He said maybe the reason it would be devastating for Smokey to ever get off the island is if he does punish evil, he would probably decimate 80 percent of mankind. There wouldnt be many people left because theres so much sin in the world.
Maybe those answers will come through Terry OQuinn. Ill have to live vicariously through him that was my last Lost appearance. Its been a fun ride.
Considering how many groups had guns, I figured it was one those groups.VistraNorrez said:Seriously never cared about the outrigger. When I saw people complaining about it, I had to search just to remember what it was.
Yea, I suppose it does, given how Locke can't change and there won't be any flashbacks.Costanza said:Makes sense.
Aesius said:The outrigger scene seems like it could have been filmed and put into an episode so easily.
I was really convinced it was going to show Juliet shooting either Miles or Sawyer, though.
The thing about this though, they way I see it is that you can't really have a scene where a major character gets taken out by a happenstance of time travel. it just wouldn't have a large impact. It'd just be a sudden "wtf!!" followed by a ton of "why would they shoot him like that, that's stupid." And if it was just a random moment where no one was really harmed, people would say "well, that was lame."Aesius said:The outrigger scene seems like it could have been filmed and put into an episode so easily.
I was really convinced it was going to show Juliet shooting either Miles or Sawyer, though.