Man bitches about wife on forum; stays logged in and walks away... hilarity ensues

Status
Not open for further replies.
That site's database error message:

21kfixl.jpg


I think they're getting destroyed by the traffic.
 
God damn that is pretty nuts. I love how it's night and day between his writing style and hers.
 
Megadrive said:
You don't know how to read, do you?

First post was made 5th April. The response by his "wife" was made 7th of April. Well done Watson.

(I'm very sure the reason for it was just a difference in time from when each screenshot was taken where posts could've been deleted or anything else could've happened.)
K sherlock, let me explain better... the post count number is counted and displayed FOR THE USER when the page is rendered. So let me paint this hypothetical for you to better understand. Man makes post on the 5th of april (Current post count - 88), no one really cares and it isn't all that interesting. Two days later his wife uses the computer, sees the forum open on the thread and proceeds to post response (Current post count - 89). Another forum user screen shots for epicness before its deleted or edited. Thread grows this user account makes 14 posts before someone decides to screen shot the original post that started it all (Hence Post count - 103). The point is, the post count at the time of posting isn't recorded or displayed, only the current post count tied to the user. Elementary my dear
 
Megadrive said:
You don't know how to read, do you?

First post was made 5th April. The response by his "wife" was made 7th of April. Well done Watson.

(I'm very sure the reason for it was just a difference in time from when each screenshot was taken where posts could've been deleted or anything else could've happened.)
I don't think you understand what he is saying. The first screenshot was captured second. The post count had gone up by this time. This is how post counts work.
 
Cheeto said:
K sherlock, let me explain better... the post count number is counted and displayed FOR THE USER when the page is rendered. So let me paint this hypothetical for you to better understand. Man makes post on the 5th of april (Current post count - 88), no one really cares and it isn't all that interesting. Two days later his wife uses the computer, sees the forum open on the thread and proceeds to post response (Current post count - 89). Another forum user screen shots for epicness before its deleted or edited. Thread grows this user account makes 14 posts before someone decides to screen shot the original post that started it all (Hence Post count - 103). The point is, the post count at the time of posting isn't recorded or displayed, only the current post count tied to the user. Elementary my dear

I think it was either a database error or the mods whacked a ton of his posts in the ~5 minutes between screen shots. I screen shotted them in the order posted in the OP, and didn't even notice the disparity in the number of posts. I'm tending towards the database error given the fact that the guy now has over 108 posts.
 
-viper- said:
What an idiot. :lol

Don't you just love the gulf in intelligence and intellect between the two?

I thought that was pretty funny, too, until I realized that she got knocked up by his broke, jobless ass.

She's pretty stupid, too, despite her ability to spell and punctuate.
 
mre said:
I think it was either a database error or the mods whacked a ton of his posts in the ~5 minutes between screen shots. I screen shotted them in the order posted in the OP, and didn't even notice the disparity in the number of posts. I'm tending towards the database error given the fact that the guy now has over 108 posts.
I didn't know you took the original shots... I figured you found it somewhere else and were reposting the shots, (safe to assume since 90% of topics here are reposted from reddit anyways) either way my hypothetical is still valid not knowing all the facts.
 
Cheeto said:
K sherlock, let me explain better... the post count number is counted and displayed FOR THE USER when the page is rendered. So let me paint this hypothetical for you to better understand. Man makes post on the 5th of april (Current post count - 88), no one really cares and it isn't all that interesting. Two days later his wife uses the computer, sees the forum open on the thread and proceeds to post response (Current post count - 89). Another forum user screen shots for epicness before its deleted or edited. Thread grows this user account makes 14 posts before someone decides to screen shot the original post that started it all (Hence Post count - 103). The point is, the post count at the time of posting isn't recorded or displayed, only the current post count tied to the user. Elementary my dear

Makes sense, I kept thinking that the screenshot was timestamped :lol
 
To everyone trying to explain it to me, I know how forums work. The way you guys clearly think I'm thinking is how Ezboards used to (still?) work.

Also, Cheeto? You're wrong. First post: 103. Second post: 89. Which makes me right, and you wrong. I do understand that the post count that displays is how many posts that user has when the page (and subsequent data) is fetched from the database. Thus, at the first post, he might indeed have had 103 posts including that post. And when his girlfriend posted, posts of his would have been deleted making his post count 89.

