You can definitely use him, but you need to have an original approach beyond the Hackman Luthor. TAS Luthor could easily carry an entire film.
Feels bad knowing that Spacey was wasted.
You can definitely use him, but you need to have an original approach beyond the Hackman Luthor. TAS Luthor could easily carry an entire film.
so you think they'd ever do doomsday in a sequel?
Feels bad knowing that Spacey was wasted.
Hey, he fights Superman and other metas on a regular. Sometimes, a man's gotta stop scheming and punch something.
Ever watch TAS all the way through? Probably the best Luthor ever consistently written (outside of individual comics & a few episodes of Samllville).
No robo-suit.
I have. More than once actually, and the animated stuff is the reason Lex is my favorite villian.Ever watch TAS all the way through? Probably the best Luthor ever consistently written (outside of individual comics & a few episodes of Samllville).
No robo-suit.
The Entertainment Weekly article explains that in this version of Krypton, armors are built on top of tight suits. Which is why Superman’s suit is how it is and why Zod and Jor-El’s are as we’ve seen them.
The origin is largely the same — Jor-El saves his son by sending him to Earth — but there are a few major differences.The main one is in this film, children of Krypton are genetically engineered to be something specific. Kal-El, aka Superman, is different and infamous because he was the rare child conceived naturally, meaning he can choose his path in life. Unfortunately for him, that also means his existence is against the law. Just another way to lend imperfections to a character that’s naturally perfect.
However... This picture is badass...
![]()
Dunno if this was answered but the Kryptonian armors are CG in some scenesIs it just me, or does this pic look really unnatural? Like his face was CG'd onto the body or something? Reminds me of this:
Some interesting bits from that EW page:
I'm actually grateful for that first spoiler.As a life-long Superman fan, I've always hated the concept of kryptonite, and Snyder's right with it being pretty much a crutch and a cliche at this point. We can find some other ways to make Superman vulnerable than a green space-rock invented entirely by the 1940's radio serial.
Is it just me, or does this pic look really unnatural? Like his face was CG'd onto the body or something? Reminds me of this:
The suits will be CGI in at least some scenes.
Yeah, people shouldn't be asking "Is his head photoshopped on?" But "why didn't they render the suit right?"
Most of the time Shannon wasn't actually wearing anything but a black bodysuit, right? The actual armor he's wearing is mostly done in CG, like Superman's cape. At least that's what I thought the m.o. was for this movie.
yeah it's pretty extensiveYeah, people shouldn't be asking "Is his head photoshopped on?" But "why didn't they render the suit right?"
Most of the time Shannon wasn't actually wearing anything but a black bodysuit, right? The actual armor he's wearing is mostly done in CG, like Superman's cape. At least that's what I thought the m.o. was for this movie.
Yeah, people shouldn't be asking "Is his head photoshopped on?" But "why didn't they render the suit right?"
Most of the time Shannon wasn't actually wearing anything but a black bodysuit, right? The actual armor he's wearing is mostly done in CG, like Superman's cape. At least that's what I thought the m.o. was for this movie.
This is a Grant Morrison thing. He talks about it when he's discussing creating All-Star Superman (aka The Greatest Superman Tale Ever Told)
In the sequel I want Superman fighting something the size of Godzilla, even if it's just a James Bond-style opening action sequence.
Someone call Guillermo Del Toro and organise a Pacific Rim-Superman crossover.
Superman set out to introduce these themes to the masses by gliding majestically through the air, but no longer is that enough to garner attention -- audiences have seen that plenty of times, and Singer/Synder/Nolan realised this. Its no coincidence therefore that the greater emphasis in Superman films will be of to pull the strings of the heart rather than beat its drums. No more sob stories, some decried. But how else to make the character "relevant" as Nolan recently described? How else do you distinguish it from the myriad of demigods in the box office if not humanise them?
What has me excited about MoS is not the descriptions of the fight scenes, but rather the inner conflict Clark, and Kal-El, endure from childhood into their adult life; there is a story here. I just hope it's interesting enough to be held as the Story of Superman rather than the story of comic book hero #12.
What excites me is that they are owning his abilities and pitting him against equally powerful villains instead of kryptonite trickery.
Each to their own. But already I, and I dare imagine you also, have a good idea of how that fight sequence will go; slow-mo punches, bodies flung through walls and cars; explosions; collisions. It's all cliche. I saw it last week, in fact, in Incredible Hulk.
Jason Bourne fighting a man with a rolled-up newspaper was more exciting and creative than any fight scene between super powered characters I've seen on the big screen.
Each to their own. But already I, and I dare imagine you also, have a good idea of how that fight sequence will go; slow-mo punches, bodies flung through walls and cars; explosions; collisions. It's all cliche. I saw it last week, in fact, in Incredible Hulk.
