• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 ended in the Southern Indian Ocean

Status
Not open for further replies.

Imm0rt4l

Member
Flipped on Fox News, saw "PILOTS SOCIAL MEDIA EXPOSES INTEREST IN ATHEISM", flipped off Fox News.

I like how it's interest in atheism and not disinterest in whatever his faith was(likely muslim). I'm not even sure what that headline is supposed to imply. He was a Godless heathen?
 

Oersted

Member
Exactly. Damn you American media for propagating conspiracy where THERE IS NONE.

I mean who gives a shit about all those people mourning for the loss of their loved ones right?

Based on the cams stuffed into their faces, they know. They know really well.
 

Bsigg12

Member
I have never seen media failing so much. Its embarassing. Speculations after speculations, barely any fact reporting.

If there were facts to report then we would get around to them. As it stands we are still stuck on the who knows fuck all what happened to it and what the hell did they see in the satellite images. Problem is, they can't not talk about it otherwise they'll be labeled that it doesn't matter to them so they have to bring something even if it is speculation.
 

MGR

Member
RZDh9up.jpg
 
There are a few things I found really interesting so far:

- The flight information shown on the youtube video I posted earlier.

- The second video posted by the same person that talked about the data being removed from the site he got it from. Although the site claimed it removed the data because it didn't match or make sense. I forgot which.


- This quote:

Investigators also extracted performance data from the Rolls Royce engines used on the Boeing 777 that suggested it lost 40,000 feet
within a minute,
but have discounted the information as the rate of descent was improbable.
One aviation specialist told the NYT that the erratic changes in altitude suggested it was pilot-induced rather than mechanical.
“It is extremely difficult for an aircraft to physically, however heavy it might be, to free fall,” Cengiz Turkoglu, a senior lecturer in
aeronautical engineering at City University London who specialises in aviation safety, told the US daily.

- And the information that was released about the seismic event

Which leads me to a question for anyone that can answer....

How fast would the plane have to be traveling for it to actually descend ~40,000 in a minute if it could? Also, if the plane were somehow completely and suddenly displaced (not saying it was), what would happen to the force generated by the plane? Would it be cut off immediately or would that force still impact the area under the plane?

Btw, my apologies to any and everyone affected by this event. I realized a few people here are dealing with lost family...etc. So i'm sorry if any of the jokes I made here (about the machines or whatever) offended any of you.

And yesss, yesss, I know they "debunked" it!


Occam's razor is getting pretty blunt.

We're going to need to take a trip to Home Depo at this point.
 

toxicgonzo

Taxes?! Isn't this the line for Metallica?
Someone on reddit calculated the plane would only have to be flying an average of 450mph to do that. So mathematically it checks out, but with respect to physics....

To pull out of a nose dive like that would put huge stresses on the airplane. Civilian aircraft is not designed to do that. Would it break up? Hard to say, but the if plane exceeded its designed stress loads, much testing would have to be done to see if the plane is still airworthy.
 

BunnyBear

Member

Oh for fuck's sake.

Fairfax Media is reporting that it wasn't Australian authorities who located the possible debris, but instead US satellite imagery. Australia didn't admit this because they didnt want America being angry at them for revealing the extent of their surveillance capabilities.
 
Someone on reddit calculated the plane would only have to be flying an average of 450mph to do that. So mathematically it checks out, but with respect to physics....

To pull out of a nose dive like that would put huge stresses on the airplane. Civilian aircraft is not designed to do that. Would it break up? Hard to say, but the if plane exceeded its designed stress loads, much testing would have to be done to see if the plane is still airworthy.

Very interesting. Especially since they can't seem to find any debris.
 

numble

Member
http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Mal...-and-Nicobar-Islands/articleshow/32374611.cms

NEW DELHI: India has declined China's proposal to allow four of its warships to join the hunt for the MH370 jetliner near the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, even as it is now dispatching two aircraft to Malaysia to join the international search force that is now scanning southern Indian Ocean off Australia for the missing 777-200ER aircraft.

