The new pw art are pretty ugly imo lol.
There's a lack of motion to them as well. It looks more like they are posing than mid combat.Yeah, the downward camera angle and apprehensive facial expressions are good flavor for Archenemy, but it doesn't make them very appealing to use in other contexts.
I feel like the text accompanying those decks in no way fits the actual decks.
"With no Black and only half a Blue deck, Gideon has to bring white's most powerful control options..."
Oh, so it's going to be a ton of white exile/prison effects? Nope, all creatures, and not even O-Ring on a Stick creatures. Well, uh... okay?
I feel like the text accompanying those decks in no way fits the actual decks.
"With no Black and only half a Blue deck, Gideon has to bring white's most powerful control options..."
Oh, so it's going to be a ton of white exile/prison effects? Nope, all creatures, and not even O-Ring on a Stick creatures. Well, uh... okay?
the highlight are reprints of a couple talismans.
fuck. yes.
Give us Unraveled, MaRo!
Food $200
Data $150
Rent $800
Magic cards $3,600
Utility $150
someone who is good at the economy please help me budget this. my family is dying
Maro wrote a very in-depth article about mechanics and where they fit on the colour pie:
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/mechanical-color-pie-2017-2017-06-05
He's also teasing something big for next monday (announcement day hopefully).
Kamigawa really is underappreciated.There's a lot in there. I haven't read through all of it, but I did look through red. There's a lot of stuff in there that straight isn't represented in cards yet so I can only assume its future set stuff? Like red having permanent edicts. As in 'target player sacrifices a permanent' is apparently in red. Unless there's a hidden rider in there that says that it has to also be a random sacrifice to be bad and therefor red.
There's a lot in there. I haven't read through all of it, but I did look through red. There's a lot of stuff in there that straight isn't represented in cards yet so I can only assume its future set stuff? Like red having permanent edicts. As in 'target player sacrifices a permanent' is apparently in red. Unless there's a hidden rider in there that says that it has to also be a random sacrifice to be bad and therefor red.
he doesn't mean impulsive draw with this.MaRo on primary red said:Playing cards off top of library, for free
It's primary on red for spells, green for critters, and they print it on more critters than spells.can't be countered is certainly not primary red. It goes green > red > blue
There's a lot in there. I haven't read through all of it, but I did look through red. There's a lot of stuff in there that straight isn't represented in cards yet so I can only assume its future set stuff? Like red having permanent edicts. As in 'target player sacrifices a permanent' is apparently in red. Unless there's a hidden rider in there that says that it has to also be a random sacrifice to be bad and therefor red.
Bolas himself looks good. The rest? They looked scrunched up.The new pw art are pretty ugly imo lol.
makes sense. MaRo should clarify that.It's primary on red for spells, green for critters, and they print it on more critters than spells.
Bolas himself looks good. The rest? They looked scrunched up.
If Maro wants to do another Un-set, he should do just 100 ish cards or so and insert them in the token slot of normal boosters. (Although I really want some fancy new lands)
Numbers don't stop people like this.I want a new Unset for two reasons only:
1. New cool lands
2. For the numbers to prove without a doubt another one never need be made
Give me anything but Un-set 3, they are terrible.
This is actually a Matt Tabak quote, which shows you why this is actually never going to happen.To quote kirblar, why would you make an un-set when you could make literally anything else?
It isn't going to be an unset. He said on his blog last week it would be an article about core sets.
He said recently he's pretty sure he'll get one
Yes but someone last week asked a core set question and he specifically said that his article on the 12th would cover the subject.