Pentagon official says that upon preliminary analysis from Malaysian data suggests there was data transmitted from the airplane about 4 to 5 hours from the time it disappeared off of the radar.
These were engine data pings. No details but it did not suggest the plane had crashed at that point.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Pretty sad. You have to question EVERY report that comes out now.I literally don't believe any news report now. No idea what's going on.
China would never allow the NTSB into their waters.
Has anyone visited one of those conspiracy theory sites. They must be having a field day over there.
I literally don't believe any news report now. No idea what's going on.
The confusion has already been at least partly resolved, as stated earlierThe U.S. has confidence in their intel and Malaysian officials deny the engines were running. Only Rolls Royce can settle it.
The source of this information may be the satellite logs, rather than Boeing and RRHowever, the signals gave no indication about where the stray jet was heading nor its technical condition.
The "pings" equated to an indication that the aircrafts maintenance troubleshooting systems were ready to communicate with satellites if needed, but no links were opened because Malaysia Airlines and others had not subscribed to the full troubleshooting service, the source said.
The U.S. has confidence in their intel and Malaysian officials deny the engines were running. Only Rolls Royce can settle it.
This seems like a giant cluster fuck. Holy hell. At this point I really hope the flight was hijacked and everyone is alive somewhere. :/
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles...3086282.html?mod=WSJEurope_hpp_LEFTTopStoriesThe investigators believe the plane flew for a total of up to five hours, according to these people, based on analysis of signals sent by the Boeing BA -1.88% 777's satellite-communication link designed to automatically transmit the status of certain onboard systems to the ground.
Throughout the roughly four hours after the jet dropped from civilian radar screens, these people said, the link operated in a kind of standby mode and sought to establish contact with a satellite or satellites. These transmissions did not include data, they said, but the periodic contacts indicate to investigators that the plane was still intact and believed to be flying.
Investigators are still working to fully understand the information, according to one person briefed on the matter. The transmissions, this person said, were comparable to the plane "saying I'm here, I'm ready to send data."
The confusion has already been at least partly resolved, as stated earlier
The source of this information may be the satellite logs, rather than Boeing and RR
Again Rolls Royce can't say anything since the data doesn't belong to them. The only way anyone could comment about it is if it's released by the airline and probably then the regulatory agencies. Informal, quick analysis is fine for directing an open investigation but it's not formal enough for public consumption.
I literally don't believe any news report now. No idea what's going on.
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/reports_aviation.html
These are the NTSB reports for every one of their investigations since 1933. The only investigations they have performed outside the US has, excluding US owned airliners, been for very minor incidents. They haven't investigated an incident on this scale for a non-US owned airliner.
Right now, the problem the Malaysian authorities have is that the incident has very much gotten political - and there is that angle where the involvement of the NTSB at this stage, where control and focus of the SAR effort has become quite frankly a shambles, may not be conducive to productivity, and may indeed hinder efforts. If the NTSB was to be involved, contrary to their past history, then it would have been in the first 24-48 hours.
That is not all of the accidents the NTSB has investigated over the years, only the ones they issued formal reports for. I regularly work with both the NTSB and the FAA on crash investigations involving smaller aircraft all over the world. They are requested(by either the country or the manufacturer, or both) in some cases for their expertise and/or because foreign regulatory agencies have agreements with the FAA and European agencies regarding reciprocity for certifications and things like that. Even if they do not issue the official document they work to coordinate the investigation because they have the experience other countries do not.
Also as a notable example Egypt requested the NTSB to run the investigation into the Egyptair incident in the late 90's. The report either isn't listed on that link or it's under MA or something since it crashed off the coast.
That is not all of the accidents the NTSB has investigated over the years, only the ones they issued formal reports for. I regularly work with both the NTSB and the FAA on crash investigations involving smaller aircraft all over the world. They are requested(by either the country or the manufacturer, or both) in some cases for their expertise and/or because foreign regulatory agencies have agreements with the FAA and European agencies regarding reciprocity for certifications and things like that. Even if they do not issue the official document they work to coordinate the investigation because they have the experience other countries do not.
Also as a notable example Egypt requested the NTSB to run the investigation into the Egyptair incident in the late 90's. The report either isn't listed on that link or it's under MA or something since it crashed off the coast.
If you don't mind me asking - what do you do?
Has anyone visited one of those conspiracy theory sites. They must be having a field day over there.
Avionics design.
Interesting. Thanks for that.
Do you think the NTSB will get involved given the politics (especially from China) and the time since the incident now then? Do you know if the Malaysian government has an agreement with the FAA (I suspect the answer the latter is no).
I think the fact that there was any sort of signal after the disappearance has been contested.Whatever sort of signal was sent to those satellites from the aircraft - doesn't there have to be general power to the aircraft to transmit the signal? And if so, wouldn't that in itself prove the aircraft was operating for the full five hours?
Pentagon officials have claimed otherwise now. Not sure. We do have confirmation that US is sending assets to the Indian Ocean. Could be another shot in the dark.I think the fact that there was any sort of signal after the disappearance has been contested.
I think the fact that there was any sort of signal after the disappearance has been contested.
Whatever sort of signal was sent to those satellites from the aircraft - doesn't there have to be general power to the aircraft to transmit the signal? And if so, wouldn't that in itself prove the aircraft was operating for the full five hours?
Also, does anyone know anymore about the oil rig worker's claims?
I wish he published at what time he saw the plane on fire... that would have helped matters!
Let us hope that aviation as a whole wakes up and actually installs soms hardware that makes it able to track these damn planes via sattelite, even when the power shuts down.
I've been thinking. Would it make sense to have a sizeable container with a bright-colored liquid in each plane that would leak after a crash? That way software could be set up to look for that specific color in satellite images.
Liquid is heavy. You want to minimize weight on aircraft.
I don't think there is any network coverage in the middle of the ocean, 35000ft or at sea level.I am surprised people didn't turn on their phones or laptops and leave messages or emails for the loved ones. I am guessing 3g works at 35,000 ft right? or 4g? Some planes even have wifi these days
My dad's flies the 777 and has done so ever since Air Canada first bought them. I asked him if he had any insight to offer based off his experience.
His response: "I think it crashed."
Thanks, dad.
I don't think there is any network coverage in the middle of the ocean, 35000ft or at sea level.
I don't think there is any network coverage in the middle of the ocean, 35000ft or at sea level.