Officials on Thursday said China's request to allow its four warships, including two frigates and a salvage vessel, to enter Indian territorial waters has been "politely turned down" since Indian warships and aircraft are already searching the Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea around the 572-island cluster.
While the Chinese warships are free to sail in international waters, Indian forces will obviously be unhappy about their presence anywhere near the strategically-located Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

"The A&N command is our military outpost in the region, which overlooks the Malacca Strait and dominates the Six-Degree Channel. We don't want Chinese warships sniffing around in the area on the pretext of hunting for the missing jetliner or anti-piracy patrols," said an official.

...
 

HoosTrax

Member
Fairfax Media is reporting that it wasn't Australian authorities who located the possible debris, but instead US satellite imagery. Australia didn't admit this because they didnt want America being angry at them for revealing the extent of their surveillance capabilities.
Ehhh...

WorldView-2, owned by US satellite company DigitalGlobe, provides imagery at a resolution of approximately 50 cm. It takes a new image of any place on earth every 1.1 days (1 day, 2 hours and 24 minutes), writes deputy technology editor Ben Grubb.
DigitalGlobe confirmed on Friday that it was the one who provided the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) with the satellite images that were captured on March 16, showing the two objects in the Indian Ocean.
“We have been informed by an Australian government official that it was our imagery Prime Minister Abbott referred to in his recent comments,” the company said in a statement.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-...plane-mh370-20140321-356k3.html#ixzz2wYjtVBJP
 

Ty4on

Member
Someone on reddit calculated the plane would only have to be flying an average of 450mph to do that. So mathematically it checks out, but with respect to physics....

To pull out of a nose dive like that would put huge stresses on the airplane. Civilian aircraft is not designed to do that. Would it break up? Hard to say, but the if plane exceeded its designed stress loads, much testing would have to be done to see if the plane is still airworthy.
In silk air the tailfin broke off during the fall. It's important to remember that the cruising speed is much higher than maximum airspeed because the air is much thinner at cruising altitude. Planes have vertical speed indicators in feet per minute that pretty much never go above 5000 AFAIK. 40000 (average!) is absurdly high.

ACARS is a data transmission system, SATCOM is the plane's satellite radio. ACARS can use SATCOM like an iPhone's Message App can use LTE or Wi-Fi to send texts and photos. The pings have nothing to do with ACARS, but were sent from a satellite and replied by SATCOM.
I read somewhere that it was the ACARS as I was writing the post while looking for another source. I was going to write it was a different system and thought I dodged looking stupid :p
 

DrSlek

Member
That Perth fail. Don't they research first?

One would imagine that the first result for Perth on Google would be either in Western Australia, or Perth in England. There is a Perth in Tasmania, but I have no clue how anybody could have brought up that search result and missed the other 2.

Fun fact: There's also a Bagdad in Tasmania.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
For those of you not familiar with Australian's cities, the typo is not the only thing wrong with this image.

What network is this on?

This Island Perth - best sci fi movie ever.

Until Willbur Smith's amazing line in Colonial Independence Day, "Welcome ta Perf"
 

dejay

Banned
One would imagine that the first result for Perth on Google would be either in Western Australia, or Perth in England. There is a Perth in Tasmania, but I have no clue how anybody could have brought up that search result and missed the other 2.

Fun fact: There's also a Bagdad in Tasmania.

I think there's a Perth in Canada too (fake edit - yup). You'd think one Perth would be enough. I think there's a Bagdad or two in the US.
 

hom3land

Member
I think there's a Perth in Canada too (fake edit - yup). You'd think one Perth would be enough. I think there's a Bagdad or two in the US.


There's a town in North Carolina called Carthage.. Who names their town after a city burned, raped, and covered in Salt so nothing would grow again?
 
Wow went to sleep and we were on the western side of the country, all of a sudden our whole city is now in tasmania.

This truly is an episode of lost.
 
069995-67479d62-b089-11e3-9d7e-f018f46e0213.jpg


South Pacific Ocean has now also been replaced by the coral sea but at least perth has warped back to its correct position.

EDIT : Mind you just looking at google earth and bing they also refer to it has the coral sea. Guess it depends on which image you use

australia-map-political.png
 

BunnyBear

Member
Anyone else got the hunch this will probably lead to nothing? Just seems too vague and unbelievable to believe it could be found so far away, and I remain unconvinced by the imagery thus far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom