Wow is this awesome.Goddammit. I just tried to get this awesome Mondo poster for the movie, but it sold out within seconds of their site updating with it.
Wow is this awesome.Goddammit. I just tried to get this awesome Mondo poster for the movie, but it sold out within seconds of their site updating with it.
Thursday results
Still no Avengers results
The "mens rights activists calling for boycott" story is picking up steam, too. CNN, Hollywood Reporter, Cosmo, Guardian, Christian Science Monitor and others have all done writeups on it today.
In Looney Tunes terms, he was the RoadRunner.
Alrighty, I'm convincing my gf to see this Sunday.A large one. He's the ultimate spanner; the unknown variable that screws up the best laid plans.
The "mens rights activists calling for boycott" story is picking up steam, too. CNN, Hollywood Reporter, Cosmo, Guardian, Christian Science Monitor and others have all done writeups on it today.
Heading out now, wish me luck! I'll see you in Valhalla, brothers and sisters!
Wife walks in...
*RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE***************************************
I love my wife. Also, I have to wait until Monday to see the movie. Dammit!
It was a supporting role.
I mean, let's start with the poster which has Charlize Theron front and center while Max is masked, as he is for half the movie, and driving the vehicle in the background, which he does a lot of while firing supporting shots. Critics mention it, movie makes it clear. The only events he sets in place involveand he does so with a handful of lines. . I'm not sure how that constitutes as a "large" role.the last act
edit: I may have jumped the gun by proclaiming that it is a problem. I take that back. I just found no entertainment value out of him. in a movie this absurd, i prefer an absurd character to go along with it. I think the Jack Sparrow from the first Pirates movie is an example of this.
?!
He was a side character at best. A spanner, yes; but I'm not sure how he categorizes as a a large role.
Max was one of the movie's biggest problems
Any sex and or titties in this?
A masterclass of filmmaking -- one of the best movies I've ever seen. Beautiful, action-packed, emotional, strange, terrifying, and absolutely fucking badass. Cannot wait to go see it again.
. in a movie this absurd, i prefer an absurd character to go along with it. I think the Jack Sparrow from the first Pirates movie is an example of this.
I guess that David Edwards from The Mirror who gave the first rotten review isn't happy with all the praise, so he decided to write another negative review!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/mad-max-fury-road-review-5699340
I guess that David Edwards from The Mirror who gave the first rotten review isn't happy with all the praise, so he decided to write another negative review!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/mad-max-fury-road-review-5699340
For those that have seen it in 3D: is it worth it? I have tickets to it again on Sunday (in 2D), but am considering going to a 3D screening if it's worthwhile.
Didn't add anything in my opinion. With the exception ofFor those that have seen it in 3D: is it worth it? I have tickets to it again on Sunday (in 2D), but am considering going to a 3D screening if it's worthwhile.
For those that have seen it in 3D: is it worth it? I have tickets to it again on Sunday (in 2D), but am considering going to a 3D screening if it's worthwhile.
This comes off as extremely petty. Either that or he's doing it for hits.I guess that David Edwards from The Mirror who gave the first rotten review isn't happy with all the praise, so he decided to write another negative review!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/mad-max-fury-road-review-5699340
I liked it. A few shots worked great in 3D and even though it was post-converted Miller had 3D in mind when making the film.
And the little bit of 3D I've seen is pretty damned awesome, I've got to say, because when we were shooting 2D and we took no consideration at all for a 3D post. So we gave them hell. And George didn't want to give them anything. He said. "No, no, what we shoot is what we shoot for 2D and they'll have to look after themselves."
I think it added a lot to the visual effects budget because George doesn't worry about dust in the foreground, whereas if you're going for a 3D post, they don't want it there. They'd rather put it in later. For George, "No, we're shooting 2D first and that's it. Dust goes in."
This comes off as extremely petty. Either that or he's doing it for hits.
I guess that David Edwards from The Mirror who gave the first rotten review isn't happy with all the praise, so he decided to write another negative review!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/mad-max-fury-road-review-5699340
I'm not so sure Miller had 3D in mind when shooting. Initially that was the plan when they were going to shoot on their own custom 3D cameras, but that was scrapped. In this interview with cinematographer John Seale he makes it sound like they swung hard away from 3D to 2D:
I guess that David Edwards from The Mirror who gave the first rotten review isn't happy with all the praise, so he decided to write another negative review!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/mad-max-fury-road-review-5699340
For those that have seen it in 3D: is it worth it? I have tickets to it again on Sunday (in 2D), but am considering going to a 3D screening if it's worthwhile.