T -11:30:00 til launch. My body is ready.
Saw it. Some fantastically shot action and some very inspired world building.
Charlize was pretty great. Hardy was okay, but hasn't got a quarter of the screen presence of Gibson.
It's not Dredd, but they earned the R rating. There's some nasty bloody stuff in the last 30 minutes.I was kind of surprised at how "light" of an R this was. It's awesome they didn't make a couple cuts to get a PG13, but on the other hand I wonder if it might have been the right call BO-wise.
I was supposed to wait till next week to watch this with a friend. Couldn't wait, too much hype. I figured if it's really good I can just watch it again.
God. Damn.
This is definitely an instant action movie classic. Everything about it is perfect for what it sets out to do. Perfect pacing, perfect framing, perfect choreography. The editing, audio, and narrative design deserve a ton of praise. This is the exactly what people are asking for when they want movies that show rather than tell. Lots of world building, lots of character development, really good foreshadowing and pay off for almost every plot point, and almost none of it required actual dialogue. Definitely one of the tightest action movies out there in terms of taking a simple concept, not bloating it up with nonsense, but filling it out with all sort of interesting motifs, larger than life characters and factions, huge set pieces, and just letting everything roll together to deliver one hell of an experience.
For a film which is basically one large chase in an open desert I was really impressed with how it was paced and divided into very conscious chapters, each with a distinct tone and color. Stuff like that go a long way in keeping a movie memorable over time. The character arcs were pretty good, and really sold the idea of survival in the wasteland, while building a unique story around on particular region of it with their own ecosystem and hierarchy. The biggest surprise was how effective the emotional pay off is for everything, even though it's a really simple story with a handful of characters. Every death and every near miss felt significant and had an impact on me. It just... worked.
Totally satisfied, definitely watching it again next week.
I know nothing about Mad Max and right now me and my gf are deciding between Mad Max or Blade Runner at the cinema.
I have seen Blade Runner before though but never in the cinema.
How is hardy as max? Everyone says Theron is great but haven't heard much about him
How is hardy as max? Everyone says Theron is great but haven't heard much about him
Apparently great, but most reviews I've seen say that he is there as a prop, Charlize Theron absolutely steals the spotlight
How is hardy as max? Everyone says Theron is great but haven't heard much about him
Gibson is a god at playing crazy so I doubt Hardy would live up to that.
The lone gunslinger, the wandering ronin, etc., etc.Prop is really the wrong word I think. The story presents Max as the "stranger" to the tale. He's the outsider caught up in this particular story. The wanderer. Like when you create a player character for a RPG and play through a game scenario - the story development is all built around characters who are part of that world. Max is a perspective for the audience and a wild card in the dynamics. He doesn't have a stake in any of it, but he's not a "prop".
Bronson begs to differ.He was good, but he's a bit more of a normal guy caught in a crazy situation. Hardy doesn't have the crazy eyes Gibson has, and he doesn't try to go out of his way to mimic that since it wouldn't be natural. Instead he plays to his strengths as a guy who is filled with loss but tries to carry on. You really can't out-Gibson Gibson, so I'm glad they didn't try.
Tom Hardy sells the sadness of the character with his eyes.
If you're Australian though you'll be bothered by his accent. It's a bizarre hybrid of American, Australian and English.
Bronson begs to differ.
But yeah, Miller probably wanted him to be a different kind of Max.
This is starting to feel like another Gravity to me; something that wasn't tracking too high until the screening impressions and reviews came out. Considering how well Gravity did...
Completely agree with you.
Bronson begs to differ.
But yeah, Miller probably wanted him to be a different kind of Max.
Now, mind you, there are a few differences. Fury Road's budget is higher, it's a low R while Gravity was a real high PG-13, Gravity was almost all 3D, etc.
But they're both Warner, and they like taking chances. Edge of Tomorrow, American Sniper, Fury Road..they're not scared of trying some crazy shit out. They're my favorite studio at the moment for stuff like this
Now, mind you, there are a few differences. Fury Road's budget is higher, it's a low R while Gravity was a real high PG-13, Gravity was almost all 3D, etc.
But they're both Warner, and they like taking chances. Edge of Tomorrow, American Sniper, Fury Road..they're not scared of trying some crazy shit out. They're my favorite studio at the moment for stuff like this
This is starting to feel like another Gravity to me; something that wasn't tracking too high until the screening impressions and reviews came out. Considering how well Gravity did...
Oh, and I think this movie gets the coveted Seal of Approval by Absolutely Everybody award
Is this a continuation of the prior movies or basically a remake?
Is this a continuation of the prior movies or basically a remake?
I've seen George Miller call it a reimagining but also that in his mind it takes place after Thunderdome.Is this a continuation of the prior movies or basically a remake?
Plus they're doing some cool things with gaming as well. I don't agree/like everything they do but WB is delivering on many fronts lately I feel.
It's entirely anecdotal, so I don't think it means much right now, but I went for an evening screening on opening day today here in Singapore and the cinema was practically empty. Maybe 10 people. I really hope the word of mouth keeps pushing the film, because if it doesn't seem to have a ton of opening hype for mainstream audiences.
Except Gravity is PG-13 and has lightness to it that is accessible to everyone. This is dark and crazy and I mentioned the movie's name ONLY to a co-worker and they instantly said no.
I think this movie might not do awesome at the box office based on how odd/crazy/dark it looks. I'll probably wait until Memorial Weekend to see it again but I don't have high hopes.
Also, Gravity wasn't good and this IS good.
What about Sam Worthington? or Jai Courtney?
Tom Hardy is a far, far better actor than any of the suggested replacements. Go back and watch Bronson again.
WITNESS MEEEEEEE