Present the evidence then? Who fired the rocket and where it was supplied from please?
Russian troops fired the rocket and it came from Russia.
Present the evidence then? Who fired the rocket and where it was supplied from please?
Russian troops fired the rocket and it came from Russia.
It's good to be a skeptic about things.
It's not good to pretend to be so skeptical that mountains of already supported evidence pointing in one clear, stark direction is casually glanced over as if the whole purpose is to try to find some ever more illogical explanation for why all that evidence might somehow just maybe not be real because reasons
Present the evidence then? Who fired the rocket and where it was supplied from please?
Who is responsible for the gaza strip being a warzone? If a plane is shot down over the region do we blame the British? The Americans if one is shot down over rebels supplied in Syria?
Unless you're suggesting that people from unknown origins managed to sneak into Rebel-controlled territory with a mobile SAM, with clear knowledge of how to operate such machinery, and shot down a flying object in the sky whilst disappearing into thin air... what exactly are you suggesting here?
At this point European Officials probably need to meet on how to deal with Russia. Putin has total control over what's going on at that crash site. If people want to believe he doesn't that is fine but they are just showing their naivety.
Problem is that Donetsk is under Russian control. You can not agree with me or whatever, it this is fact. They got weapon and supplies from Russia. They got money to be there. Yes of course there is locals who want to play "game" or think this must be Russia land.
I wonder what would happen if Ukraine forces moved against the pro-Russian separatists. What would Russia do then.
Im asking for evidence that Russia, not rebels, shot down a plane and is hampering investigators from getting into the crash site as per this post:
I wonder what would happen if Ukraine forces moved against the pro-Russian separatists. What would Russia do then.
Im asking for evidence that Russia, not rebels, shot down a plane and is hampering investigators from getting into the crash site as per this post:
The war has slowly been moving towards an end. Ukraine has been pushing them back more and more everyday. "Rebels" are basically left in 2 major cities and one of those cities is on the brink of being liberated.
Russia has simply been doing all it can to make it go as long and as bloody as possible. The constant flow of weapons and soldiers was the only thing keeping it going. Now we wait and see if Russia will truly stop
That's just playing semantics. It is accepted fact that the rebels are a Russian proxy. They have Russian equipment, Russians in positions of power, Russians advisors on the ground...
Bandit from the Donetsk People's Republic (Ukraine)--- ordering experts from the search area
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cS3vVKdB958&feature=youtu.be
I genuinely think Russia would do nothing right now. This is too sensitive. But it would be an interesting gamble. Not sure as a leader I'd know what to do.
I imagine they would be very reluctant to commit ukraine forces close to the russian border, which they would have to do to cut the rebels off.I wonder what would happen if Ukraine forces moved against the pro-Russian separatists. What would Russia do then.
I think you're being a little too naive trying to hammer home your point that there isn't 100% refutable evidence that Russia has ties to Pro-Russian separatists. Has Russia even condemned them for their actions? At all?
I imagine they would be very reluctant to commit ukraine forces close to the russian border, which they would have to do to cut the rebels off.
No, you keep being obtuse. People answer you, but that's not good enough for you.I'm not being naive at all I'm asking how the people calling for further sanctions and action against Russia will justify it. So far the people proposing such action are ignoring it.
No, you keep being obtuse. People answer you, but that's not good enough for you.
Where is the evidence then? Link me to it if I missed it?
It's all around you open your eyes.
The burden of proof is on you good sir. That's how this works, you don't believe me, do some research. I'm not here to link you anything, and you would likely dismiss it anyway.Where is the evidence then? Link me to it if I missed it?
Where they got the BUK isn't as important as the fact that pro Russian rebels shot down a civilian aircraft with it. It's more, how you use it, than where you got it, at this point.
I agree except for the remembering part. If their training is anything like ours, they remember. I can still shoot down an aircraft, either using an Avenger or shoulder fired, and its been quite a while.
I saw what you posted and it can hardly be called evidence, sorry.
I saw what you posted and it can hardly be called evidence, sorry.
So he does want selfies after all.I saw what you posted and it can hardly be called evidence, sorry.