So maybe you should understand what you're trying to explain before trying to explain it to me?

Stealth edit: I read your post fully and yeah, nevermind. You get it as do I. I apologise for being a tad dickish. Soldier on! (Y)

Edit2: Just to clarify quickly before I hop to bed, in modern forum software, the current post count is available throughout the system and is updated in every thread the user has posted in. So the wife's reply probably got screenshotted first, then the original post got screenshotted second. Which, from the looks of it, were on different pages so the person screenshotting would have had to refresh the page, therefore refreshing the dingbats postcount, upping it from whatever it might've been before. I really hope that makes sense because I'm not going to proofread it.
 
Great read... now I am thinking if this gal is a looker... You could be man of the year to her if you just treated her nice. She is smart or seems smart (not counting her choice in men) and obviously has some good qualities.

Just saying.

Edit: Nevermind.. saw the photo.
 
J.M.Reyes said:
there is a picture of the "couple" in the thread :lol

Post it please. The site keeps going down so I can't view each page.


Count Dookkake said:
I thought that was pretty funny, too, until I realized that she got knocked up by his broke, jobless ass.

She's pretty stupid, too, despite her ability to spell and punctuate.


Probably a smart ugly girl with better looking asshole guy...nothing too crazy.
 
zero margin said:
Verdict on the chick? :lol

I would post it but I dont wanna get the banhammer for being an internet detective :lol , not really sure if it applies to this case but I like it here :D

edit: ah whatever, if a mod think its necessary to delete it, I will

2vjcqrs.jpg



what an e-thug :lol
 
Megadrive said:
To everyone trying to explain it to me, I know how forums work. The way you guys clearly think I'm thinking is how Ezboards used to (still?) work.

Also, Cheeto? You're wrong. First post: 103. Second post: 89. Which makes me right, and you wrong. I do understand that the post count that displays is how many posts that user has when the page (and subsequent data) is fetched from the database. Thus, at the first post, he might indeed have had 103 posts including that post. And when his girlfriend posted, posts of his would have been deleted making his post count 89.

So maybe you should understand what you're trying to explain before trying to explain it to me?

Stealth edit: I read your post fully and yeah, nevermind. You get it as do I. I apologise for being a tad dickish. Soldier on! (Y)

You and Cheeto are pretty much saying the same thing and coming up with different hypothesis as to how it happened.

fake edit: okay I just read your stealth edit. Carry on!
 
J.M.Reyes said:
I would post it but I dont wanna get the banhammer for being an internet detective :lol , not really sure if it applies to this case but I like it here :D

edit: ah whatever, if a mod think its necessary to delete it, I will

http://i44.tinypic.com/2vjcqrs.jpg


what an e-thug :lol

You could just post the link to where the image is in the thread instead of reposting it here if you're that worried about it
 
The Interrobanger said:
It's always car forums, bodybuilding forums and video game forums. Not that surprising considering generally speaking they're some of the most retarded, irrational, socially inept, passionate and tech savvy people on the planet. It's a messy combination.

So true. I wonder what the members of exotic sports car (Ferrari, Lambo, etc.) owner forums are like. I've visited a few of those forums and they seem pretty normal, but you never know.
 
The man sounds like a complete moron. The woman, on the other hand, seems quite intelligent. One wonders why she would be with such a deadbeat in the first place and, further, have a child with him while they were unmarried. Then she stayed with him despite the facts that he is obsessed with a ridiculous car and that he only works three nights a week.
 
SnowWolf said:
So true. I wonder what the members of exotic sports car (Ferrari, Lambo, etc.) owner forums are like. I've visited a few of those forums and they seem pretty normal, but you never know.

It's generally car forums that attract the ricers. And Hondas are pretty popular among that community. My favorite ricer related backfire is still the Miami forum where a guy bitched about a cop giving him a ticket but the cop was a registered member.
 
Ceres said:
It's generally car forums that attract the ricers. And Hondas are pretty popular among that community. My favorite ricer related backfire is still the Miami forum where a guy bitched about a cop giving him a ticket but the cop was a registered member.

Dude, please link!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom