This isn't a particularly crazy expansion of Red's color pie, guys.
You have to discard your hand to get one card. It's the same bullshit as Avaricious Dragon.
No it's not. That dragon makes you discard you hand in the hope that the second trigger ever happens. Chandra guarantees you to draw the cards if you discard your hand.This isn't a particularly crazy expansion of Red's color pie, guys.
You have to discard your hand to get one card. It's the same bullshit as Avaricious Dragon.
you don't think there's a possible downside to discarding your hand?
okay, then what about sarkhan the dragonspeaker emblem?
I think people just really, really, really want a completely obvious variant on looting and/or shitty red card draw to be OMG EXPANSION OF RED to the point that no reasonable logic is going to get through (despite the fact that discarding your hand and getting the same number of cards is completely unplayable jank). I can already tell Maro is going to get this question and give the exact same answer - it's just a looting variant, there's nothing in the color pie that prevents you from getting more cards than you lose if you pay enough. It's not like, cards like, Reforge the Soul was printed so long ago to actually believe this kind of effect isn't a Red thing.
Normally, red is fourth when it comes to card drawing (ahead of only white). We let red have looting and Winds of Change–style cards, but neither of these gain card advantage. We do the impulsive drawing (see above), which can allow card advantage, but has a small window of opportunity.
Normally it doesnt. WoF effects have needed the buff for an eternity because they have been card disadvantage, not parity.But MaRo has said that red isn't supposed to get card advantage with its looting. That's even why discarding was part of the cost and not the effect, so you couldn't draw a card off an empty hand. Also remember that he's opposed to "discard hand, draw seven cards" effects in red.
Normally it doesnt. WoF effects have needed the buff for an eternity because they have been card disadvantage, not parity.
Ravnica and Time Spiral are cool. The rest is absolute garbage.
So only three blocks worth drafting then?They're doing all of them, they just don't want to specify when SOI's second set and the fall set come out. The idea is that you can experience every draft format in Modern in order including the evolution of specific draft formats as new sets come out.
So only three blocks worth drafting then?
3xLorwyn, meh. Shadowmoor was alright.
Almost month of Time Spiral drafts? And then triple Lorwyn? I know what I'm saving my money for.
2/24/2016 to 3/2/2016 - 2x Champions of Kamigawa, 1x Betrayers of Kamigawa
Ravnica and Time Spiral are cool. The rest is absolute garbage.
Holy balls is SaffronOlive's new article nonsense
Hey, my favorite limited format ever happens the week of my birthday!
Now I know what these 60 tickets from Mishra's Bauble are going towards!
This is a terrible opinion.
I don't know who that is.
I don't know who that is.
IDK, this is really cool. Complaining that they don't just run your pet format all of the time is just kind of being a negative nancy.
Hey, my favorite limited format ever happens the week of my birthday!
I feel like the 6th color is going to be the big thing for the 25th anniversary year.
magmapriest asked: Why wasn't Wastes given a basic land type?
Because we didnt want to have to teach beginners that Magic had six basic land types ten years from now when Oath of Gatewatch was a thing from the distant past.
trifas asked: Will Domain ever go to 6 or is Wastes the last chapter in Barry's Land story?
Weve chosen the costs to get Domain to 6 isnt worth the impact it would have on the game and in tournaments.
Actual link to the article. I wonder if he knows that MaRo confirmed on Blogatog that colorless mana costs are only going to be in this set, and while it is possible for it to show up later, it's going to show up less often than hybrid mana. And he can't seem to get that generic mana only applies to costs, just like hybrid.
Also, he brings up Basalt Monolith losing the symmetry of adding (3) and having an activated ability for (3), but that seems like a good example of where a new player can get tripped up, as MaRo has claimed. Can the (3) only be paid for by (3)?
Patrick Sullivan is taking a job at Activision (I'd presume working w/ Hearthstone in some capacity), will be doing very limited commentary next year for SCG: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWPPoYDU8AABmgj.png:large
I feel like the 6th color is going to be the big thing for the 25th anniversary year.