Is there a reason to pick up the non-retina MBP (2012) nowadays?
I got one (MacBookPro9,1) for $1100 from the refurb store recently and I'm quite pleased with it. It's got 4GB of RAM, so the same as the 2006 MB it replaced, and a 500GB HDD. I preferred this form factor to the newer models because I can bump the RAM to 16GB later for $100, and I can also build a 2+0.25TB Fusion drive in to it for a couple hundred more.
Only Apple can sell you 2012 hardware in 2015 and charge you $1,100. Pay premium price for 3 year old hardware, then turn around and spend another $200-300 upgrading it. Makes no sense to me at all.
So, $1400, tops. Apart from moving the primary storage from SATA to PCIe, what are the significant performance improvements offered by the current, $2000 model? Seems like for $600 less, I'll have local storage that's half the speed but quintuple the capacity. In a few years, I could likely double the capacity
again for another $80-$100. With 16GB on board, once the system is warmed up, I shouldn't need to hit the disk very often, so its capacity is more important to me than its performance, especially since it's a portable device and also my primary. It doesn't matter how fast my access to inaccessible data is.
Edit: Also, mine has a 512MB 650M. Isn't that better than the Iris Pro in the $2000 book?
I wouldn't recommend buying one directly form Apple though. If you want something new, then Retina is the way to go.
Why is that? I was looking at Cowboom before I got my refurb from Apple, and by the time you added a 1-yr service plan from CB, the price was practically the same, and an Apple refurb is effectively new, so for the same price, why wouldn't I take that over used? I can even add AppleCare to mine, which wouldn't be an option with a used book.
You know they don't sell the 2012 model new anymore, right? It's just refurbs as they become available. Where do you recommend buying instead?