Is that the best you got?
Is that a threat?
Honestly? Nothing personal, but I hope this makes a billion so none of those things you list happen.I don't class my notion of Superman to be inherently Donnersque. For example, the change in Lois and Clark's relationship didn't bother me. I was impressed how the; I'm glad that it actually played a part in Clark's behaviour there-forth. My complaints were not character-driven; they were not ideological in that sense.death of his father was handled
If anyone has read my defence of Superman Returns they'll note it was based on how Superman was portrayed visually. I loved the way Superman effortlessly hovered in mid-air; I loved the way he used the camera to create an aura around him.
The scene where he caught the globe and slowly came down with the camera swivelling around Jimmy and the Williams' theme tune in the background to me showcased more power and more majesty than any of the fight scenes in Man of Steel.
Is that 'Donneresque'? I don't know but it certainly resonated with my interpretation of the character. Superman, to me, is beyond bodies going through walls and cars. I've seen that in every comic book movie; it's become generic and cliche, but still many fans wanted to see it. Well, I hope they have their fill with this. To be honest I hold a bit of resentment towards that demographic now.
To me, Man of Steel wasn't a good Superman movie. I can't remember what happened after they arrived in Kansas. I only remember that shot I really liked. Despite that, I hope the film succeeds and a sequel gets a different director.
I don't class my notion of Superman to be inherently Donnersque. For example, the change in Lois and Clark's relationship didn't bother me. I was impressed how the; I'm glad that it actually played a part in Clark's behaviour there-forth. My complaints were not character-driven; they were not ideological in that sense.death of his father was handled
If anyone has read my defence of Superman Returns they'll note it was based on how Superman was portrayed visually. I loved the way Superman effortlessly hovered in mid-air; I loved the way he used the camera to create an aura around him.
The scene where he caught the globe and slowly came down with the camera swivelling around Jimmy and the Williams' theme tune in the background to me showcased more power and more majesty than any of the fight scenes in Man of Steel.
Is that 'Donneresque'? I don't know but it certainly resonated with my interpretation of the character. Superman, to me, is beyond bodies going through walls and cars. I've seen that in every comic book movie; it's become generic and cliche, but still many fans wanted to see it. Well, I hope they have their fill with this. To be honest I hold a bit of resentment towards that demographic now.
To me, Man of Steel wasn't a good Superman movie. I can't remember what happened after they arrived in Kansas. I only remember that shot I really liked. Despite that, I hope the film succeeds and a sequel gets a different director.
it's fine dude. like what you like. I didn't want to come across as mean.
don't have an issue with you. Trolls like Good Job Bob on the other hand.........
I would like to know the following people's opinions of Man of Steel:
Jerry Seinfeld
Nicolas Cage
Kevin Smith
Jesus this thread blew up in the last few hours!
I can join GAF in the sun (or mount the curb if it stinks) in 16 hours.
Saw it today. Thought it was so-so.
The Good:
+ Cavill: it's not a powerhouse performance or anything, but he's got the charm and charisma to make you believe he's Superman
+ Clark/Lois dynamic: I liked how this relationship played, neat new angle on it
+ Faora is a boss
+ Some of the action is terrific, particularly+ Great scorethe Smallville fight
+ The ending sequence is beautiful, I really loved it
The Not Good:
- Snyder still can't direct actors, so performances are pretty flat all across the board
- Zod was a wasted opportunity. Shannon should, theoretically, nail it but the cartoonish writing and lack of direction leaves him nothing to do but chew scenery occasionally
- The script is *completely* undercooked, none of the characters or plot points were developed nearly as well as they should have been. The worst offender is Clark, who has zero character, zero reason to care about his journey, and zero motivation for being Superman. The only reason it happens at all is because. That's pathetic. There's no conflict or choice involved to getting there, he just flips a switch.Jor-El tells him to
- Pacing is way too quick, coupled with a weak script, you have a movie that's rushing through its story without at any point establishing why it's important or worth watching
- Tone. Way too fucking dour. People shit on Nolan's Batman or Craig's Bond for being too serious, but those movies still have a solid amount of levity. This has none. And being that overly self-serious without any moment to breathe just comes off as ridiculous in the long run
- Some of the action is pointless. Mostly in the, with a bunch of fake explosions and people we don't know being put in contrived situations for no reason.Metropolis fight
- No stakes. This is kind of a combination of other complaints, but basically, underdeveloped characters + meaningless action scenes = who gives a fuck. There's no tension, not because it's Superman and he'll save the day no matter what, but because there's no reason to care about any of these guys -- some of whom were barely given names.
- The resolution to Supes vs. Zod.I have no problem with the idea of Superman killing a bad guy. It's not something he would normally do, so when it does happen, it can be a pretty powerful moment given the right context. Here, it was absolutely pointless. Nothing in the movie was building up to Clark having to make a choice of killing someone to save others, I don't think anything in the movie even addressed his mentality on killing or not killing. Even worse is that there was no fallout to the decision. He angsts for all of 5 seconds, then cut to: he's smiling and hanging out with his mom. If Superman has to kill someone, there should be some serious weight to that decision. There was none here.
