This is what I was wondering. "Deliberate" is pretty vague.Deliberate human action can be in response to mechanical failure. That is why they are being careful not to jump to a conclusion about hijacking.
This is what I was wondering. "Deliberate" is pretty vague.Deliberate human action can be in response to mechanical failure. That is why they are being careful not to jump to a conclusion about hijacking.
I thought he handled it well. Covered everything that was confirmed and tried to calm the rampant speculation.
I can totally see this. Something goes wrong, forced to change course drastically. Although, deliberate cutting off of communication is inconsistent with this theory.Deliberate human action can be in response to mechanical failure. That is why they are being careful not to jump to a conclusion about hijacking.
I'm trying to think of a reason that they would turn the ACARS and transponders at 2 separate times. During the time between these 2 events no one from the plane said anything was wrong.Deliberate human action can be in response to mechanical failure. That is why they are being careful not to jump to a conclusion about hijacking.
He's a bitch. Did you watch the press conference? Shame on him.
Why do you think he's a bitch?He's a bitch. Did you watch the press conference? Shame on him.
Plane still flying 7 hours after it went missing.
They know the direction it was headed.
Now all they need to do is the math based on the fuel it was carrying, and pinpointing a search radius should be relatively straightforward.
This is what I was wondering. "Deliberate" is pretty vague.
He was relaying the latest information? I don't see how it was shameful.
He's a bitch. Did you watch the press conference? Shame on him.
Could they have dumped all the people and cargo somewhere in order to get better fuel efficiency?
Wish I was joking about this.
He's a bitch. Did you watch the press conference? Shame on him.
He's a bitch. Did you watch the press conference? Shame on him.
Did it even have enough fuel for that?
I bet he has his hands deep in the airline industry. Something isn't right.
He was relaying the latest information? I don't see how it was shameful.
I assume the northern route also includes iran, afghanistan, pakistan if they said it goes up to the kazakhstan border.
Deliberate human action can be in response to mechanical failure. That is why they are being careful not to jump to a conclusion about hijacking.
I bet he has his hands deep in the airline industry. Something isn't right.
If this was truly maliciously deliberate the person or persons behind this knew how lax the radar was in that part of the world.You know, this shit is insane, it's as if our world leaders don't want to believe that someone is capable of doing something fucked up with a plane again. The fact that every Asian country and its leadership have been so laid back about this plane gone missing is infuriating, it's like another 9-11/WTC could happen all over again, or worse. This just says to terrorists that "Yeah, get an airliner out of Asia unseen? No problem!"
How on earth have they not gone through the passenger list with a fine tooth comb yet and tried to decipher someone with a background capable of hijacking this thing? This is so bizarre
I can totally see this. Something goes wrong, forced to change course drastically. Although, deliberate cutting off of communication is inconsistent with this theory.
I'm trying to think of a reason that they would turn the ACARS and transponders at 2 separate times. During the time between these 2 events no one from the plane said anything was wrong.
Changing direction I understand.
Was it because of his shifty eyes???I bet he has his hands deep in the airline industry. Something isn't right.
Not even 10 posts above you.Thailand to Kazakhstan is a large distance. Pakistan, Afghanistan, western China are all in between. We need a new radius from last known contact to spur more theories.
I bet he has his hands deep in the airline industry. Something isn't right.
Youre wrong.I bet he has his hands deep in the airline industry. Something isn't right.
Not probable. You can't just open the doors of a 777 during flight and dump stuff out. These kinds of things were taken into aircraft design consideration after D.B. Cooper parachuted off that 727.Could they have dumped all the people and cargo somewhere in order to get better fuel efficiency?
Wish I was joking about this.
If communications were deliberately shut down and the plane rerouted, the only thing that logically makes sense is that the plane was stolen IMO. And one or both pilots would probably need to be involved.if you've been following the story, this makes 0 sense
why the fuck would they disable comms?
I bet he has his hands deep in the airline industry. Something isn't right.
If communications were deliberately shut down and the plane rerouted, the only thing that logically makes sense is that the plane was stolen IMO. And one or both pilots would probably need to be involved.
Why would they fly for seven hours to the west if a fire, though?It's unlikely certainly but they're being careful. If there was some kind of fire it isn't inconceivable that they would systematically shut down components but that certainly wouldn't be my guess as to what happened. It's out of an abundance of caution to not eliminate it as a possible explanation at this point which I think they have a responsibility to continue.
Right. So what isn't right then? This is some kind of cover up from Malaysia Airlines?
So it's possible someone now has a 777 in their hands? Holy shit.
I mean, you need a considerable runway to land that thing. Unless you are a James Bond supervillain I dont see someone getting away with that unnoticed.So it's possible someone now has a 777 in their hands? Holy shit.