At this point just say Aliens.
why is it possible to turn off the transponder?
does it use a lot of power?
You can turn off everything on an aircraft in case they're starting to ignite.
Also airports would be swamped by transponder messages if they didn't turn them off.
You can turn off everything on an aircraft in case they're starting to ignite.
Also airports would be swamped by transponder messages if they didn't turn them off.
So CBC is still running with the 4hrs of extra flight time (~2500 miles) from engine data. Hasn't that been discredited already too?
So CBC is still running with the 4hrs of extra flight time (~2500 miles) from engine data. Hasn't that been discredited already too?
Malaysia said that Boeing/RR said that it was false; however, AFAIK Boeing/RR have NOT themselves publicly commented on the veracity of the claim.
They've declined to comment, but WSJ did quote an unnamed Boeing executive as saying The disappearance is officially now an accident and all information about this is strictly handled by investigators., which does imply that they have no evidence suggesting otherwise.Malaysia said that Boeing/RR said that it was false; however, AFAIK Boeing/RR have NOT themselves publicly commented on the veracity of the claim.
U.S. officials have an "indication" the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner may have crashed in the Indian Ocean and is moving the USS Kidd to the area to begin searching.
It will take another 24 hours to move the ship into position, a senior Pentagon official told ABC News.
"We have an indication the plane went down in the Indian Ocean," the senior official said.
The official said there were indications that the plane flew four or five hours after disappearing from radar and that they believe it went into the water.
Yep, Occam's razor.As always, the most logical explanation is typically the most accurate.
Rapid depressurisation and a subsequent incompetent search and rescue operation will be the most likely outcome.
If they are moving assets they must have what they would consider solid intel. If this is the case then the plane must have turned back.
Yes. That would make sense. The WSJ article seemed pretty confident.I still wonder if those reports about the engine data were more accurate than Malaysia could confirm. Technically the data belongs to the airline and neither RR nor Boeing could comment about it without permission.
I still wonder if those reports about the engine data were more accurate than Malaysia could confirm. Technically the data belongs to the airline and neither RR nor Boeing could comment about it without permission.
But the WSJ article implies the data is data that goes to Boeing not the airline.the airline is state-run
the airline is state-run
I like this theory.I'm betting the indication was a submarine on patrol in the Indian Ocean.
Once again Richard Quest proves he is the only intelligent person at CNN.
So how about they pass safety legislation for commercial planes to make it illegal (better yet) impossible to turn transponders off. What good does it do allowing the machine to be shut off? Serious question. I can't imagine any scenario where this is helpful. "I know! I'll shut off the only thing the world can track us with!"
Well first of all planes rarely go down. Second of all, if you want it to be able to transmit to a satellite you are going to need a bigger battery. You have to balance battery consumption with beacon emitting time.Not sure if this has been answered, but is there a reason why black boxes on planes don't have their own emergency beacon that can be accessed via satellite and that cannot be shut off?
Seems like a really simple solution that should be installed into every plane.
Speculation, but maybe this is why they're sending the USS Kidd to the location even though it's 24 hours away, instead of just letting the closest southeast Asian country know the location.I'm betting the indication was a submarine on patrol in the Indian Ocean.
So how about they pass safety legislation for commercial planes to make it illegal (better yet) impossible to turn transponders off. What good does it do allowing the machine to be shut off? Serious question. I can't imagine any scenario where this would be helpful in anyway. "I know! I'll shut off the only thing the world can track us with!"
Edit: saw someone's explanation above. Still, there should be a way for a control tower to send an override command to shut it back on in an emergency.
Reuters: Satellites picked up electronic ping from Malaysian flight MH370 after it lost contact with ground control: source close to investigation
Post 9/11 - If the doors to the cockpit are locked... is there anybody in the cabin crew that can gain access to it? Does the purser know the code?
Reuters: Satellites picked up electronic ping from Malaysian flight MH370 after it lost contact with ground control: source close to investigation
Any other sources? Reuters is not reliable.
So is this now the biggest air mystery since the Valentich disappearance? Thinking about that still gives me the willies. Same with that plane in the 1940s that disappereaed with a final transmission that just kept saying "stendec".
Since when?