MMBosstones86
Member
There are plenty of cop cars and buses with cameras in it.
Are you talking about dash cams? Because that is not exactly the same thing as a camera in the cockpit pointing at the pilots.
There are plenty of cop cars and buses with cameras in it.
you're right, but talk about suicide as a cause usually doesn't involve "him" just sitting there, not worrying about the 237 people on the other side of that door, because it's been covered before that the cabin crew can gain access to the cockpit.Again, we don't know if there was a climb or not. That evidence is not reliable.
Are you talking about dash cams? Because that is not exactly the same thing as a camera in the cockpit pointing at the pilots.
Tankers aren't only used for fighter jets.Can those fuel the search jets? Fighter jets aren't very good for search and rescue
Glad to see CNN scraping the bottom of the barrel as usual. First, a black hole as a possible culprit, and now bringing on psychics?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/i-tend-to-work-off-what-i-dont-know-hln-asks-psychic-to-investigate-missing-plane/
Apparently, according to this psychic, at least some of the passengers are still alive. Too bad the families can't sue the shit out of her after they find the wreckage - there's no way that the passengers (or the plane) are OK at this point, sadly. And shame on CNN for giving this kind of bullshit the time of day - I'd expect this little journalistic integrity from Fox News, but not from anybody else.
I stopped watching their coverage a little over a week ago.Glad to see CNN scraping the bottom of the barrel as usual. First, a black hole as a possible culprit, and now bringing on psychics?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/i-tend-to-work-off-what-i-dont-know-hln-asks-psychic-to-investigate-missing-plane/
Apparently, according to this psychic, at least some of the passengers are still alive. Too bad the families can't sue the shit out of her after they find the wreckage - there's no way that the passengers (or the plane) are OK at this point, sadly. And shame on CNN for giving this kind of bullshit the time of day - I'd expect this little journalistic integrity from Fox News, but not from anybody else.
China found debris? Hope so.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26697048
Edit: But that is the "wrong" ocean isn't it? Confused....
Edit 2: BBC have now changed it to debris "images" and Southern Indian Ocean! Even the BBC are jumping the gun.
"The news that I just received is that the Chinese ambassador received satellite image of floating objects in the southern corridor and they will be sending ships to verify."
The location is being shared...Why wouldn't they just share that data with everyone? If the debris' location is known they should just give that location and anyone nearby could check.
I assume if its anything it will float away before they get there.
"Why don't they just drain the area they are looking in?"
-Strobogo's 19 year old sister
genius, mock your sister for me
I imagine building a dam for this purpose if we were to entertain the idea would be highly costly, and environmentally dangerous.
I imagine building a dam for this purpose if we were to entertain the idea would be highly costly, and environmentally dangerous.
.
11:09: Xinhua news agency reports that the new object was detected about 120km from the site where floating debris had been spotted earlier this week.
Seems the Chinese image was taken two days after the Australian image. It's either the same debris that has drifted or could possibly be another piece of debris from the same source object. Hope they find it even if it turns out to be something else.
DEBRIS including a wooden pallet has been spotted by one of the aircraft searching for missing flight MH370, Prime Minister Tony Abbott has revealed.
Mr Abbott said he was told late last night a civilian aircraft had sighted a number of objects within the search zone.
It is the first direct sighting of debris and follows two hits by satellite in the past week.
Yesterday one of our civilian search aircraft got visuals on a number of objects in a fairly small area in the overall Australian search zone, Mr Abbott said this morning.
He said the debris was: A number of small objects, fairly close together within the Australian search zone, including a wooden pallet.
Its still too early to be definite, but obviously we have now had a number of very credible leads and there is increasing hope, no more than hope, no more than hope, that we might be on the road to discovering what did happen to this ill-fated aircraft, Mr Abbott said.
His revelation gives further hope that authorities might be closing in on the fate of missing Malaysian aircraft MH370.
They use wooden palettes for cargo on airplanes? I thought it was specialized metal containers.
120 km, in 2 days - is that possible?Seems the Chinese image was taken two days after the Australian image. It's either the same debris that has drifted or could possibly be another piece of debris from the same source object. Hope they find it even if it turns out to be something else.
120 km, in 2 days - is that possible?
I imagine building a dam for this purpose if we were to entertain the idea would be highly costly, and environmentally dangerous.
I want to say the amount of water displacemcent required would put most of the rest of the world underwater.
thank you very much, I was aware that the oceans do not stand still. my question is whether or not these currents are strong enough move debris over a distance of 120 km in two days.it is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_current
ships use them all the time to increase speed of the boats
thank you very much, I was aware that the oceans do not stand still. my question is whether or not these currents are strong enough move debris over a distance of 120 km in two days.
thank you very much, I was aware that the oceans do not stand still. my question is whether or not these currents are strong enough move debris over a distance of 120 km in two days.
I saw a video once showing how a duck doesn't move because of waves. He just sort of floats on top of them, unmoving. But I don't think that is related to currents. Maybe he and others think something floating on top of the water isn't as affected by currents as something deeper down in the water.What would slow it down (induce drag)? The ocean?
They use wooden palettes for cargo on airplanes? I thought it was specialized metal containers.
Who's talking about slowing it down?What would slow it down (induce drag)? The ocean?
As soon as they changed their mind about when the last communication was sent, I stopped caring about updates. Unless they find the plane and/or wreckage, nothing is true and everything is possible as far as I'm concerned.At this point, who is biting on any news whatsoever until debris is completely confirmed? And I don't mean confirmation of an announcement of an announcement of a possible black dot picked up by satellite in the middle of the Arctic ocean.
Who's talking about slowing it down?
I simply asked whether or not the current down there is strong enough in the first place. Am I writing in latin?
Phone records of Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah have reportedly revealed he took a two-minute phone call from a mystery woman using a mobile phone number obtained under a false identity, The Mail Online reports.
Investigators are understood to be treating it seriously because anyone buying a pay-as-you-go SIM card in Malaysia has to fill out a form giving their identity card or passport number.
This ensures that every number is registered to a traceable person.
In investigations into the captains life, police are believed to have traced the number to a shop selling SIM cards in Kuala Lumpur.
It was bought very recently by someone who gave a womans name but was using a false identity.
I certainly wouldn't bite on a black dot picked up by satellite in the middle of the Arctic Ocean.At this point, who is biting on any news whatsoever until debris is completely confirmed? And I don't mean confirmation of an announcement of an announcement of a possible black dot picked up by satellite in the middle of the Arctic ocean.
Seems like we can expect the first debris to be picked up within a day or two. They are zooming in on them. Whether those debris are related to the airplane or not is up in the air.
They mentioned strapping belts being seen, whatever that means.
At this point, who is biting on any news whatsoever until debris is completely confirmed? And I don't mean confirmation of an announcement of an announcement of a possible black dot picked up by satellite in the middle of the Arctic ocean.