Yeah, I'd like to hear from Trigger. The issue raised at the end of last day phase and revisited at the beginning here wasn't answered, of Ty talking for Trigger, and Ty's weirdly snarky/defensive "I didn't actually ask you" remark when I provided posts doesn't address but instead deflects. And Trigger skated in, dropped a little bit, and skated back out. I'll give Ty the pass because he's moving but Trigger can come in and speak and theorize and unpack and yet what's happening there?
The patterns I'm seeing here, whether they mean anything or not, is both Sorian and Royal targeting Ouro and I, and there's a pattern of both of them roleclaiming with info that was already available in the thread - no breadcrumb or anything. If any of it is true (and Ouro seems to confirm some of this whole story), it's maybe the "true" part that the lies are piggybacking on.
Kark, I think you do make a point that the claims we've seen have been easy to construct, but that was also the case with OuroKitty's - we made that case, in fact, several people - and yet it turned out to be true, so I'm wary of going down the same path even if I wonder about Sawrian. I'll say two things here: if Sawrian is scum, then I wonder how they're managing to scum hunt better than half the town and if they're not town, town needs to step up. Questions aside, they're not just active, but productive. I'm hesitant to vote them today even if I'm not sure about their claim for that reason.
I will say however that while Flush lamented in our chat that he was bad at breadcrumbing and wished he could figure out more ways to do it here, I did prod a lot about chat as breadcrumbs before we claimed. I did it several times during that day phase. So no breadcrumbs is not quite true, and it looks like Sorian dropped some hints, too, though I can't speak to their veracity.
I 100% agree.
What would you suggest we do this Day Phase to get people talking more since everyone is so quiet.
That's the question, isn't it? It may be time to start voting people who aren't productively active. I don't mean people dealing with stuff or commitments, but people still talking about gut reads or feelings and nothing else - by now, surely you have some analysis or evidence or something to go with it - or people just driving by and coasting. Prod votes get a little more high stakes now, especially without clear suspects. What do you think?
I already answered this. He's left literally 0 impression on me. All the new sub ins have if I'm being honest.
All? D:
I do, however, feel this way about rachors. And I'm not sure what to make of it, but I'll get into that in a sec.