He was talking about me saying that lynching him was objectively the best decision for town. fwiw I think that's too weak on it's own scum read you for, I just thought it was funny.What was Kawl talking about there? I don't remember.
He was talking about me saying that lynching him was objectively the best decision for town. fwiw I think that's too weak on it's own scum read you for, I just thought it was funny.What was Kawl talking about there? I don't remember.
I just want to throw this question out there now, in case for some reason I'm not back before the deadline.
Over the course of D3 a lot of us have been posting read lists.
One team has consistently shown up on the Mafia/Neutral zone in each persons lists however they have virtually no votes on them at the moment.
To put things simply, I would love for everyone to explain their reasoning behind why they're not voting to lynch Flame_AC & Coppanova.
Not enough of a case against them yet. The most incriminating thing I have on them is the odd voting behavior from D2.
I probably won't be here before the deadline ends, so I'll be keeping my vote.
Assuming you're townZipped, friend, I'm gonna have to go with this for now.
VOTE: UltraJay
Let's see what the final hours bring.
Assuming you're town
You know scum 1 targeted Cabinter
You know scum 2 targeted you guys
You know scum 3 is dead
You know 3 scum in a 15 player game is standard
UltraJay/BooBoo'n haven't been the towniest of townies, I agree, but isn't it a bit of a stretch to assume they are the fourth scum? I feel if anyone can be ignored for now it's them.
Zipped, friend, I'm gonna have to go with this for now.
VOTE: UltraJay
Let's see what the final hours bring.
Mhm by the way... no night kill... is it possible that was a hidden scum player?
3 seems low for this particular game
VOTE: Gorlak
For me it's an overall feeling that you don't care about town. Your opinions went from hard on Blawl to doubting everything to voting a third party to turboing Blawl. Doubting is townie, but I want the reasons.
For whatever reason Launch said he asked for the turbo while Gorlak seems to think was the person asking.
Zipped, friend, I'm gonna have to go with this for now.
VOTE: UltraJay
Let's see what the final hours bring.
Assuming you're town
You know scum 1 targeted Cabinter
You know scum 2 targeted you guys
You know scum 3 is dead
You know 3 scum in a 15 player game is standard
UltraJay/BooBoo'n haven't been the towniest of townies, I agree, but isn't it a bit of a stretch to assume they are the fourth scum? I feel if anyone can be ignored for now it's them.
I'm not sure how you've determined hard facts about how many did or did not use their powers.
As for this game, 6 mafia voices+ votes vs. 24 town voices+votes seems like a difficult uphill battle.
RE: The actual count of mafia, I still contend that there may be a mixed pair - a pair where one is mafia and the partner is town but doesn't know it. I'm not sure how he/she would be outfitted in terms of actions, but it'd be a fun thing to do. I've heard bears like fun.
Could Burb confirm if the "you" in the last sentence is plural?Sample Role PM said:You and your pair's shared role is Ordinary Pair of Lovers. You are Aligned with LOVE (That means TOWN).
To be honest, I thought that Gorlak turbo'd when I asked because my post was like 3 mins before he did it, but he never confirmed he would do it before actually hammering. I think I mentioned something similar to that previously, but I just want to clarify. Gorlak's presence of late has been significantly less than what it was last week, so I guess excuse him from seeming detached.
I've thought about it, but I think it would be against the rules:
Could Burb confirm if the "you" in the last sentence is plural?
How did you ask him? In the boat chat or by voting for Blawl yourself?
A mixed scum/town role is a thought I was entertaining, but its problematic for both players. It was the major controversy in Animal Crossing.
A mixed scum/town role is a thought I was entertaining, but its problematic for both players. It was the major controversy in Animal Crossing.
Seems to hint that there are no scums in lover chats.Scum has one big scum chat, no separate lover chats.
However, the scum chat has been given reasonable information about how lover chats function.
This was brought up in the pregame.
http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=194590557&postcount=1135
(Yes you can trust Sorian)
Ok, I'll stop assuming shit, but I'm not feeling UltraBoo for a looser version of that logic - I don't expect you'll track a mafia and not see anything. I rather work on the behavior evidence we have from our dear friend Flux
This is such an Ourobolus game
Eh... don't think so. Maybe a bit too crazy, and if you open that box you are actively encouraging for pairs to tear themselves apart with suspicion and doubt. If I think about it for a second, I actually don't like this at all.A mixed scum/town role is a thought I was entertaining, but its problematic for both players. It was the major controversy in Animal Crossing.
What I do feel uneasy about is Karu and Dusk Soldier. Are we piling on because of low activity and bad reasoning?
If you wanna kill us at least give us the courtesy of the long form case.I'm leaning on the latter.
Would you all hate me if I posted a fairly light post with 14 quotes or do I have to trim it down?
If you wanna kill us at least give us the courtesy of the long form case.
Which I think is the case right now.Are we piling on because of low activity and bad reasoning?
I'm not sure what you want me to tell you.Also where's MagnumBoy been batsnacks? He hasn't posted here since the 28th, I had questions for him (well really, I'd just like him to participate more).
00:52Hello, fellow lovers...
*looks around*
Uh oh.
What's the word on the streets? Three mafia pairs?
If Karu is scum he seems completely detached to what they are doing. After Blawl's claim I imagine scum would try to fake an opinion of it. Not ask how many scum members we think there are...i didn't notice, thanks! =)There's been other things going on, honey.
Cop Claim - I want to here from Tim.
Miller Claim - Okay.
Feel like this being a scum play would be way too easy to blow up on first sight. Eh...
In a vacuum this reads like town to me. Distancing yourself from Blawl is probably a good idea as scum, but he seems quite set on lynching them down the line.I'm strongly against role claims, they don't help town, especially if they're just random like this one was. He claims his partner didn't want him to? Why expose themselves, especially if there wasn't consensus on the team? I can't imagine how this could benefit them. The only conclusion that I can come to is that this was done to breed confusion, which is anti Town. I called for a policy lynch on this lunatical role claim, and I really think it should be that: POLICY. I feel strongly that town should get rid of role claimers unless the person claims near the end of a day period under pressure.
As for Blag and kawl, I don't know what to make of it. They say they were going to claim right at the start, that it was planned? That doesn't make much sense to me. Though there is some history to it, I think Blag claimed early his last game, and if I'm not mistaken the one before that.
One thing I do know is that Blag is smarter than he lets himself seem; he's mastered the art of looking like a fool while actually functioning at a higher level. They say it was planned? I think I believe it, but not knowing what their plan is I don't find any benefit to Town in doing it. I'd wait until tomorrow to lynch Blarg and kawl, because Flux claimed first and, as I said, Blag is entertaining. Maybe in that time they can make their own claim make sense and save themselves.
He had been set on voting Kark for some time and never really doubted that vote. He was also against the idea that they could both be town.Have to read most of what came after Blarg's two mega posts (exhausting!), but I'll place my vote on Kark. I'm of the believe that we should lynch one of the two, I agree with Blargs assessment of KarkZipped's reactioness behaviour. I don't agree with Blarg's assessment of flux as an alternative right now - it seems like the very thing he accused KarkZipped earlier in his post (I might miss remarks reagarding this from the outline - which quite frankly doesn't sit well with me. There had to be a way to not bloat your points up to a degree where reconstructing and remembering your shit is a pain - possible summarys are eh because possibly reductive of what you actually said).
VOTE: Karkador
good answer.
Would you estimate that it's a targeted effect, or something that's reactive?