Jason Bourne fighting a man with a rolled-up newspaper was more exciting and creative than any fight scene between super powered characters I've seen on the big screen.
That's like saying you don't like gun fights because everybody holds the guns using their hands.
It's hard to convey the great strength and speed of super hero movies without also being too realistic (punches breaking through skulls, huge amounts of damage that kills civilians). You have to use tricks and camera angles to convey the power
Superman set out to introduce these themes to the masses by gliding majestically through the air, but no longer is that enough to garner attention -- audiences have seen that plenty of times, and Singer/Synder/Nolan realised this. Its no coincidence therefore that the greater emphasis in Superman films will be of to pull the strings of the heart rather than beat its drums. No more sob stories, some decried. But how else to make the character "relevant" as Nolan recently described? How else do you distinguish it from the myriad of demigods in the box office if not humanise them?
What has me excited about MoS is not the descriptions of the fight scenes, but rather the inner conflict Clark, and Kal-El, endure from childhood into their adult life; there is a story here. I just hope it's interesting enough to be held as the Story of Superman rather than the story of comic book hero #12.
Why are we acting like character development with introspective themes and big large scale battles against impossible foes are mutually exclusive?
Superman set out to introduce these themes to the masses by gliding majestically through the air, but no longer is that enough to garner attention -- audiences have seen that plenty of times, and Singer/Synder/Nolan realised this. Its no coincidence therefore that the greater emphasis in Superman films will be of to pull the strings of the heart rather than beat its drums. No more sob stories, some decried. But how else to make the character "relevant" as Nolan recently described? How else do you distinguish it from the myriad of demigods in the box office if not humanise them?
What has me excited about MoS is not the descriptions of the fight scenes, but rather the inner conflict Clark, and Kal-El, endure from childhood into their adult life; there is a story here. I just hope it's interesting enough to be held as the Story of Superman rather than the story of comic book hero #12.
He's going to call Wonder Woman and Batman up for some lessons.Faora's gonna use krypton martial arts so Superman's gonna have to learn how to fight. That's kinda new.
Yeah that's probably it. I do hope Synder and co. never feel they have to take this either or approach, even if the audiences expect it.So much of blockbuster filmmaking has essentially trained regular viewers to expect one or the other. Further, those same audiences have been essentially trained to prefer one to the other, or accuse the one of pretension if it even ATTEMPTS to incorporate elements of the other.
Either/Or is almost always the default. Never a blend of both.
so you think they'd ever do doomsday in a sequel?
You're making an unfair comparison between an exceptional improvisational human fighter and a superpowered alien from another world who, due to said superpowers, doesn't need to do anything remotely like Bourne. It's perfectly okay for superheroes to act like superheroes if it's well done. The Incredible Hulk was NOT well done.Each to their own. But already I, and I dare imagine you also, have a good idea of how that fight sequence will go; slow-mo punches, bodies flung through walls and cars; explosions; collisions. It's all cliche. I saw it last week, in fact, in Incredible Hulk.
Jason Bourne fighting a man with a rolled-up newspaper was more exciting and creative than any fight scene between super powered characters I've seen on the big screen.
Probably
He's a famous villain, but he's also pretty damn boring. Just a big dumb punching machine.
I doubt WB wouldn't have signed him for at least three for a franchise like this.
Good to see DC go on record that this will be the start of something bigger
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/04/11/man-of-steel-dc-comics-superhero-movies/
We got some Clark/Supes conflict and no action in Returns and look how that turned out.
Is punching a prerequisite for an action scene for some people? That seems to be the operative word for a lot of people: "punch."
Superman Returns certainly had action scenes, just not a "real" fight scene.
Because DoS was the non-BS origins of Steel and Connor Kent, and everytime they've retold the story/the characters they've gotten worse. It's also the basis for Blackest Night, which is never going away.Doomsday would be a huge mistake, honestly.
He's a shit character, always has been. Fuck, use Mongul if you wanna use a giant alien bruiser. At least Mongul has a personality.
Death of Superman was a garbage story. I've never understood why DC/WB keeps trying to go back to that well. It's puddle-deep.
Thats pretty much the very first question people ask in interviews, yeah is very important.
Good to see DC go on record that this will be the start of something bigger
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/04/11/man-of-steel-dc-comics-superhero-movies/
Damn, Joker card is still one of my favorite endingsDavid S. Goyer, who co-wrote The Dark Knight films and the screenplay for Man of Steel says this crew doesnt like sequel bait.
Specifically that Superman punches someone? I mean, yeah, a good throw down is fun and all, but it seems pretty low-brow and childish to demand someone punch someone else in order for a film to be exciting.
Specifically that Superman punches someone? I mean, yeah, a good throw down is fun and all, but it seems pretty low-brow and childish to demand someone punch someone else in order for a film to be exciting.