I regularly beat Blood Moon with my Tron deck. It's often just a speed bump until I can get Karn or O Stone online.Let me tell you about turning all their Ancient Tombs into White Boardered Mountains
I regularly beat Blood Moon with my Tron deck. It's often just a speed bump until I can get Karn or O Stone online.Let me tell you about turning all their Ancient Tombs into White Boardered Mountains
I regularly beat Blood Moon with my Tron deck. It's often just a speed bump until I can get Karn or O Stone online.
Because while people complain about cheating things into play, they also love it.
What pro says that standard is better to play than modern right now? Modern is in a great spot right now tbh. Standard comes down to: Mardu vehicles, 50 shades of GB, or Saheeli. There are some minor control decks/SUPER small varaints within those archetypes at the highest level. I really don't see how that's better than modern.The problem with the combo isn't that its simply too good to exist in a Constructed environment, its that it actively leads to a poor gameplay experience and warps the entire metagame around it. The combo's existence will continue to warp the meta around it until goes away, even if its not the best deck at any given time.
Pushing Standard is fine, but I think they're making some highly questionable timing decisions. You need to make sure Standard is in a good, healthy place before you start scaling back other events in favor of that format.
Modern is fun to play with, but I kind of agree with the pros that I think its almost always worse than Standard and Limited. It's fun to do nutty shit, but its probably literally impossible to craft a format with that many sets in it and have it be anything close to reasonably balanced.
I think Modern is a much more interesting casual format than competitive format.
Man, I'll never get over blood moon's current price. I remember getting that thing in chronicles packs in the 90s and thinking it was 5 cent chaff.
Against regular (GR/GW/GB) Tron, Blood Moon is only good if it's coupled with pressure on the board. Against Eldrazi Tron it's much better since they need colourless mana for most of their creatures.
This is fair. I didn't consider how important it would be in the Eldrazi variant. They play some number of Wastes though, right?
Against regular (GR/GW/GB) Tron, Blood Moon is only good if it's coupled with pressure on the board. Against Eldrazi Tron it's much better since they need colourless mana for most of their creatures.
This is fair. I didn't consider how important it would be in the Eldrazi variant. They play some number of Wastes though, right?
They can also use Drowner of Sorrow tokens to make colorless mana, but usually a turn 2 or 3 Blood Moon just locks them out of the game. It's the one card i've never cut from my Affinity SB at any point
Got some small blemishes still. Waiting on my FNM Nekusars next, have 2 oversized nekusars and a derevi left over.
After spending most of my free time testing this week, I'm down to two decks: Ad Nauseam, which is every bit as strong in the matchups I anticipated that I imagined, and, surprisingly, that random BR Pack Rats list that top 8'd a regionals last weekend. Decklist is here: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/565596#online
Blood Moon, Chalice, pressure, and hand disruption is exactly where I've wanted to be in these matchups. While I enjoyed WR Prison, Blood Moon and Chalice backed up a Goblin Rabblemaster is just brutal against tron, and the deck has the removal/hand destruction necessary to put in work against midrange and control as well.
AN feels like the better pick, but the Pack Rat list is pretty tempting.
Why is Chalice of the Void spiking so hard?
Modern cheerios. It's one of the better answers people have for it now and there are some bigger modern events coming up soon. It's also still now a good answer to the deck.
Is the deck tracking to be so good you need hate for it? I guess Chalice is sort of good in multiple spots too.
Is the deck tracking to be so good you need hate for it? I guess Chalice is sort of good in multiple spots too.
I put a build of it together over a year ago. Love that I got those cards for so little and now they're more valuable. Such a good feeling to occasionally get out ahead of something.No, but it's a new deck that didn't really exist beforehand that was dirt cheap to put together if you owned Mox Opals (I got my Retracts for $2 and Paladins for $5 less than a month ago)
Is there anything in the rules about "giving information away" at the start of a match, even if that info is false? Like, say you accidentally let it slip you're playing Cheerios, but you're really playing Eldrazi Tron. Is that against the rules? I mean, it's fucked up, and you shouldn't because you'd be a dick, but there isn't a rule against it, right? Not going to do this, just curious.
I put a build of it together over a year ago. Love that I got those cards for so little and now they're more valuable. Such a good feeling to occasionally get out ahead of something.
I'm pretty sure you can say whatever you want- like sit down to a round and say "yeah, had a long break because I went off on Turn 3 in both games last round" or something even if you are playing Jund, but you aren't allowed to put your deckbox on the table, open it with something like Scapeshift as the front-facing card, and then pull out of the box and shuffle up your Affinity deck with no Scapeshift in it's 75
What the heck was it at previoiusly? (I'm so glad I have playsets of pretty much everything already)
What the heck was it at previoiusly? (I'm so glad I have playsets of pretty much everything already)
.I don't understand how modern remains popular at these prices and constant spikes. On the other hand Standard sucks and EDH is a casual format so there's nothing really out there competing with it.
I don't understand how modern remains popular at these prices and constant spikes
I don't understand how modern remains popular at these prices and constant spikes. On the other hand Standard sucks and EDH is a casual format so there's nothing really out there competing with it.
With non-foil Chalices that high I'm tempted to sell mine off. It has a fair shot of being reprinted in Modern Masters next month. But if it's not.....gonna shoot through the roof.
ID: I'm still not a fan of engineering these two-card combos. I hope FFL is doing its diligence making sure this isn't a problem with anything else and thinking about what it precludes going forward.
I don't understand how modern remains popular at these prices and constant spikes. On the other hand Standard sucks and EDH is a casual format so there's nothing really out there competing with it.
M-Files - Aether Revolt part 2
Well, at least the Crackdown Construct + Wandering Fumarole combo was intentional. But lol at this quote.
It wouldn't be much of a problem if decks cost ~$200 instead of $1000+.The problem with the format is not the damn prices. Prices were there right from day one. It's the fear of buying a new deck and then seeing the deck get taken apart by bans shortly after.
But look at the last year or two. The modern meta has shifted dramatically, many decks have gone in and out of favour.
Which would be easier if Wizards gave us more reprints-serum Visions should have never been $10,same goes for literally every other $5+ Common/Uncommon.It wouldn't be much of a problem if decks cost ~$200 instead of $1000+.
It's not like Chalice of the Void or whatever was this bad obscure card that nobody ever had a reason to have a playset of before.
It wouldn't be much of a problem if decks cost ~$200 instead of $1000+.
Why is Chalice of the Void spiking so hard?
Does modern live on a playerbase that has been playing for long enough to just have all the cards lying around until they become relevant again?
It was also obscure enough of a card that it caught people off guard at the Eldrazi PT.
That's one explicit purpose of the format and enough of the playerbase to keep the format alive, at least. That's basically the key difference between Modern and Legacy: effectively nobody has Legacy cards "lying around," while enough people have the Modern equivalent to help keep the format running.
For Modern yes, but it was played many times in many formats in the preceding decade, well before the price spiked.