Anger towards Russia grows over MH17 crash
Yeah so level headed.How about a fine, level-headed article. I'm sure it will be unpopular here, but here it is anyways:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-01-190714.html
And here's the spin war verdict: the current Malaysia Airlines tragedy - the second in four months - is "terrorism" perpetrated by "pro-Russian separatists", armed by Russia, and Vladimir Putin is the main culprit. End of story. Anyone who believes otherwise, shut up.
Why? Because the CIA said so. Because Hillary "We came, we saw, he died" Clinton said so. Because batshit crazy Samantha "R2P" Power said so - thundering at the UN, everything duly printed by the neo-con infested Washington Post. [1]
Because Anglo-American corporate media - from CNN to Fox (who tried to buy Time Warner, which owns CNN) - said so. Because the President of the United States (POTUS) said so. And mostly because Kiev had vociferously said so in the first place.
Right off the bat they were all lined up - the invariably hysterical reams of "experts" of the "US intelligence community" literally foaming at their palatial mouths at "evil" Russia and "evil" Putin; intel "experts" who could not identify a convoy of gleaming white Toyotas crossing the Iraqi desert to take Mosul. And yet they have already sentenced they don't need to look any further, instantly solving the MH17 riddle.
Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said those responsible must be brought to justice at an international court.
We are seeking justice and I reiterate the statement by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak that there must be an investigation into this tragedy by an independent and credible body. This is a heinous crime.
This tragedy should not have happened because the airplane was flying along a route used by many airlines and declared safe.
In Sepang, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai said Malaysia was calling on all international parties to protect the integrity of the MH17 crash site to facilitate investigations, and urged all those involved to respect the families and the nations who had lost their citizens in the incident.
He said Malaysia was deeply concerned that the crash site had not been properly secured and had been compromised.
Pretty much. Everyone knows exactly what happened before the investigation even occurs. Western press and US officials blaming Russia immediately, as if US has any credibility. I expected better from GAF but people here really hate Russia (although I understand that where some folks of from, they may have significant historical reasons to perhaps). But still, this is madness. Can we at least have an investigation first?Not really but some GAF posters have decided Russia is guilty and should be invaded and are currently drawing up plans.
How about a fine, level-headed article. I'm sure it will be unpopular here, but here it is anyways:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-01-190714.html
Unlike Washington - who already knows everything, with no evidence whatsoever (remember 9/11?) - Moscow will take its time to know the basic journalistic facts of what, where, and who, and engage on proving the truth and/or disproving Washington's spin
The burden of proof is on you good sir. That's how this works, you don't believe me, do some research. I'm not here to link you anything, and you would likely dismiss it anyway.
You'd be amazing in a jury.
How about a fine, level-headed article. I'm sure it will be unpopular here, but here it is anyways:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-01-190714.html
Right off the bat they were all lined up - the invariably hysterical reams of "experts" of the "US intelligence community" literally foaming at their palatial mouths at "evil" Russia and "evil" Putin; intel "experts" who could not identify a convoy of gleaming white Toyotas crossing the Iraqi desert to take Mosul.
The burden of proof is on me to prove Putin is stopping people investigating the wreckage, has full control over the area and therefore governments should get together and impose tougher sanctions?
Please...
PS: Apologies to anyone who quotes me in the next while Its sunday afternoon here and I have to go out for a bit.
I'm not being naive at all I'm asking how the people calling for further sanctions and action against Russia will justify it. So far the people proposing such action are ignoring it. Thta's fine on their part to ignore it and continue posting unfounded propaganda but you also should be clever enough to see that's happening.
How about a fine, level-headed article. I'm sure it will be unpopular here, but here it is anyways:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-01-190714.html
tymoshenko gives no fuckshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DE7DujxLzsg (stereo with each person on either side) - Timoshenko has confirmed this one to be true (but cut in such a way as to put her out of context).
The burden of proof is on me to prove Putin is stopping people investigating the wreckage, has full control over the area and therefore governments should get together and impose tougher sanctions?
Please...
PS: Apologies to anyone who quotes me in the next while Its sunday afternoon here and I have to go out for a bit.
I knew you all would shoot down the Asia Times article I posted for not following the GAF narrative!