afternoon delight
Member
With Mel's acting and directorial support, the 5th movie should fare just as well if not better than Fury Road.
I guess most people are skipping this proposal because it's so fantastical.
With Mel's acting and directorial support, the 5th movie should fare just as well if not better than Fury Road.
For me it was a typical summer action movie popcorn flick. There wasn't anything interesting about the characters or story. It just has great visuals and action. If you went in with no expectations, you'd be satisfied, but if you went based on people's over-hype and reactions to seeing it, then you'd probably be disappointed.
Lol, what a dingleberry.
I thought it was best to ignore. Max is a symbol of legend not a character after the first movie and Hardy did a great job filling that role, it doesn't need to be tied to a specific actor.
I guess most people are skipping this proposal because it's so fantastic.
Thing that differentiate Fury Road from "typical summer action movie" off the top of my head:
- starkly original character design (as original as it gets nowadays)
- impressive performances by EVERYONE involved
- unmatched stunt work and cinematography, including almost all practical effects
- seamless and deep world building with absolutely NO expository dialog needed
- The Fucking Doof Warrior
Men In Black 3 is a typical summer action movie. RIPD is a typical action movie.Lethal Weapon 4 is a typical action movie. Fury Road is a chrome master class.
Are the original 3 films "typical summer action movies"?How was it any deeper than the world portrayed in the original 3 films?
How was it any deeper than the world portrayed in the original 3 films?
- unmatched stunt work and cinematography, including almost all practical effects
This is the worst thread I have ever seen on GAF. Blow it up.
Just watched Fury Road, and while I was very impressed by the special effects
You lost all credibility when you said Fury Road is average, OP.
Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome = CLASSIC
Mad Max: Fury Road = Average
I've watched the movie 4 times.
Not because I like it, but because I live with someone who bought the DVD and worships it, like most of the Internet.
To me, it's average.
Yup. The first film is a quirky thing that's fun but more likable for ideas than execution and will always be more important for stating the franchise than as a film. Hell you get a recap of all the good parts in two minutes at the beginning of Road Warrior.I'm of the opinion that Road Warrior and Fury Road are on a completely higher tier of quality than Mad Max or Thunderdome. And Fury Road is one of the best action movies ever made.
How was it any deeper than the world portrayed in the original 3 films?
Between this and the 10 Cloverfield Lane thing, this is schtick, ain't it?
Between this and the 10 Cloverfield Lane thing, this is schtick, ain't it?
Between this and the 10 Cloverfield Lane thing, this is schtick, ain't it?
Nothing wrong with that. People shit on Thunderdome, but it has plenty of really good and entertaining things about it. Even if one thinks its the lowest point in the Mad Max saga, it's one hell of a fun low point that I would watch again over plenty of other movies.Let's squash the Thunderdome shit for a second, because that's my personal favorite in the original trilogy.
But Fury Road also stars a main character who is equal to the series original: Furiosa. It's just as much her movie as Max's, which is reflected by the title: Mad Max: Fury Road.I've never said Bourne Legacy and Fury Road are equal in terms of quality. It's obvious which of those two movies are superior. My point is that both of those movies starred a main character that happened to be inferior to the series original.
Between this and the 10 Cloverfield Lane thing, this is schtick, ain't it?