I should be sleeping right now, so sorry if this comes out weird, but here's my argument that
[m] Coppanuva & [m] Flame_AC are either a Neutral role (which we should lynch anyways) or Loveless.
Hunt the Lowest Hanging Fruit and Pressure (i.e. "safe") Votes
1. Coppanuva is
the first to vote for my team after my role claim; a pressure vote for answers. Doesn't look out of place, of course; it'd be a reasonable response to what I did.
2. Flame_AC is the first to vote for Blargonaut's team, which
he does immediately following their role claim. States that he's not willing to deal with a miller.
After stating that his vote is fluid, Coppanuva's votes begin to shift regularly as a means to solely pressure people. I don't like it when one openly admits their votes are just for "pressure," and not actually because they think someone might be scum. It's a way to avoid assuming any hard stances; to avoid giving anyone ammunition regarding your voting patterns.
So, after people start to suspect them and they get some heat, their activity shifts to prodding low activity posters, because those aren't the people who'll put up a fight anyways but it still makes them seem like they're actively pursuing something:
-
Coppanuva to CzarTim
-
Flame_AC to MagnumBoy20xx
-
Coppanuva to TL21xx
etc. The only thing this pair use their votes for are to prod people who aren't talking enough. Aside from Flame wanting to kill the Millers, there's no clear tell of who they are actually against right now, or who they trust.
Attempts to Subtly Incriminate
1. Flame_AC was the firstand only other than Gorlak
to refer to my comment of "screw love" as a point of suspicion when the game's about Love triumphing.
2. Flame_AC
calls me out on a "bad reactionary vote."
Referring to the Majority
1. Flame_AC:
However I also think that it is pointless if I'm the only one on the lynch train. If consensus is that we'll address Blarg Day 2/3/4 or whenever, then I'll wait till then and then try and lynch the miller. I get what you are pointing out, but in a game where it probably will take around 10 or 12 votes to lynch someone, if that level of support isn't there right now,
2. Flame_AC:
Be careful not to dogpile everyone, we don't want to end conversation by deciding on Flux/Time.
Motivations(?)
1. Flame_AC
started off quite insistent that a good doctor role should protect the only claimed town role on the subsequent Night phase.
2. Flame_AC is strangely insistent on lynching someone on D1. In his first post and
in a subsequent one.
There's not much to go on quite yetwhat with it being D1 and allbut these are what I think are putting me off from this team currently, and why I think they're either Neutral or Mafia. They were quite talkative at first, but they started to relent once people started focusing on the pair.
Something to note is that Gorlak has been defending this team, while others have mainly been having null/scum reads:
Furthermore I don't see Coppa and Flame as a very noticeable team. They voted for different people... so? It's still early, but I'm not lynching them based on this fact alone?!
I've not paid great attention to Flame and Coppa just yet, simply because they didn't stand out. Reread all their posts just now.
They are fairly active and quickly jumped on both of the claims with a vote (which others did as well). Worringly about this might be the fact that they retracted from their standpoints pretty fast once they experienced headwind on those matters. Withdrawing from your view this early is a sign of insecurity. Still I don't feel this would be anywhere near enough to vote for them.