Every time Ball puts up a shot I feel like it's going in.
Honestly tho, I'd rather lose like this than how Carolina lost last year. Let them have their jokes. We all know which one hurts more.
Maybe winning the ACCT hurt us in the end. Team played way better and hungrier with a chip on their shoulders, like they had something to prove. Maybe a few guys felt like the ACCT was "good enough".
I dunno. Maybe I'm just making up more excuses.
Me neither. Maybe a big crowd advantage could help? I dunno.I don't see UK beating UCLA. Just a bad matchup. Welp.
Kentucky and (probably) UCLA tip off at 9:40pm EST on Friday. Another really late game, but at least I won't have to worry about getting out of work.
last time we played
I remember being completely unimpressed with Ball, didnt get the hype, that Leaf and Welsh were absolute killers
I don't see UK beating UCLA. Just a bad matchup. Welp.
Honestly tho, I'd rather lose like this than how Carolina lost last year. Let them have their jokes. We all know which one hurts more.
Yeah, Leaf destroyed UK while Lonzo was just average. Also that score was a lot closer than it seemed. I think UCLA was up 10+ over the last few minutes and that gap really didn't close until the end.
@WBBBPB
If there are Duke grads who are NC legislators who backed/voted for bathroom bill, hope they're happy screwing their team.
I'd rather lose in the first round than lose a title in the most heartbreaking way imaginable.You'd rather lose prior to the sweet 16 than nearly winning the whole thing. Check.
You'd rather lose prior to the sweet 16 than nearly winning the whole thing. Check.
Today Duke learned that it's hard to win when you're playing 5 on 8. That game was a travesty.
walking into work tomorrow like
![]()
every other ACC team fan gonna be quiet as a church mouse
Also enjoy seeing this after the national media kept lobbying for Duke to be a #1 seed. That was so ridiculous.
tbf, 22 fouls on SC, 26 on duke
32 FT for SC, 29 for duke
if you take into account that duke had to foul a bunch in a row at the end, during the actual game, the fouls were pretty even.
the officials were... (bad)
but its not that skewed
the difference is SC had a bench and dispersed their fouls, duke got them all on their starters who never come out
edit:
just realized you might have meant, 5 players vs 8 players, not the 5 + refs, if so, disregard.
I might be biased, but I felt like our players weren't allowed to be as physical as theirs for the 2nd half of the first half. The fouls went from 7 to 3 to 7 to 10 or something.
At least ain't gonna be anyone saying we were gifted a victory by the refs.
Another plus is that we don't have to visit Trump.
Yeah it was less about the differential and more about the inconsistency of what types of contact was allowed, and how that shifted throughout the game, IMO. Seemed like our guards were getting bodied around a lot even inside the arc with no calls, but we'd get called for equivalent contact in the paint.
Whenever we tried to match their physical play we just kept getting whistled for it.
Good win for you guys. Somewhere, Kevtones is celebrating
#FreeKevtones
Even our 2015 team might have lost tonight. Tyus and Quinn would have 4 turnovers each and Justice Winslow would have been on the bench for 75% of the game due to foul trouble. Okafor would have been a total net neutral due to his defensive woes.
I've been following Duke bball since 2006, and I've never complained about officiating being the cause of our loss in the NCAAs. This is NOT the same as 2011 Arizona.
I glossed over this before, but you know you would've loved to see K interact with Trump. Don't lie.