- Doesn't feel like a Superman movie at all. This is very much an alien invasion/first contact story, but as a Superman adaptation, it doesn't have all that much to do with the character. Snyder, Cavill, et al. have talked up in the press how Superman isn't like Batman or other heroes, and that Supes is an unwavering embodiment of all that's good and right and just in the world. But that doesn't come across at all here. This has nothing to do with Donner/Reeve, I have absolutely no attachment to those movies or that interpretation (I don't even like them), but there's a certain ultimate-force-for-good quality that Superman is supposed to have that this movie didn't capture.
Those are more complaints than I meant to type out. :lol All in all, I'm not THAT disappointed with it; I thought it was just fine. But there was a lot of wasted opportunities and I'm not all that optimistic about there being improvements in a sequel because I think a lot of these flaws are just ingrained in Snyder and Goyer's creative DNA. Snyder has made, what, a half dozen movies by now? All very heavy on the visuals, but weak on narrative. He didn't turn it around here, so I don't think it's likely he ever will.
For all the issues I had with it, it ended on a really REALLY good note, and I've had the theme stuck in my head for the past hour. So in spite of all the bad, it certainly did something right along the way.
Expertly delivered. This point in particular resonated with me because it is, word for word, exactly what I said to my brother after seeing it.
Jesus this thread blew up in the last few hours!
I can join GAF in the sun (or mount the curb if it stinks) in 16 hours.
What did you think of Watchmen or Superman Returns?
And Superman is not about an Alien?
Or Im missing something here?
Hated everything about Watchmen, thought Returns was pretty but soulless and had that one good action sequence.
Expertly delivered. This point in particular resonated with me because it is, word for word, exactly what I said to my brother after seeing it. Not that there is anything wrong with it: personally I enjoyed the new take on this story, but it wasn't worked well at all.
Why does Superman seemingly cry at having killed Zod whenhe effectively rejects saving the unborn Kryptonians because "too bad, Krypton had its chance" line? Killing one is bad, but leaving the rest pretty much extinct is meh?
Adjust your expectations accordingly then. :lol
Hated everything about Watchmen, thought Returns was pretty but soulless and had that one good action sequence.
because it hit him that he's the last of his kind. I think he still thought he could just stop him instead of having to kill him. his hand was forced and he hated it.
Oh, I know. I've said from day one that he was announced that Zack Snyder being chosen to direct was going to be a HUGE hurdle for the movie to overcome for me.
The only Snyder film I've derived any real enjoyment from was DotD. Sucker Punch had some cool action sequences but who really cares when they're in Sucker Punch.
Even without the slow-mo, it's still very much a Zack Snyder movie through and through. All of his typical strengths and weakness are still full on display here.
Updated my post. I actually liked the first contact approach, but it seemed to overtake any sense of conflict Clark may have had in importance. In the end, Kal-El gives no fucks about Krypton or its people, even though not seemingly attached to humans(his conversation about a lack of trust of humans with the priest).
That's another the thing the story was trying to do but never really earned.There's no dilemma with Clark having selfish, shitty people and having to weigh or not they're worth saving. He saves people throughout the movie, then doles out the "maybe people actually do suck," then immediately switches back to being selfless.
I thought thewas really great though, don't know why I liked it so much, but I said goddamn."Krypton had it's chance!" line
He didn't need to be the last of his kind. In fact, I cant recall him ever pleading or trying to convince Zod that they could share the Earth - this despite Jor-El hoping Kal to be a "bridge between our two people". They just seemed to have been punching one another.
Unless of course I completely missed that scene
Umm am I the only one thatfelt nothing during his dad's death. I'm pretty sure 100% of people in the same situation would've saved him. Maybe if there were no chance for Clark to step in it would've been emotional. The way it played out it felt silly and more like a suicide. Why shed a year for that? His mom would've been devastated.
Updated my post. I actually liked the first contact approach, but it seemed to overtake any sense of conflict Clark may have had in importance. In the end, Kal-El gives no fucks about Krypton or its people, even though not seemingly attached to humans(his conversation about a lack of trust of humans with the priest).
But Krypton didn't do anything inherently wrong. Ironically, the story of it exhausted its resources through overpopulation and expansion seemed like a nod at humanity's current path. Jor-El specifically says in that very same monologue that the two people are not disimilar and hopefully with Superman's support, humanity will make different choices. So it didn't make any sense to me as to why he would damn them to extinction, especially when he thought he was all alone
But Krypton didn't do anything inherently wrong. Ironically, the story of it exhausted its resources through overpopulation and expansion seemed like a nod at humanity's current path. Jor-El specifically says in that very same monologue that the two people are not disimilar and hopefully with Superman's support, humanity will make different choices. So it didn't make any sense to me as to why he would damn them to extinction, especially when he thought he was all alone
yeah you are.
Just got out and I loved every fucking second holy shit the most epic movie ever. Made avengers and avatar seem small. I will gather my thoughts later, but.......goddamn I'm ready to see it again!
The place was packed and there were so many lines in the theater as we were leaving. This movie is huge!
I doubt you cried at that scene.
People applauded in the theatre showing I was in once the film ended. I've never seen that happen before. So, meh, what do I know eh
The Krypton scenes are fantastic by the way. By far the highlight of the movie for me. And Zod was in fact the hero in this film for me